Clinical outcomes and feasibility of implementing outpatient labor induction with misoprostol: A prospective cohort study

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1111/aogs.15029
Kjersti Engen Marsdal, Ingvil Krarup Sørbye, Stine Bernitz, Nasreen Adan, Elin Baustad Grødal, Anne Flem Jacobsen, Mirjam Lukasse
{"title":"Clinical outcomes and feasibility of implementing outpatient labor induction with misoprostol: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Kjersti Engen Marsdal,&nbsp;Ingvil Krarup Sørbye,&nbsp;Stine Bernitz,&nbsp;Nasreen Adan,&nbsp;Elin Baustad Grødal,&nbsp;Anne Flem Jacobsen,&nbsp;Mirjam Lukasse","doi":"10.1111/aogs.15029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>In response to the increasing rates of induction of labor (IOL), outpatient IOL has emerged as a potential approach to enhance women's satisfaction while reducing costs and staffing requirements. There is a growing interest in oral misoprostol as an outpatient IOL method, particularly in the Nordic region. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and feasibility of implementing IOL with oral misoprostol as an outpatient procedure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter, prospective cohort study is part of the Labor Induction Inpatient and Outpatient (LINO) project (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04746248). Women with low-risk pregnancies undergoing IOL with oral misoprostol were offered outpatient treatment as an alternative to the standard inpatient approach. The primary outcome was the proportion of births and adverse events occurring before or within 30 min after admission, comparing outpatient and inpatient groups. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal safety and efficacy endpoints.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During the study period, 212 women were included in the study: 123 (58.0%) in the outpatient group and 89 (42.0%) in the inpatient group. No births occurred before admission to the hospital or within the first 30 min after admission. Adverse events were rare, and there were no significant differences in safety outcomes between the groups. The duration from hospital admission to giving birth was significantly shorter among women in the outpatient group as compared to the inpatient group (12.3 h vs. 28.1 h, <i>p</i> = 0.001). In the outpatient group, 76.4% of the women completed the misoprostol treatment as outpatients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this study of 212 women undergoing IOL with oral misoprostol, we found similar safety outcomes between women who chose outpatient IOL and those who chose inpatient IOL. The outpatient group had significantly shorter hospital stays before giving birth, and more than three in four women in the outpatient group completed the misoprostol treatment as outpatients. While larger studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions, our study suggests that implementing oral misoprostol in an outpatient IOL protocol may represent a safe and feasible alternative.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"104 4","pages":"647-657"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aogs.15029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.15029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In response to the increasing rates of induction of labor (IOL), outpatient IOL has emerged as a potential approach to enhance women's satisfaction while reducing costs and staffing requirements. There is a growing interest in oral misoprostol as an outpatient IOL method, particularly in the Nordic region. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and feasibility of implementing IOL with oral misoprostol as an outpatient procedure.

Material and Methods

This multicenter, prospective cohort study is part of the Labor Induction Inpatient and Outpatient (LINO) project (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04746248). Women with low-risk pregnancies undergoing IOL with oral misoprostol were offered outpatient treatment as an alternative to the standard inpatient approach. The primary outcome was the proportion of births and adverse events occurring before or within 30 min after admission, comparing outpatient and inpatient groups. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal safety and efficacy endpoints.

Results

During the study period, 212 women were included in the study: 123 (58.0%) in the outpatient group and 89 (42.0%) in the inpatient group. No births occurred before admission to the hospital or within the first 30 min after admission. Adverse events were rare, and there were no significant differences in safety outcomes between the groups. The duration from hospital admission to giving birth was significantly shorter among women in the outpatient group as compared to the inpatient group (12.3 h vs. 28.1 h, p = 0.001). In the outpatient group, 76.4% of the women completed the misoprostol treatment as outpatients.

Conclusions

In this study of 212 women undergoing IOL with oral misoprostol, we found similar safety outcomes between women who chose outpatient IOL and those who chose inpatient IOL. The outpatient group had significantly shorter hospital stays before giving birth, and more than three in four women in the outpatient group completed the misoprostol treatment as outpatients. While larger studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions, our study suggests that implementing oral misoprostol in an outpatient IOL protocol may represent a safe and feasible alternative.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊应用米索前列醇引产的临床效果和可行性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
导论:为了应对日益增长的人工智能(IOL)率,门诊人工智能(IOL)已成为一种潜在的方法,以提高妇女的满意度,同时降低成本和人员需求。口服米索前列醇作为门诊人工晶状体方法的兴趣越来越大,特别是在北欧地区。本研究旨在评估口服米索前列醇作为门诊手术实施人工晶状体的临床结果和可行性。材料和方法:这项多中心、前瞻性队列研究是引产住院和门诊(LINO)项目的一部分(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04746248)。采用口服米索前列醇进行人工晶状体植入术的低风险妊娠妇女被提供门诊治疗,作为标准住院治疗的替代方法。主要结局是出生比例和入院前或入院后30分钟内发生的不良事件,比较门诊组和住院组。次要终点包括孕产妇和新生儿的安全性和有效性终点。结果:研究期间共纳入212名妇女,其中门诊组123名(58.0%),住院组89名(42.0%)。入院前或入院后30分钟内未分娩。不良事件很少发生,两组之间的安全性结果无显著差异。门诊组妇女从入院到分娩的时间明显短于住院组(12.3小时比28.1小时,p = 0.001)。在门诊组,76.4%的女性完成了门诊米索前列醇治疗。结论:在这项研究中,212名接受口服米索前列醇人工晶状体的妇女,我们发现选择门诊人工晶状体和选择住院人工晶状体的妇女之间的安全性结果相似。门诊组分娩前住院时间明显缩短,门诊组超过四分之三的妇女作为门诊患者完成了米索前列醇治疗。虽然需要更大的研究来得出明确的结论,但我们的研究表明,在门诊人工晶体治疗方案中实施口服米索前列醇可能是一种安全可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Perinatal and long-term implications of diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus using only fasting and one-hour post-load glucose concentrations: Secondary analysis of the GEMS trial and its five-year follow-up. Prediction of preterm birth using 3D volume cesarean scar morphology in pregnant women with previous advanced labor cesarean delivery. Intrapartum CTG characteristics associated with isolated single umbilical artery in term fetuses: A matched case-control study. 1 g/h magnesium sulfate maintenance for eclampsia prevention is enough. Normative range for MRI amniotic fluid volume from 16 to 36 gestational weeks: Absolute and relative values, and correlation to ultrasound.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1