Association of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations and postpartum mental health care utilization

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14421
Brittany L. Ranchoff PhD, MPH, Kimberley H. Geissler PhD, Laura B. Attanasio PhD, Chanup Jeung PhD
{"title":"Association of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations and postpartum mental health care utilization","authors":"Brittany L. Ranchoff PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Kimberley H. Geissler PhD,&nbsp;Laura B. Attanasio PhD,&nbsp;Chanup Jeung PhD","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the association of Massachusetts Medicaid Accountable Care Organization (ACO) implementation with changes in mental health care utilization in the postpartum period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Setting and Design</h3>\n \n <p>We examine care for people with a birth covered by Medicaid or private insurance. We used a difference-in-differences design to compare differences before and after Medicaid ACO implementation for those with Medicaid versus those with private insurance. The primary outcome was a binary measure of having at least one outpatient mental health care visit in the 6 months postpartum. We estimated linear probability models controlling for age, prenatal mental illness, pregnancy complications, birth mode, and ZIP code characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources and Analytic Sample</h3>\n \n <p>Data are from the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database. The analytic sample included Massachusetts residents with a live birth between July 1, 2016, and September 30, 2019, with complete data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>107,813 births were included (53.0% Medicaid, 47.0% private). 7.8% of these had at least one outpatient mental health visit in the 6 months postpartum, with similar rates among those with Medicaid versus those with private insurance pre-ACO implementation (7.9% Medicaid versus 7.7% private). An increase in utilization among privately insured individuals and a decrease among Medicaid beneficiaries post-ACO implementation was observed. Regression-adjusted difference-in-differences estimates indicate that Medicaid ACO implementation was associated with a 1.3 percentage point [pp] decrease (95% confidence interval: 1.3 pp, −0.5 pp; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) in the probability of having an outpatient mental health visit for those with Medicaid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Medicaid ACO implementation was associated with decreases in use of outpatient mental health care in the postpartum period among people with Medicaid, overall and compared to those with private insurance. Future research should determine whether this increased disparity in mental health care utilization persists with maturation of the ACO delivery model.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"60 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the association of Massachusetts Medicaid Accountable Care Organization (ACO) implementation with changes in mental health care utilization in the postpartum period.

Study Setting and Design

We examine care for people with a birth covered by Medicaid or private insurance. We used a difference-in-differences design to compare differences before and after Medicaid ACO implementation for those with Medicaid versus those with private insurance. The primary outcome was a binary measure of having at least one outpatient mental health care visit in the 6 months postpartum. We estimated linear probability models controlling for age, prenatal mental illness, pregnancy complications, birth mode, and ZIP code characteristics.

Data Sources and Analytic Sample

Data are from the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database. The analytic sample included Massachusetts residents with a live birth between July 1, 2016, and September 30, 2019, with complete data.

Principal Findings

107,813 births were included (53.0% Medicaid, 47.0% private). 7.8% of these had at least one outpatient mental health visit in the 6 months postpartum, with similar rates among those with Medicaid versus those with private insurance pre-ACO implementation (7.9% Medicaid versus 7.7% private). An increase in utilization among privately insured individuals and a decrease among Medicaid beneficiaries post-ACO implementation was observed. Regression-adjusted difference-in-differences estimates indicate that Medicaid ACO implementation was associated with a 1.3 percentage point [pp] decrease (95% confidence interval: 1.3 pp, −0.5 pp; p < 0.01) in the probability of having an outpatient mental health visit for those with Medicaid.

Conclusions

Medicaid ACO implementation was associated with decreases in use of outpatient mental health care in the postpartum period among people with Medicaid, overall and compared to those with private insurance. Future research should determine whether this increased disparity in mental health care utilization persists with maturation of the ACO delivery model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗补助责任护理组织协会和产后精神卫生保健的利用。
目的:探讨马萨诸塞州医疗补助责任医疗组织(ACO)实施与产后心理保健利用变化的关系。研究设置和设计:我们检查了医疗补助或私人保险覆盖的人的生育护理。我们使用差异中的差异设计来比较医疗补助与私人保险实施前后的差异。主要结果是在产后6个月内至少有一次门诊精神卫生保健访问的二元测量。我们估计了控制年龄、产前精神疾病、妊娠并发症、出生方式和邮政编码特征的线性概率模型。数据来源和分析样本:数据来自马萨诸塞州所有付款人索赔数据库。分析样本包括2016年7月1日至2019年9月30日期间活产的马萨诸塞州居民,数据完整。主要发现:包括107,813例出生(53.0%的医疗补助,47.0%的私人)。其中7.8%的人在产后6个月内至少进行过一次门诊心理健康检查,医疗补助和私人保险实施前的比例相似(医疗补助和私人保险分别为7.9%和7.7%)。观察到在aco实施后,私人保险个人的使用率增加,医疗补助受益人的使用率下降。经回归校正的差异中差异估计表明,医疗补助ACO的实施与1.3个百分点[pp]的下降有关(95%置信区间:1.3 pp, -0.5 pp;结论:总体而言,与私人保险相比,医疗补助ACO的实施与医疗补助人群产后门诊精神卫生保健的使用减少有关。未来的研究应该确定,随着ACO交付模式的成熟,这种精神卫生保健利用的差距是否会持续增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Mind the Activation Gap: Factors Associated With Low Patient Activation Among Dual-Eligible Versus Medicare-Only Beneficiaries. Identifying Bariatric Surgery Patients With the Most Favorable Cost Outcomes. A Machine Learning Model to Improve Risk Adjustment Accuracy in Medicare. The All-Payer Claims Database After the Gobeille Supreme Court Decision: Assessing the Impact on Fatal Opioid-Related Overdose Research. Cost-Effectiveness of the Support and Services at Home (SASH) Program for Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Community-Based Approach to Healthy Aging in Place.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1