Left atrial remodelling and function in various left ventricular hypertrophic phenotypes.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-04-30 DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeaf033
Martina De Raffele, Albert Teis, German Cediel, Jerremy Weerts, Cristina Conte, Gladys Juncà, Gizem Kasa, Elena Ferrer-Sistach, Matteo Bertini, Antoni Bayes-Genis, Victoria Delgado
{"title":"Left atrial remodelling and function in various left ventricular hypertrophic phenotypes.","authors":"Martina De Raffele, Albert Teis, German Cediel, Jerremy Weerts, Cristina Conte, Gladys Juncà, Gizem Kasa, Elena Ferrer-Sistach, Matteo Bertini, Antoni Bayes-Genis, Victoria Delgado","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeaf033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>How the underlying aetiology and pathophysiology of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy affects left atrial (LA) remodelling and function remains unexplored. The present study aims to investigate the influence of various hypertrophic phenotypes on LA remodelling and function.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients with LV hypertrophy who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) were compared to a control group. CMR data were analysed retrospectively to assess LA strain, volume, sphericity, and left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI). Independent clinical associates of LA strain were assessed using multivariable linear regression analysis. A total of 375 individuals were included: 148 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), 35 with cardiac amyloidosis (CA), 41 with hypertensive (HTN) heart disease, 97 with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), and 54 with normal CMR. Indexed LA end-systolic (iLVmax), diastolic volumes, and LA sphericity were the largest in patients with CA (59.1 ± 16.9 mL/m2, 46.8 ± 16.4 mL/m2, and 83.2 ± 2.1%, respectively). Patients with CA presented a higher LACI when compared with other groups (58 ± 2% vs. 42 ± 2% in HCM, 39 ± 2% in HTN heart disease, 37 ± 2% in AS, and 22 ± 1% in normal), while no differences were observed across others. Patients with CA showed the lowest LA reservoir [9.6% (0.6-18.6%)] and booster strain (9.1 ± 5.4%), whereas no differences were observed across other groups. LACI and iLAVmax were independently correlated with LA reservoir (β = 0.15 and β = -39.33, respectively), LA conduit (β = 0.08 and β = -17.08, respectively), and LA booster strains (β = 0.1 and β = -28.69, respectively). LA sphericity was independently correlated with LA reservoir strain (β = -0.51). Finally, LV global longitudinal strain was independently correlated with LA reservoir (β = -0.43), conduit (β = -0.20), and booster strain (β = -0.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LA characteristics differ among LV hypertrophic phenotypes. LACI and iLAVmax are independently correlated with LA function, while LA sphericity correlates independently with LA reservoir strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"853-862"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: How the underlying aetiology and pathophysiology of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy affects left atrial (LA) remodelling and function remains unexplored. The present study aims to investigate the influence of various hypertrophic phenotypes on LA remodelling and function.

Methods and results: Patients with LV hypertrophy who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) were compared to a control group. CMR data were analysed retrospectively to assess LA strain, volume, sphericity, and left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI). Independent clinical associates of LA strain were assessed using multivariable linear regression analysis. A total of 375 individuals were included: 148 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), 35 with cardiac amyloidosis (CA), 41 with hypertensive (HTN) heart disease, 97 with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), and 54 with normal CMR. Indexed LA end-systolic (iLVmax), diastolic volumes, and LA sphericity were the largest in patients with CA (59.1 ± 16.9 mL/m2, 46.8 ± 16.4 mL/m2, and 83.2 ± 2.1%, respectively). Patients with CA presented a higher LACI when compared with other groups (58 ± 2% vs. 42 ± 2% in HCM, 39 ± 2% in HTN heart disease, 37 ± 2% in AS, and 22 ± 1% in normal), while no differences were observed across others. Patients with CA showed the lowest LA reservoir [9.6% (0.6-18.6%)] and booster strain (9.1 ± 5.4%), whereas no differences were observed across other groups. LACI and iLAVmax were independently correlated with LA reservoir (β = 0.15 and β = -39.33, respectively), LA conduit (β = 0.08 and β = -17.08, respectively), and LA booster strains (β = 0.1 and β = -28.69, respectively). LA sphericity was independently correlated with LA reservoir strain (β = -0.51). Finally, LV global longitudinal strain was independently correlated with LA reservoir (β = -0.43), conduit (β = -0.20), and booster strain (β = -0.24).

Conclusion: LA characteristics differ among LV hypertrophic phenotypes. LACI and iLAVmax are independently correlated with LA function, while LA sphericity correlates independently with LA reservoir strain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各种左心室肥厚表型左心房重构和功能。
目的:左室(LV)肥厚的潜在病因和病理生理如何影响左室重塑和功能尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨各种肥厚表型对LA重塑和功能的影响。方法与结果:将左室肥厚患者行心脏磁共振(CMR)检查与对照组进行比较。回顾性分析CMR数据,评估左室应变、体积、球度和左房室耦合指数(LACI)。采用多变量线性回归分析评估LA菌株的独立临床关联。共纳入375例:肥厚性心肌病(HCM) 148例,心脏淀粉样变性(CA) 35例,高血压性心脏病(HTN) 41例,严重无症状主动脉瓣狭窄(AS) 97例,CMR正常54例。CA患者的LA收缩末期(iLVmax)、舒张容积和LA球形度最大(分别为59.1±16.9ml/m2、46.8±16.4ml/m2和83.2±2.1%)。与其他组相比,CA患者的LACI更高(HCM组为58±2%,HCM组为42±2%,HTN组为39±2%,AS组为37±2%,正常组为22±1%),而其他组之间无差异。CA患者的LA库值最低(9.6%[0.6-18.6%]),增强菌株最低(9.1±5.4%),其他组间无差异。LACI和iLAVmax分别与LA储层菌株(β=0.15和β=-39.33)、LA导管菌株(β=0.08和β= -17.08)和LA增强菌株(β=0.1和β=-28.69)独立相关。LA球度与LA库菌株独立相关(β=-0.51)。最后,LV整体纵向应变与LA储层(β=-0.43)、导管(β=-0.20)和增压应变(β=-0.24)独立相关。结论:左室肥厚表型的LA特征不同。lai和iLAVmax与LA函数独立相关,LA球度与LA库应变独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
708
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.
期刊最新文献
MRI-derived Wall Thickness Heterogeneity in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and in Carriers of Sarcomeric Gene Mutations. Funnel-Type Patent Foramen Ovale Morphology on 3D Echocardiography: A Novel High-Risk Anatomic Feature. Diagnostic Yield of Second-Line Functional Imaging After an Abnormal Coronary CTA: An Individual Patient-Data Meta-analysis. Smoking Cessation after first STEMI enhances Infarct Healing: a Cardiac MRI Study. Associations and prognostic implications of myocardial tissue injury stages in ST-elevation myocardial infarction using the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1