Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and the risk of Atrial Fibrillation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1186/s12872-024-04442-5
Xiaoyan Liang, Jianghong Dai, Feifei Wang
{"title":"Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and the risk of Atrial Fibrillation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiaoyan Liang, Jianghong Dai, Feifei Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12872-024-04442-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies showed higher risks of cardiovascular complications to have been observed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter have been more pronounced in patients with hyperglycemia. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are now considered as second-line treatment for patients with T2DM following inadequate glycemic control with first line agents. In this analysis, we aimed to compare the risk of AF in patients with T2DM who were treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant publications comparing AF in patients with T2DM treated by SGLT-2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors were searched through electronic databases. AF was the clinical endpoint in this analysis. Revman 5.4 software was used to carry out this analysis. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies with a total number of 1,019,476 participants with T2DM were included in this analysis whereby 480,549 patients were assigned to SGLT-2 inhibitors and 538,927 patients were assigned to DPP-4 inhibitors. Result of this analysis showed SGLT-2 inhibitors to be associated with a significantly lower risk of AF compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in these patients with T2DM (RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.39 - 0.85; P = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the result of this analysis, the risk of AF was significantly reduced with SGLT-2 inhibitors when compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in these patients with T2DM. This hypothesis should be confirmed in future larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04442-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several studies showed higher risks of cardiovascular complications to have been observed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter have been more pronounced in patients with hyperglycemia. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are now considered as second-line treatment for patients with T2DM following inadequate glycemic control with first line agents. In this analysis, we aimed to compare the risk of AF in patients with T2DM who were treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors.

Methods: Relevant publications comparing AF in patients with T2DM treated by SGLT-2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors were searched through electronic databases. AF was the clinical endpoint in this analysis. Revman 5.4 software was used to carry out this analysis. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the outcome.

Results: Eleven studies with a total number of 1,019,476 participants with T2DM were included in this analysis whereby 480,549 patients were assigned to SGLT-2 inhibitors and 538,927 patients were assigned to DPP-4 inhibitors. Result of this analysis showed SGLT-2 inhibitors to be associated with a significantly lower risk of AF compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in these patients with T2DM (RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.39 - 0.85; P = 0.006).

Conclusions: Based on the result of this analysis, the risk of AF was significantly reduced with SGLT-2 inhibitors when compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in these patients with T2DM. This hypothesis should be confirmed in future larger studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
期刊最新文献
The effect of Tai Chi on plasma homocysteine in 1176 adults: a propensity score matching-based study. Association between lactate dehydrogenase levels and all-cause mortality in ICU patients with heart failure: a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database. Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and the risk of Atrial Fibrillation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Impact of kidney volume on incidence of in-hospital kidney-related adverse outcomes in patients with acute heart failure. Cardiovascular disease essential medicines listing by countries: changes over time and association with health outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1