Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and upper endoscopy: a real-world experience

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1002/oby.24190
Pichamol Jirapinyo, Noppachai Siranart, Christopher C. Thompson
{"title":"Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and upper endoscopy: a real-world experience","authors":"Pichamol Jirapinyo,&nbsp;Noppachai Siranart,&nbsp;Christopher C. Thompson","doi":"10.1002/oby.24190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Increased use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) has raised safety concerns during endoscopy due to their mechanism of delaying gastric emptying. This study aims to evaluate the impact of GLP-1RAs on technical success and safety of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective study of bariatric patients who underwent EGD between January 2022 and December 2023. Only patients on GLP-1RAs were included and were categorized into those who held GLP-1RAs prior to EGD (GLP-HELD group) and those who did not (GLP-CONTINUED group). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as completion of EGD without interruption. Secondary outcomes included the presence of residual gastric contents during EGD and aspiration rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 629 patients were included. Baseline age and BMI were mean (SD) 54.9 (13.0) years and 37.3 (8.0) kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Of 629 patients, 146 (23%) were in the GLP-HELD group, and 483 (77%) were in the GLP-CONTINUED group. For the primary outcome, rates of early termination of EGD were similar between groups (1.4% for GLP-CONTINUED vs. 0% for GLP-HELD; <i>p</i> = 0.36). For secondary outcomes, incidence of residual gastric contents was similar between groups (6.4% for GLP-CONTINUED vs. 2.7% for GLP-HELD; <i>p</i> = 0.09). There were no aspiration events in either group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Continuation of GLP-1RAs did not appear to be associated with an increased incidence of residual gastric contents, early procedural termination, or aspiration events.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"33 2","pages":"250-256"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Increased use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) has raised safety concerns during endoscopy due to their mechanism of delaying gastric emptying. This study aims to evaluate the impact of GLP-1RAs on technical success and safety of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of bariatric patients who underwent EGD between January 2022 and December 2023. Only patients on GLP-1RAs were included and were categorized into those who held GLP-1RAs prior to EGD (GLP-HELD group) and those who did not (GLP-CONTINUED group). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as completion of EGD without interruption. Secondary outcomes included the presence of residual gastric contents during EGD and aspiration rates.

Results

A total of 629 patients were included. Baseline age and BMI were mean (SD) 54.9 (13.0) years and 37.3 (8.0) kg/m2, respectively. Of 629 patients, 146 (23%) were in the GLP-HELD group, and 483 (77%) were in the GLP-CONTINUED group. For the primary outcome, rates of early termination of EGD were similar between groups (1.4% for GLP-CONTINUED vs. 0% for GLP-HELD; p = 0.36). For secondary outcomes, incidence of residual gastric contents was similar between groups (6.4% for GLP-CONTINUED vs. 2.7% for GLP-HELD; p = 0.09). There were no aspiration events in either group.

Conclusions

Continuation of GLP-1RAs did not appear to be associated with an increased incidence of residual gastric contents, early procedural termination, or aspiration events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和上内窥镜:一个真实世界的经验。
目的:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)的使用增加,由于其延迟胃排空的机制,引起了内镜检查时的安全性担忧。本研究旨在评估GLP-1RAs对食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD)技术成功和安全性的影响。方法:这是一项对2022年1月至2023年12月期间接受EGD治疗的肥胖患者的回顾性研究。仅纳入GLP-1RAs患者,并将其分为EGD前持有GLP-1RAs的患者(GLP-HELD组)和未持有GLP-1RAs的患者(glp -继续组)。主要结果是技术上的成功,定义为无中断地完成EGD。次要结局包括EGD期间胃内容物残留情况和吸入率。结果:共纳入629例患者。基线年龄和BMI均值(SD)分别为54.9(13.0)岁和37.3 (8.0)kg/m2。629例患者中,GLP-HELD组146例(23%),glp - continue组483例(77%)。对于主要结局,两组间EGD的早期终止率相似(glp - continue组为1.4%,GLP-HELD组为0%;p = 0.36)。对于次要结局,两组间胃内容物残留发生率相似(glp - continue组6.4% vs. GLP-HELD组2.7%;p = 0.09)。两组均无误吸事件发生。结论:继续使用GLP-1RAs似乎与胃内容物残留、早期手术终止或误吸事件的发生率增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity
Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
261
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Key Determinants of Weight Loss Trajectory Across Different Periods of a Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention The Weight of Social Risk and Opportunities for Obesity Prevention Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacological, Endoscopic, and Surgical Treatments for Obesity: A GRADE-Based Network Meta-Analysis The POWER of Sleep in Promoting Weight Loss Among Breast Cancer Survivors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1