Effect of different doses of ciprofol on hemodynamics induced by general anesthesia in elderly diabetic patients undergoing spinal surgery: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02881-3
Xiaorui Jiang, Linzhong Zhang, Jiawei Ji, Yan Jing, Meiping Li
{"title":"Effect of different doses of ciprofol on hemodynamics induced by general anesthesia in elderly diabetic patients undergoing spinal surgery: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study.","authors":"Xiaorui Jiang, Linzhong Zhang, Jiawei Ji, Yan Jing, Meiping Li","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02881-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of different doses of ciprofol for the induction of general anesthesia in elderly patients with diabetes undergoing spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety elderly diabetic patients scheduled for elective single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) under general anesthesia were enrolled and randomly assigned to three groups according to the induction dose of ciprofol: group A (0.2 mg/kg), Group B (0.3 mg/kg), and Group C (0.4 mg/kg). The safety and efficacy of anesthesia induction were compared among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>The incidence of hypotension in Group C (46.4%) was significantly higher than that in Groups A (7.4%) and B (14.8%) (P < 0.05). The area under the time-mean arterial pressure curve (AUT<sub>MAP</sub>) was significantly greater in Group C (176.39 ± 33.83 mmHg·min) than in Group B (158.44 ± 26.55 mmHg·min) and Group A (143.59 ± 19.52 mmHg·min) (P < 0.05). The incidence of intubation response was highest in Group A (77.8%, P < 0.05). Significant differences in bispectral index (BIS) values were observed at 3, 4, and 5 min post-administration among the groups CONCLUSIONS: The induction regimen of 0.3 mg/kg ciprofol combined with 0.4 µg/kg sufentanil and 0.7 mg/kg rocuronium provided superior hemodynamic stability and reduced the need for vasoactive drugs in elderly diabetic patients. This regimen was found to be more favorable compared to the 0.2 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg ciprofol dosing groups, demonstrating an optimal balance of safety and efficacy during anesthesia induction in this high-risk population. This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on February 26, 2024 (Registration Number: ChiCTR2400081164).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02881-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of different doses of ciprofol for the induction of general anesthesia in elderly patients with diabetes undergoing spinal surgery.

Methods: Ninety elderly diabetic patients scheduled for elective single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) under general anesthesia were enrolled and randomly assigned to three groups according to the induction dose of ciprofol: group A (0.2 mg/kg), Group B (0.3 mg/kg), and Group C (0.4 mg/kg). The safety and efficacy of anesthesia induction were compared among the three groups.

Case presentation: The incidence of hypotension in Group C (46.4%) was significantly higher than that in Groups A (7.4%) and B (14.8%) (P < 0.05). The area under the time-mean arterial pressure curve (AUTMAP) was significantly greater in Group C (176.39 ± 33.83 mmHg·min) than in Group B (158.44 ± 26.55 mmHg·min) and Group A (143.59 ± 19.52 mmHg·min) (P < 0.05). The incidence of intubation response was highest in Group A (77.8%, P < 0.05). Significant differences in bispectral index (BIS) values were observed at 3, 4, and 5 min post-administration among the groups CONCLUSIONS: The induction regimen of 0.3 mg/kg ciprofol combined with 0.4 µg/kg sufentanil and 0.7 mg/kg rocuronium provided superior hemodynamic stability and reduced the need for vasoactive drugs in elderly diabetic patients. This regimen was found to be more favorable compared to the 0.2 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg ciprofol dosing groups, demonstrating an optimal balance of safety and efficacy during anesthesia induction in this high-risk population. This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on February 26, 2024 (Registration Number: ChiCTR2400081164).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Mortality and patient disposition after ICU tracheostomy for secretion management vs. prolonged ventilation: a retrospective cohort study. Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoring. Opioid sparing anesthesia in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing liver resection: a controlled randomized double-blind study. "The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty". A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting perioperative transfusion in children undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1