Subcutaneous Lower Pole Release as Double Bubble Prevention in Constricted Base Breasts: The "Plus One" Augmentation Technique.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Aesthetic Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1093/asj/sjaf014
Sonia Fertsch, Andreas Wolter, Alberto Rancati, Claudio Angrigiani, Matthias Voigt, Christoph Andree
{"title":"Subcutaneous Lower Pole Release as Double Bubble Prevention in Constricted Base Breasts: The \"Plus One\" Augmentation Technique.","authors":"Sonia Fertsch, Andreas Wolter, Alberto Rancati, Claudio Angrigiani, Matthias Voigt, Christoph Andree","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breasts with a broad base, constricted inframammary fold (IMF) and a short distance between the nipple and the IMF are predisposed to form a double bubble (DB) deformity. Most publications have focused on the correction of a DB rather than on its prevention and thorough analysis of the IMF.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Introduction of a third dissection plane in breast augmentation for preventing or correcting DB deformities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis conducted by a single surgeon, involving 46 patients with a well-defined constricted IMF who underwent breast augmentation with the 'Plus One' technique between 2019 and 2021. Women who required mastopexy were excluded. All procedures were analyzed for lower pole curvature using visual and graphical photographic analysis. The lower pole breast contour was plotted as a graph for better comparison of outcomes. Breast-Q surveys were conducted before and 3 months after surgery. Follow-ups were done at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The curve of the postoperative lower pole was convex in 96% of the cases. In 4%, the curve tends to straighten out in the lower pole. In one case, the curve became concave at one point indicating a DB deformity, making a DB complication rate of 2%. The mean preoperative satisfaction score was 43±2, and the postoperative satisfaction score was 94±3 on the BREAST-Q scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \"plus one\" method showed stable and satisfying results and is easily reproducible with a low complication rate. This can also be used as either a prophylactic or corrective measure.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breasts with a broad base, constricted inframammary fold (IMF) and a short distance between the nipple and the IMF are predisposed to form a double bubble (DB) deformity. Most publications have focused on the correction of a DB rather than on its prevention and thorough analysis of the IMF.

Objectives: Introduction of a third dissection plane in breast augmentation for preventing or correcting DB deformities.

Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis conducted by a single surgeon, involving 46 patients with a well-defined constricted IMF who underwent breast augmentation with the 'Plus One' technique between 2019 and 2021. Women who required mastopexy were excluded. All procedures were analyzed for lower pole curvature using visual and graphical photographic analysis. The lower pole breast contour was plotted as a graph for better comparison of outcomes. Breast-Q surveys were conducted before and 3 months after surgery. Follow-ups were done at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery.

Results: The curve of the postoperative lower pole was convex in 96% of the cases. In 4%, the curve tends to straighten out in the lower pole. In one case, the curve became concave at one point indicating a DB deformity, making a DB complication rate of 2%. The mean preoperative satisfaction score was 43±2, and the postoperative satisfaction score was 94±3 on the BREAST-Q scale.

Conclusions: The "plus one" method showed stable and satisfying results and is easily reproducible with a low complication rate. This can also be used as either a prophylactic or corrective measure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
期刊最新文献
Arterioembolic Characteristics of Differentially Diluted CaHA-CMC Gels Within an Artificial Macrovascular Perfusion Model. The Occurrence of Health Symptoms in General Practice Before and After the Explantation of Cosmetic Breast Implants. Correction to: Breast Pocket Lavage With Clindamycin Solution for Silicone Removal After Implant Rupture. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) in 252 Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons: Prevalences, ACE Clustering, and Effects on Adult Health and Behaviors, Including Self-Defined Depression, Work Addiction, and Burnout. IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results From Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1