Impacted lower third molar classification and difficulty index assessment: comparisons among dental students, general practitioners and deep learning model assistance.

Abstract

Background: Assessing the difficulty of impacted lower third molar (ILTM) surgical extraction is crucial for predicting postoperative complications and estimating procedure duration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a convolutional neural network (CNN) in determining the angulation, position, classification and difficulty index (DI) of ILTM. Additionally, we compared these parameters and the time required for interpretation among deep learning (DL) models, sixth-year dental students (DSs), and general dental practitioners (GPs) with and without CNN assistance.

Materials and methods: The dataset included cropped panoramic radiographs of 1200 ILTMs. The parameters examined were ILTM angulation, class, and position. The radiographs were randomly split into test datasets, while the remaining images were utilized for training and validation. Data augmentation techniques were applied. Another set of radiographs was used to compare the accuracy between human experts and the top-performing CNN. This dataset was also given to DSs and GPs. The participants were instructed to classify the parameters of the ILTMs both with and without the aid of the best-performing CNN model. The results, as well as the Pederson DI and time taken for both groups with and without CNN assistance, were statistically analyzed.

Results: All the selected CNN models successfully classified ILTM angulation, class, and position. Within the DS and GP groups, the accuracy and kappa scores were significantly greater when CNN assistance was used. Among the groups, performance tests without CNN assistance revealed no significant differences in any category. However, compared with DSs, GPs took significantly less time for the class and total time, a trend that persisted when CNN assistance was used. With the CNN, the GPs achieved significantly higher accuracy and kappa scores for class classification than the DSs did (p = 0.035 and 0.010). Conversely, the DS group, with the CNN, exhibited higher accuracy and kappa scores for position classification than did the GP group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The CNN can achieve accuracies ranging from 87 to 96% for ILTM classification. With the assistance of the CNN, both DSs and GPs exhibited significantly higher accuracy in ILTM classification. Additionally, compared with DSs with and without CNN assistance, GPs took significantly less time to inspect the class and overall.