Short and Mid-term Outcome of Radiofrequency Ablation without Concomitant Phlebectomy/Sclerotherapy for Tributary Varicose Veins.

Abstract

Endovenous surgery in the treatment of varicose veins generally consists of laser or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as endovenous thermal ablation (ETA) with a phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy of tributary varicose veins to improve symptomatic or cosmetic problems. Nevertheless, the efficacy of their concomitant treatments is still controversial for a decade. In the guidelines of the Japanese Society of Phlebology, concomitant phlebectomy of tributary varicose veins with ETA is described that it is not recommended officially. In our hospital, RFA without concomitant phlebectomy of tributary varicose veins accounts for 74% of the RFA cases and it shows a relatively higher percentage than other institutions in Japan. The data of RFA without concomitant phlebectomy of tributary varicose veins are evenly matched in RFA with concomitant treatments in our data concerning recurrence, remnants, endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT), and complications. This article provides the conclusion that it would be acceptable to perform isolated RFA compared to RFA with concomitant phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy of tributary varicose veins in short- and mid-term periods. In addition, concomitant treatments might contribute to rapid improvement of the short-term and better long-term outcomes, not to mention cosmetic problems that are not identified demonstrably. (This is a translation of J Jpn Coll Angiol 2022; 62: 49-54.).