Identifying predictive markers for survival in malignant biliary obstruction following percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2024.106772
K. Chan , G. Vigneswaran , S. Modi , C. Sew Hee , D. Maclean , B. Stedman , T. Bryant , B. Maher
{"title":"Identifying predictive markers for survival in malignant biliary obstruction following percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage","authors":"K. Chan ,&nbsp;G. Vigneswaran ,&nbsp;S. Modi ,&nbsp;C. Sew Hee ,&nbsp;D. Maclean ,&nbsp;B. Stedman ,&nbsp;T. Bryant ,&nbsp;B. Maher","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.106772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Malignant biliary obstructive disease is commonly managed with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Traditionally, outcomes are evaluated collectively despite substantial variability in the underlying aetiology and extent of disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether variability in survival could be explained by different underlying patient and disease factors.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A single centre, retrospective study was performed looking at first-time malignant PTBD and respective survival outcomes between 2017- 2021. Survival censoring was taken as June 2022. Predictors included aetiology, age, preprocedural serum haemoglobin, and bilirubin. Subgroups were dichotomised with respect to median values. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and the log rank test were used for univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression for multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred fifty-six patients were identified, including 62 pancreatic, 19 ampullary/duodenal, 55 hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and 20 non hepatobiliary cancers. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 136 days. The underlying aetiology significantly impacted median survival with non-hepatobiliary obstruction faring the worst; 53 days, and was in stark contrast to cholangiocarcinoma (347 days, p &lt; 0.001). On multivariate analysis, we found that in addition to aetiology, patients &gt; 70 years, preprocedural haemoglobin (&lt; 110) and bilirubin (&gt; 232) were all independent prognosticators and had significantly worse survival (HR 1.2, 1.8, 1.6, and 1.4, respectively, all p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Age, underlying malignant aetiology, preprocedural haemoglobin, and bilirubin were identified as independent predictors of post-PTBD survival. Careful patient selection may therefore improve patient outcomes following PTBD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 106772"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926024006597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Malignant biliary obstructive disease is commonly managed with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Traditionally, outcomes are evaluated collectively despite substantial variability in the underlying aetiology and extent of disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether variability in survival could be explained by different underlying patient and disease factors.

Materials and methods

A single centre, retrospective study was performed looking at first-time malignant PTBD and respective survival outcomes between 2017- 2021. Survival censoring was taken as June 2022. Predictors included aetiology, age, preprocedural serum haemoglobin, and bilirubin. Subgroups were dichotomised with respect to median values. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and the log rank test were used for univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression for multivariate analysis.

Results

One hundred fifty-six patients were identified, including 62 pancreatic, 19 ampullary/duodenal, 55 hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and 20 non hepatobiliary cancers. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 136 days. The underlying aetiology significantly impacted median survival with non-hepatobiliary obstruction faring the worst; 53 days, and was in stark contrast to cholangiocarcinoma (347 days, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, we found that in addition to aetiology, patients > 70 years, preprocedural haemoglobin (< 110) and bilirubin (> 232) were all independent prognosticators and had significantly worse survival (HR 1.2, 1.8, 1.6, and 1.4, respectively, all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Age, underlying malignant aetiology, preprocedural haemoglobin, and bilirubin were identified as independent predictors of post-PTBD survival. Careful patient selection may therefore improve patient outcomes following PTBD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定经皮肝胆道引流术后恶性胆道梗阻患者生存的预测指标。
目的:恶性胆道梗阻性疾病通常采用经皮经肝胆道引流(PTBD)治疗。传统上,尽管潜在的病因和疾病程度存在很大差异,但对结果进行集体评估。本研究的目的是探讨生存率的变异性是否可以由不同的潜在患者和疾病因素来解释。材料和方法:在2017- 2021年期间进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,研究首次恶性PTBD和各自的生存结果。生存审查为2022年6月。预测因素包括病因、年龄、术前血清血红蛋白和胆红素。亚组相对于中位数进行二分类。单因素分析采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和log rank检验,多因素分析采用Cox比例风险回归。结果:共发现156例患者,其中胰腺癌62例,壶腹/十二指肠癌19例,肝门胆管癌55例,非肝胆癌20例。整个队列的中位总生存期为136天。潜在的病因显著影响中位生存期,其中非肝胆梗阻最差;53天,与胆管癌(347天,p < 0.001)形成鲜明对比。在多因素分析中,我们发现除了病因外,患者bbb70岁、术前血红蛋白(< 110)和胆红素(bbb232)都是独立的预后因素,生存率明显较差(HR分别为1.2、1.8、1.6和1.4,均p < 0.05)。结论:年龄、潜在的恶性病因、手术前血红蛋白和胆红素被确定为ptbd后生存的独立预测因素。因此,谨慎的患者选择可能会改善PTBD患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
期刊最新文献
Pericoronary fat attenuation index is a potential indicator for the prognosis of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Computed tomography features of polysplenia syndrome in adulthood: a case series Prompt engineering enables open-source large language models to match proprietary models in diagnostic accuracy for annotation of radiology reports Diagnostic accuracy of proton density versus proton density fat-saturated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences in meniscal tear evaluation: a multireader ROC analysis Clinicians' preferences for radiology reports in a tertiary hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1