{"title":"Automatic multimodal registration of cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Qianhan Zheng, Yongjia Wu, Jiahao Chen, Xiaozhe Wang, Mengqi Zhou, Huimin Li, Jiaqi Lin, Weifang Zhang, Xuepeng Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06183-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate recent advances in the automatic multimodal registration of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans (IOS) and their clinical significance in dentistry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2024 across the PubMed, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases, including studies that were published in the past decade. The inclusion criteria were as follows: English-language studies, randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and retrospective studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 493 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 14 studies used geometry-based methods, 7 used artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, and 1 compared the accuracy of both approaches. Geometry-based methods primarily utilize two-stage coarse-to-fine registration algorithms, which require relatively fewer computational resources. In contrast, AI methods leverage advanced deep learning models, achieving significant improvements in automation and robustness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recent advances in CBCT and IOS registration technologies have considerably increased the efficiency and accuracy of 3D dental modelling, and these technologies show promise for application in orthodontics, implantology, and oral surgery. Geometry-based algorithms deliver reliable performance with low computational demand, whereas AI-driven approaches demonstrate significant potential for achieving fully automated and highly accurate registration. Future research should focus on challenges such as unstable registration landmarks or limited dataset diversity, to ensure their stability in complex clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 2","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06183-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate recent advances in the automatic multimodal registration of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans (IOS) and their clinical significance in dentistry.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2024 across the PubMed, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases, including studies that were published in the past decade. The inclusion criteria were as follows: English-language studies, randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and retrospective studies.
Results: Of the 493 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 14 studies used geometry-based methods, 7 used artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, and 1 compared the accuracy of both approaches. Geometry-based methods primarily utilize two-stage coarse-to-fine registration algorithms, which require relatively fewer computational resources. In contrast, AI methods leverage advanced deep learning models, achieving significant improvements in automation and robustness.
Conclusions: Recent advances in CBCT and IOS registration technologies have considerably increased the efficiency and accuracy of 3D dental modelling, and these technologies show promise for application in orthodontics, implantology, and oral surgery. Geometry-based algorithms deliver reliable performance with low computational demand, whereas AI-driven approaches demonstrate significant potential for achieving fully automated and highly accurate registration. Future research should focus on challenges such as unstable registration landmarks or limited dataset diversity, to ensure their stability in complex clinical scenarios.
目的:评价锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和口腔内扫描(IOS)自动多模态配准的最新进展及其在口腔医学中的临床意义。方法:于2024年10月在PubMed、Web of Science和IEEE explore数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,包括过去十年发表的研究。纳入标准如下:英语研究、随机和非随机对照试验、队列研究、病例对照研究、横断面研究和回顾性研究。结果:纳入的493篇文献中,22篇符合纳入标准。其中,14项研究使用基于几何的方法,7项研究使用人工智能(AI)技术,1项研究比较了两种方法的准确性。基于几何的方法主要采用两阶段粗到精配准算法,所需的计算资源相对较少。相比之下,人工智能方法利用先进的深度学习模型,在自动化和鲁棒性方面取得了重大进步。结论:CBCT和IOS配准技术的最新进展大大提高了牙齿三维建模的效率和准确性,这些技术在正畸学、种植学和口腔外科中具有广阔的应用前景。基于几何的算法提供了可靠的性能和低计算需求,而人工智能驱动的方法在实现全自动和高精度配准方面显示出巨大的潜力。未来的研究应关注注册标志不稳定或数据集多样性有限等挑战,以确保其在复杂临床场景中的稳定性。
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.