Automatic multimodal registration of cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Oral Investigations Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s00784-025-06183-x
Qianhan Zheng, Yongjia Wu, Jiahao Chen, Xiaozhe Wang, Mengqi Zhou, Huimin Li, Jiaqi Lin, Weifang Zhang, Xuepeng Chen
{"title":"Automatic multimodal registration of cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Qianhan Zheng, Yongjia Wu, Jiahao Chen, Xiaozhe Wang, Mengqi Zhou, Huimin Li, Jiaqi Lin, Weifang Zhang, Xuepeng Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06183-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate recent advances in the automatic multimodal registration of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans (IOS) and their clinical significance in dentistry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2024 across the PubMed, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases, including studies that were published in the past decade. The inclusion criteria were as follows: English-language studies, randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and retrospective studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 493 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 14 studies used geometry-based methods, 7 used artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, and 1 compared the accuracy of both approaches. Geometry-based methods primarily utilize two-stage coarse-to-fine registration algorithms, which require relatively fewer computational resources. In contrast, AI methods leverage advanced deep learning models, achieving significant improvements in automation and robustness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recent advances in CBCT and IOS registration technologies have considerably increased the efficiency and accuracy of 3D dental modelling, and these technologies show promise for application in orthodontics, implantology, and oral surgery. Geometry-based algorithms deliver reliable performance with low computational demand, whereas AI-driven approaches demonstrate significant potential for achieving fully automated and highly accurate registration. Future research should focus on challenges such as unstable registration landmarks or limited dataset diversity, to ensure their stability in complex clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 2","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06183-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate recent advances in the automatic multimodal registration of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans (IOS) and their clinical significance in dentistry.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2024 across the PubMed, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases, including studies that were published in the past decade. The inclusion criteria were as follows: English-language studies, randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and retrospective studies.

Results: Of the 493 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 14 studies used geometry-based methods, 7 used artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, and 1 compared the accuracy of both approaches. Geometry-based methods primarily utilize two-stage coarse-to-fine registration algorithms, which require relatively fewer computational resources. In contrast, AI methods leverage advanced deep learning models, achieving significant improvements in automation and robustness.

Conclusions: Recent advances in CBCT and IOS registration technologies have considerably increased the efficiency and accuracy of 3D dental modelling, and these technologies show promise for application in orthodontics, implantology, and oral surgery. Geometry-based algorithms deliver reliable performance with low computational demand, whereas AI-driven approaches demonstrate significant potential for achieving fully automated and highly accurate registration. Future research should focus on challenges such as unstable registration landmarks or limited dataset diversity, to ensure their stability in complex clinical scenarios.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锥形束计算机断层扫描和口腔内扫描的自动多模态配准:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:评价锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和口腔内扫描(IOS)自动多模态配准的最新进展及其在口腔医学中的临床意义。方法:于2024年10月在PubMed、Web of Science和IEEE explore数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,包括过去十年发表的研究。纳入标准如下:英语研究、随机和非随机对照试验、队列研究、病例对照研究、横断面研究和回顾性研究。结果:纳入的493篇文献中,22篇符合纳入标准。其中,14项研究使用基于几何的方法,7项研究使用人工智能(AI)技术,1项研究比较了两种方法的准确性。基于几何的方法主要采用两阶段粗到精配准算法,所需的计算资源相对较少。相比之下,人工智能方法利用先进的深度学习模型,在自动化和鲁棒性方面取得了重大进步。结论:CBCT和IOS配准技术的最新进展大大提高了牙齿三维建模的效率和准确性,这些技术在正畸学、种植学和口腔外科中具有广阔的应用前景。基于几何的算法提供了可靠的性能和低计算需求,而人工智能驱动的方法在实现全自动和高精度配准方面显示出巨大的潜力。未来的研究应关注注册标志不稳定或数据集多样性有限等挑战,以确保其在复杂临床场景中的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
期刊最新文献
Dimensional and colorimetric changes of keratinized tissue following free gingival grafts around teeth: a prospective clinical study. Antibiotic resistance in odontogenic infections: A systematic review of current evidence and implications for guideline-based therapy. Caries prevention in permanent teeth - basic recommendations of the German S 3 guideline. Quality assessment of anterior composite restorations: clinical examination versus three digital photographic techniques. Oral microbiome profiling of primary oral candidiasis during infection and post-antifungal therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1