A meta-core outcome set for stillbirth prevention and bereavement care following stillbirth in LMIC.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017688
Kushupika Dube, Farai Marenga, Elizabeth Ombeva Ayebare, Carol Bedwell, Nasim Chaudhry, Idesi Chilinda, Angela Chimwaza, Declan Devane, Sudhindrashayana Fattepur, Unice Goshomi, Tayyeba Kiran, Rose Laisser, Tina Lavender, Tracey A Mills, Allen Nabisere, Zaib Un Nisa, Bellington Vwalika, Sabina Wakasiaka, Jamie J Kirkham
{"title":"A meta-core outcome set for stillbirth prevention and bereavement care following stillbirth in LMIC.","authors":"Kushupika Dube, Farai Marenga, Elizabeth Ombeva Ayebare, Carol Bedwell, Nasim Chaudhry, Idesi Chilinda, Angela Chimwaza, Declan Devane, Sudhindrashayana Fattepur, Unice Goshomi, Tayyeba Kiran, Rose Laisser, Tina Lavender, Tracey A Mills, Allen Nabisere, Zaib Un Nisa, Bellington Vwalika, Sabina Wakasiaka, Jamie J Kirkham","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>Stillbirth is burdensome in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Currently, there are two core outcome sets (COS) for stillbirth (prevention and bereavement care), but these were developed with limited reflection of the needs of parents in an LMIC setting. To address this gap, the objective of this study was to establish consensus on the most important outcomes for stillbirth prevention and bereavement care following stillbirth in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Previous stillbirth outcomes were reviewed for inclusion into the COS by senior research leaders and community engagement and involvement members from six sub-Saharan African and two South Asian countries. An online real-time Delphi survey was then conducted with healthcare professionals, parents who have experienced a stillbirth and researchers in the field to score the agreed list. The results of the Delphi were summarised and then discussed at a virtual consensus meeting where the final COS were agreed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>287 participants contributed towards the Delphi (143 midwives, 32 obstetricians, 50 mothers, 12 fathers and 50 researchers), with at least 2 parents attending the full consensus meetings. Consensus was reached on 13 core outcomes for stillbirth prevention covering 5 domains: obstetric, fetal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes and maternal complications. For bereavement care following a stillbirth, five core outcomes reached a consensus, which included outcomes related to labour and birth, a postpartum complication, care experience, mental health and emotional and social well-being.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These COS will improve the consistency of outcomes for future research in an LMIC setting. Additionally, they will complement existing COS for stillbirth prevention and bereavement care developed in high-income settings. The output from this work will move us towards a global set of outcomes that can be used in stillbirth research worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: Stillbirth is burdensome in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Currently, there are two core outcome sets (COS) for stillbirth (prevention and bereavement care), but these were developed with limited reflection of the needs of parents in an LMIC setting. To address this gap, the objective of this study was to establish consensus on the most important outcomes for stillbirth prevention and bereavement care following stillbirth in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.

Methods: Previous stillbirth outcomes were reviewed for inclusion into the COS by senior research leaders and community engagement and involvement members from six sub-Saharan African and two South Asian countries. An online real-time Delphi survey was then conducted with healthcare professionals, parents who have experienced a stillbirth and researchers in the field to score the agreed list. The results of the Delphi were summarised and then discussed at a virtual consensus meeting where the final COS were agreed.

Results: 287 participants contributed towards the Delphi (143 midwives, 32 obstetricians, 50 mothers, 12 fathers and 50 researchers), with at least 2 parents attending the full consensus meetings. Consensus was reached on 13 core outcomes for stillbirth prevention covering 5 domains: obstetric, fetal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes and maternal complications. For bereavement care following a stillbirth, five core outcomes reached a consensus, which included outcomes related to labour and birth, a postpartum complication, care experience, mental health and emotional and social well-being.

Discussion: These COS will improve the consistency of outcomes for future research in an LMIC setting. Additionally, they will complement existing COS for stillbirth prevention and bereavement care developed in high-income settings. The output from this work will move us towards a global set of outcomes that can be used in stillbirth research worldwide.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低收入和中等收入国家死产预防和丧亲护理的meta核心结果集。
研究目的:死产在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)是一种负担,特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚。目前,死产有两个核心结果集(COS)(预防和丧亲护理),但这些结果集的制定对低收入和中等收入国家父母需求的反映有限。为了解决这一差距,本研究的目的是就撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚地区死产预防和死产后丧亲护理的最重要结果达成共识。方法:来自六个撒哈拉以南非洲国家和两个南亚国家的高级研究领导和社区参与和参与成员对以前的死产结果进行了审查,以纳入COS。然后,对医疗保健专业人员、经历过死产的父母和该领域的研究人员进行了在线实时德尔菲调查,以对商定的清单进行评分。德尔菲的结果进行总结,然后在虚拟协商一致会议上讨论,最终COS达成一致意见。结果:287名参与者(143名助产士,32名产科医生,50名母亲,12名父亲和50名研究人员)参与了德尔菲,至少有2名家长参加了完整的共识会议。就预防死产的13项核心结果达成共识,涵盖5个领域:产科、胎儿、围产期和新生儿结局以及孕产妇并发症。对于死产后的丧亲护理,达成了五项核心结果的共识,其中包括与分娩和分娩有关的结果、产后并发症、护理经验、心理健康以及情感和社会福祉。讨论:这些COS将提高LMIC环境下未来研究结果的一致性。此外,它们将补充高收入环境中为死产预防和丧亲护理制定的现有COS。这项工作的成果将使我们朝着一套可用于全世界死产研究的全球性成果迈进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
US Presidential Party switches are mirrored in global maternal mortality. Critical care capacity in Africa: postpandemic ICU capacity, service readiness and patient profiles across public and private hospitals in Ethiopia. From childhood malnutrition to adult mental illness: COVID-19 and the hidden legacy of malnutrition. State capacity and health system financing: a cross-country analysis. Trends in government and donor funding for vertical and horizontal community health worker programmes in sub-Saharan Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1