"If that would have lessened my symptoms, that would have been great...": a qualitative study about the acceptability of tecovirimat as treatment for mpox.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03840-y
Sara Paparini, Rosalie Hayes, Benjamin Weil, Will Nutland, Ismael Maatouk, Teodora Wi, Chloe M Orkin, Rosamund Lewis
{"title":"\"If that would have lessened my symptoms, that would have been great...\": a qualitative study about the acceptability of tecovirimat as treatment for mpox.","authors":"Sara Paparini, Rosalie Hayes, Benjamin Weil, Will Nutland, Ismael Maatouk, Teodora Wi, Chloe M Orkin, Rosamund Lewis","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03840-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tecovirimat, an antiviral treatment for smallpox, was approved as a treatment for mpox by the European Medicines Agency in January 2022. Approval was granted under \"exceptional circumstances\" based on effectiveness found in pre-clinical challenge studies in animals and safety studies in humans showing minimal side effects. As clinical efficacy studies are still ongoing, there is currently limited information with regard to the acceptability of tecovirimat to treat mpox. The aim of this study is to understand prospective acceptability of use of tecovirimat as treatment for mpox.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A co-produced, qualitative, focus group study design was conducted with a theoretically informed sample of people from communities at higher risk and with experience of mpox illness. Thirteen participants took part: all self-identified as cisgender male, 1 self-identified as Black British, 1 as British Asian, 5 as White, 3 as White British, 3 as White Other. Inclusion criteria were as follows: experience of mpox illness; age 18 and over; living in the United Kingdom (UK); living in the UK during 2022 mpox outbreak. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using a combination inductive and deductive coding informed by the Treatment Acceptability Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Very few participants were aware of tecovirimat as a treatment option and none were offered it during their mpox illness. Key factors influencing acceptability found in this study were as follows: levels of trust in medicine; level of information; provider communication approach; quality of experience of mpox care. Marginalised communities at highest risk of mpox may have prior experience of structural discrimination which can greatly influence treatment acceptability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study suggest that offering tecovirimat (or comparable emergency-licensed treatments) to people with mpox is acceptable, although uptake will depend on knowledge of mpox treatment options, trust in medicine and medical professionals and provision of relevant information and choice. To increase acceptability of such treatments, clinicians should ensure patients are aware of mpox symptom management options, including pain relief; acknowledge and address patient concerns upfront and within the context of non-stigmatising care; and communicate offers in a consistent and supportive manner in line with locally approved eligibility criteria and protocols at the time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03840-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tecovirimat, an antiviral treatment for smallpox, was approved as a treatment for mpox by the European Medicines Agency in January 2022. Approval was granted under "exceptional circumstances" based on effectiveness found in pre-clinical challenge studies in animals and safety studies in humans showing minimal side effects. As clinical efficacy studies are still ongoing, there is currently limited information with regard to the acceptability of tecovirimat to treat mpox. The aim of this study is to understand prospective acceptability of use of tecovirimat as treatment for mpox.

Methods: A co-produced, qualitative, focus group study design was conducted with a theoretically informed sample of people from communities at higher risk and with experience of mpox illness. Thirteen participants took part: all self-identified as cisgender male, 1 self-identified as Black British, 1 as British Asian, 5 as White, 3 as White British, 3 as White Other. Inclusion criteria were as follows: experience of mpox illness; age 18 and over; living in the United Kingdom (UK); living in the UK during 2022 mpox outbreak. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using a combination inductive and deductive coding informed by the Treatment Acceptability Framework.

Results: Very few participants were aware of tecovirimat as a treatment option and none were offered it during their mpox illness. Key factors influencing acceptability found in this study were as follows: levels of trust in medicine; level of information; provider communication approach; quality of experience of mpox care. Marginalised communities at highest risk of mpox may have prior experience of structural discrimination which can greatly influence treatment acceptability.

Conclusions: This exploratory study suggest that offering tecovirimat (or comparable emergency-licensed treatments) to people with mpox is acceptable, although uptake will depend on knowledge of mpox treatment options, trust in medicine and medical professionals and provision of relevant information and choice. To increase acceptability of such treatments, clinicians should ensure patients are aware of mpox symptom management options, including pain relief; acknowledge and address patient concerns upfront and within the context of non-stigmatising care; and communicate offers in a consistent and supportive manner in line with locally approved eligibility criteria and protocols at the time.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“如果这能减轻我的症状,那就太好了……”对特可维司麦治疗痘的可接受性进行定性研究。
背景:Tecovirimat是一种用于天花的抗病毒药物,于2022年1月被欧洲药品管理局批准用于治疗m痘。在“特殊情况下”,基于动物临床前挑战研究的有效性和人类安全性研究显示的最小副作用,批准了该药物。由于临床疗效研究仍在进行中,目前关于替科维莫治疗m痘的可接受性的信息有限。本研究的目的是了解使用特可韦司麦治疗m痘的可接受性。方法:采用一项共同制作的定性焦点小组研究设计,对来自高风险社区和有过麻疹疾病经历的人群进行了理论上知情的样本。13名参与者:所有人自认为是顺性男性,1人自认为是英国黑人,1人自认为是英国亚裔,5人自认为是白人,3人自认为是英国白人,3人自认为是其他白人。入选标准如下:有过麻疹病史;18岁及以上;居住在英国(UK);在2022年麻疹爆发期间居住在英国。焦点小组被记录,转录和主题分析使用归纳和演绎编码结合治疗可接受性框架。结果:很少参与者意识到替科韦司麦是一种治疗选择,没有人在他们的m痘疾病期间提供它。本研究发现影响可接受性的主要因素有:对医学的信任程度;信息水平;供应商沟通方式;麻疹护理经验的质量。m痘风险最高的边缘化社区可能有结构性歧视的经验,这可能极大地影响治疗的可接受性。结论:这项探索性研究表明,向mpox患者提供tecovirimat(或类似的紧急许可治疗)是可以接受的,尽管是否接受将取决于对mpox治疗方案的了解、对医学和医疗专业人员的信任以及提供相关信息和选择。为了提高这类治疗的可接受性,临床医生应确保患者了解痘症状管理方案,包括缓解疼痛;在非污名化护理的背景下,预先承认并解决患者的关切;并以一致和支持的方式与当地批准的资格标准和协议沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Multi-omics analysis reveals sex-specific etiology of human muscle weakness following musculoskeletal injury. Trainee-delivered school-based intervention with guided narrative writing for adolescent anxiety and depression: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Risk classification of internet gaming disorder based on neurobiological subtyping from impulsivity-linked resting-state functional connectivity: a longitudinal design study. Perceptions of HPV vaccination: a qualitative study with adolescents, parents, school staff, and pharmacists. Clinical epidemiology and risk prediction of unsuccessful treatment outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis with diabetes mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1