Automated construction contract analysis for risk and responsibility assessment using natural language processing and machine learning

IF 9.1 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers in Industry Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.compind.2025.104251
Irem Dikmen , Gorkem Eken , Huseyin Erol , M. Talat Birgonul
{"title":"Automated construction contract analysis for risk and responsibility assessment using natural language processing and machine learning","authors":"Irem Dikmen ,&nbsp;Gorkem Eken ,&nbsp;Huseyin Erol ,&nbsp;M. Talat Birgonul","doi":"10.1016/j.compind.2025.104251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Construction contracts contain critical risk-related information that requires in-depth examination, yet tight schedules for bidding limit the possibility of comprehensive review of extensive documents manually. This research aims to develop models for automating the review of construction contracts to extract information on risk and responsibility that will provide inputs for risk management plans. Models were trained on 2268 sentences from International Federation of Consulting Engineers templates and tested on an actual construction project contract containing 1217 sentences. A taxonomy classified sentences into Heading, Definition, Obligation, Risk, and Right categories with related parties of Contractor, Employer, and Shared. Twelve models employing diverse Natural Language Processing vectorization techniques and Machine Learning algorithms were implemented and benchmarked based on accuracy and F1 score. Binary classification of sentence types and an ensemble method integrating top models were further applied to improve performance. The best model achieved 89 % accuracy for sentence types and 83 % for related parties, demonstrating the capabilities of automated contract review for identification of risk and responsibilities. Adopting the proposed approach can significantly expedite contract reviews to support risk management activities, bid preparation processes and prevent disputes caused by overlooking risks and responsibilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55219,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Industry","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104251"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Industry","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166361525000168","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction contracts contain critical risk-related information that requires in-depth examination, yet tight schedules for bidding limit the possibility of comprehensive review of extensive documents manually. This research aims to develop models for automating the review of construction contracts to extract information on risk and responsibility that will provide inputs for risk management plans. Models were trained on 2268 sentences from International Federation of Consulting Engineers templates and tested on an actual construction project contract containing 1217 sentences. A taxonomy classified sentences into Heading, Definition, Obligation, Risk, and Right categories with related parties of Contractor, Employer, and Shared. Twelve models employing diverse Natural Language Processing vectorization techniques and Machine Learning algorithms were implemented and benchmarked based on accuracy and F1 score. Binary classification of sentence types and an ensemble method integrating top models were further applied to improve performance. The best model achieved 89 % accuracy for sentence types and 83 % for related parties, demonstrating the capabilities of automated contract review for identification of risk and responsibilities. Adopting the proposed approach can significantly expedite contract reviews to support risk management activities, bid preparation processes and prevent disputes caused by overlooking risks and responsibilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用自然语言处理和机器学习进行风险和责任评估的自动化施工合同分析
建筑合同中包含与风险相关的关键信息,这些信息需要深入审查,但由于招标时间紧迫,人工全面审查大量文件的可能性受到限制。本研究旨在开发自动化审查建筑合同的模型,以提取有关风险和责任的信息,为风险管理计划提供输入。模型在国际咨询工程师联合会模板中的2268个句子上进行了训练,并在包含1217个句子的实际建设项目合同上进行了测试。一个分类法将句子分为标题、定义、义务、风险和权利四类,关联方为承包人、雇主和共享方。采用不同的自然语言处理矢量化技术和机器学习算法实现了12个模型,并基于准确性和F1分数对其进行了基准测试。为了提高性能,进一步采用了句子类型二分类和顶层模型集成方法。最好的模型在句子类型上达到了89% %的准确率,在相关方上达到了83% %的准确率,展示了自动合同审查识别风险和责任的能力。采用建议的方法可以大大加快合同审查,以支持风险管理活动和投标准备过程,并防止因忽视风险和责任而引起的纠纷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in Industry
Computers in Industry 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
152
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The objective of Computers in Industry is to present original, high-quality, application-oriented research papers that: • Illuminate emerging trends and possibilities in the utilization of Information and Communication Technology in industry; • Establish connections or integrations across various technology domains within the expansive realm of computer applications for industry; • Foster connections or integrations across diverse application areas of ICT in industry.
期刊最新文献
Explainable artificial intelligence for enhancing system understanding and interpretability of numerical crash simulations A Material Passport Ontology for a circular economy MSDCIR-AD: Unsupervised anomaly detection via Multi-criteria Semantic Distances and Constrained Image Reconstruction A multimodal link prediction approach for bridge maintenance via spatiotemporal feature fusion and cross-modal contrastive interaction An indicator-driven evolutionary algorithm for constrained multi-objective optimization with small feasible regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1