The role of rodent behavioral models of schizophrenia in the ongoing search for novel antipsychotics.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1080/17460441.2025.2459807
Hugo Cano-Ramírez, Kurt Leroy Hoffman
{"title":"The role of rodent behavioral models of schizophrenia in the ongoing search for novel antipsychotics.","authors":"Hugo Cano-Ramírez, Kurt Leroy Hoffman","doi":"10.1080/17460441.2025.2459807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Existing pharmacotherapies for schizophrenia have not progressed beyond targeting dopamine and serotonin neurotransmission. Rodent models of schizophrenia are a necessary tool for elucidating neuropathological processes and testing potential pharmacotherapies, but positive preclinical results in rodent models often do not translate to positive results in the clinic.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The authors reviewed PubMed for studies that applied rodent behavioral models of schizophrenia to assess the antipsychotic potential of several novel pharmacotherapies currently under investigation. These included acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor agonists and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs), histamine H3 receptor antagonist/inverse, calcium channel modulators, trace amino acid receptor (TAAR) agonists, and phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A) inhibitors. The authors discuss the extent to which the results of preclinical studies of these drugs in rodent models have predicted clinical efficacy.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Although published preclinical studies of these drugs were largely positive, clinical results were often modest or negative. This lack of correspondence is likely due to many factors, including differences in experimental design, poor translation of effective dosing from preclinical to clinical studies, and large inter-individual variation of the human population as compared to laboratory rodents. Closing the gap between preclinical and clinical studies will require strategies aimed at reducing the impact of these factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12267,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2025.2459807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Existing pharmacotherapies for schizophrenia have not progressed beyond targeting dopamine and serotonin neurotransmission. Rodent models of schizophrenia are a necessary tool for elucidating neuropathological processes and testing potential pharmacotherapies, but positive preclinical results in rodent models often do not translate to positive results in the clinic.

Areas covered: The authors reviewed PubMed for studies that applied rodent behavioral models of schizophrenia to assess the antipsychotic potential of several novel pharmacotherapies currently under investigation. These included acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor agonists and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs), histamine H3 receptor antagonist/inverse, calcium channel modulators, trace amino acid receptor (TAAR) agonists, and phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A) inhibitors. The authors discuss the extent to which the results of preclinical studies of these drugs in rodent models have predicted clinical efficacy.

Expert opinion: Although published preclinical studies of these drugs were largely positive, clinical results were often modest or negative. This lack of correspondence is likely due to many factors, including differences in experimental design, poor translation of effective dosing from preclinical to clinical studies, and large inter-individual variation of the human population as compared to laboratory rodents. Closing the gap between preclinical and clinical studies will require strategies aimed at reducing the impact of these factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (ISSN 1746-0441 [print], 1746-045X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on novel technologies involved in the drug discovery process, leading to new leads and reduced attrition rates. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering chemoinformatics; bioinformatics; assay development; novel screening technologies; in vitro/in vivo models; structure-based drug design; systems biology Drug Case Histories examining the steps involved in the preclinical and clinical development of a particular drug The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industry, academic pharmaceutical scientists and other closely related professionals looking to enhance the success of their drug candidates through optimisation at the preclinical level.
期刊最新文献
The importance of preclinical models for cholangiocarcinoma drug discovery. Animal models of Kabuki syndrome and their applicability to novel drug discovery. Investigating novel pharmacological strategies for treatment-resistant depression: focus on new mechanisms and approaches. The role of rodent behavioral models of schizophrenia in the ongoing search for novel antipsychotics. Virtual screening: hope, hype, and the fine line in between.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1