FAP-targeted PET/CT imaging in patients with breast cancer from a prospective bi-center study: insights into diagnosis and clinic management

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s00259-025-07108-2
Wei Guo, Weizhi Xu, Tinghua Meng, Chunlei Fan, Hao Fu, Yizhen Pang, Liang Zhao, Long Sun, Jingxiong Huang, Yanjun Mi, Xinlu Wang, Haojun Chen
{"title":"FAP-targeted PET/CT imaging in patients with breast cancer from a prospective bi-center study: insights into diagnosis and clinic management","authors":"Wei Guo, Weizhi Xu, Tinghua Meng, Chunlei Fan, Hao Fu, Yizhen Pang, Liang Zhao, Long Sun, Jingxiong Huang, Yanjun Mi, Xinlu Wang, Haojun Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07108-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-targeted PET/CT imaging in primary and metastatic breast cancer and compare the results with those of standard-of-care imaging (SCI) and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We prospectively analyzed patients with diagnosed or suspected breast cancer who underwent concomitant FAP-targeted PET/CT (radiotracers including either [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 or [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-42) and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT scans from June 2020 to January 2024 at two medical centers. Breast ultrasound (US) imaging was performed in all treatment-naïve patients as SCI. The SUVmax, tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), lesion detection rate, and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classifications between FAP-targeted and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT were evaluated and compared.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Sixty-one female patients (median age, 52 y; range, 28–82 y) were included. Among them, 23 patients underwent evaluation for a definitive diagnosis of suspected breast lesions, 15 underwent initial staging, and 23 were evaluated for the detection of recurrence. The sensitivities of breast US, [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG, and FAP-targeted PET/CT for detecting primary breast tumors were 82%, 79%, and 100%, respectively. Regarding the diagnosis of recurrent/metastatic lesions, the lesion-based detection rate of FAP-targeted PET/CT was significantly higher than that of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG, which included local and regional recurrence, neck lymph node (LN), abdomen LN, bone, and liver metastases. Compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, FAP-targeted PET/CT altered thirteen patients’ TNM staging/restaging (13/59, 22%) and nine patients’ clinical management (9/59, 15%). Compared to SCI, FAPI changed fourteen patients’ TNM staging/re-staging (14/59, 24%) and eleven patients’ therapeutic regimens(11/59, 19%). There was no significant association between FAPI-derived SUVmax and receptor status/histologic type in both primary and metastatic lesions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>FAP-targeted PET/CT was superior to [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG in diagnosing primary and metastatic breast cancer, with higher radiotracer uptake and TBR, especially in the detection of primary/recurrent tumors, abdominal LN metastases, liver, and bone metastases. FAP-targeted PET/CT is superior to [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and SCI in TNM staging and may improve tumor staging, recurrence detection, and implementation of necessary treatment modifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07108-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-targeted PET/CT imaging in primary and metastatic breast cancer and compare the results with those of standard-of-care imaging (SCI) and [18F]FDG PET/CT.

Methods

We prospectively analyzed patients with diagnosed or suspected breast cancer who underwent concomitant FAP-targeted PET/CT (radiotracers including either [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 or [18F]FAPI-42) and [18F]FDG PET/CT scans from June 2020 to January 2024 at two medical centers. Breast ultrasound (US) imaging was performed in all treatment-naïve patients as SCI. The SUVmax, tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), lesion detection rate, and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classifications between FAP-targeted and [18F]FDG PET/CT were evaluated and compared.

Results

Sixty-one female patients (median age, 52 y; range, 28–82 y) were included. Among them, 23 patients underwent evaluation for a definitive diagnosis of suspected breast lesions, 15 underwent initial staging, and 23 were evaluated for the detection of recurrence. The sensitivities of breast US, [18F]FDG, and FAP-targeted PET/CT for detecting primary breast tumors were 82%, 79%, and 100%, respectively. Regarding the diagnosis of recurrent/metastatic lesions, the lesion-based detection rate of FAP-targeted PET/CT was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG, which included local and regional recurrence, neck lymph node (LN), abdomen LN, bone, and liver metastases. Compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT, FAP-targeted PET/CT altered thirteen patients’ TNM staging/restaging (13/59, 22%) and nine patients’ clinical management (9/59, 15%). Compared to SCI, FAPI changed fourteen patients’ TNM staging/re-staging (14/59, 24%) and eleven patients’ therapeutic regimens(11/59, 19%). There was no significant association between FAPI-derived SUVmax and receptor status/histologic type in both primary and metastatic lesions.

Conclusion

FAP-targeted PET/CT was superior to [18F]FDG in diagnosing primary and metastatic breast cancer, with higher radiotracer uptake and TBR, especially in the detection of primary/recurrent tumors, abdominal LN metastases, liver, and bone metastases. FAP-targeted PET/CT is superior to [18F]FDG and SCI in TNM staging and may improve tumor staging, recurrence detection, and implementation of necessary treatment modifications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of deep learning-based scatter correction on a long-axial field-of-view PET scanner A hybrid [18F]fluoropivalate PET-multiparametric MRI to detect and characterise brain tumour metastases based on a permissive environment for monocarboxylate transport Robust whole-body PET image denoising using 3D diffusion models: evaluation across various scanners, tracers, and dose levels Optimizing MR-based attenuation correction in hybrid PET/MR using deep learning: validation with a flatbed insert and consistent patient positioning Unveiling the potential of copper-61 vs. gallium-68 for SSTR PET imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1