Performance of molecular classification in predicting oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100016
Filippo Alberto Ferrari, Stefano Uccella, Massimo Franchi, Giovanni Scambia, Francesco Fanfani, Anna Fagotti, Matteo Pavone, Francesco Raspagliesi, Giorgio Bogani
{"title":"Performance of molecular classification in predicting oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer.","authors":"Filippo Alberto Ferrari, Stefano Uccella, Massimo Franchi, Giovanni Scambia, Francesco Fanfani, Anna Fagotti, Matteo Pavone, Francesco Raspagliesi, Giorgio Bogani","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endometrial cancers can be classified into 4 molecular sub-groups: (1) POLE mutated (POLEmut), (2) mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite-instable (MMRd/MSI-H), (3) TP53-mutant or p53 abnormal (p53abn), and (4) no specific mutational profile (NSMP). Although molecular classification is increasingly applied in oncology, its role in guiding fertility-sparing treatments for endometrial cancer remains unclear. This study examines the prognostic role of molecular classification in fertility-sparing treatment and its potential to guide treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies applying molecular classifiers in patients with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia who underwent fertility-sparing treatment (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, identification CRD42024555559). A literature search was performed across Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library (2013-February 2024). Studies included full-text English articles with pre-operative assessments (histology, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasound) and molecular classification through next-generation sequencing or Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies were considered. Outcomes included complete response, partial response, stable disease, progression, and recurrence, with pooled analyses performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight retrospective cohort studies comprising 363 patients met the inclusion criteria. Next-generation sequencing was used in 5 studies. The distribution of molecular sub-groups was POLEmut (5.8%), p53abn (3.3%), MMRd/MSI-H (12.1%), and NSMP (78.8%). Complete response and recurrence rates were POLEmut (66.6% and 14.3%), p53abn (50% and 33%), MMRd/MSI-H (48.8% and 42.8%), and NSMP (78.4% and 18.4%). Significant differences in complete response (p <.001) and recurrence rates (p = .005) were found across sub-groups. Pairwise analysis revealed lower complete response and higher recurrence rates for MMRd/MSI-H (p <.001, p = .01) and lower response for p53abn (p = .03) than for NSMP. POLEmut did not show superior success to other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Molecular classification indicates prognostic value in fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer. NSMP had the highest response rates, whereas MMRd/MSI-H and p53abn were associated with poorer outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 1","pages":"100016"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Endometrial cancers can be classified into 4 molecular sub-groups: (1) POLE mutated (POLEmut), (2) mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite-instable (MMRd/MSI-H), (3) TP53-mutant or p53 abnormal (p53abn), and (4) no specific mutational profile (NSMP). Although molecular classification is increasingly applied in oncology, its role in guiding fertility-sparing treatments for endometrial cancer remains unclear. This study examines the prognostic role of molecular classification in fertility-sparing treatment and its potential to guide treatment decisions.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies applying molecular classifiers in patients with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia who underwent fertility-sparing treatment (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, identification CRD42024555559). A literature search was performed across Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library (2013-February 2024). Studies included full-text English articles with pre-operative assessments (histology, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasound) and molecular classification through next-generation sequencing or Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies were considered. Outcomes included complete response, partial response, stable disease, progression, and recurrence, with pooled analyses performed.

Results: Eight retrospective cohort studies comprising 363 patients met the inclusion criteria. Next-generation sequencing was used in 5 studies. The distribution of molecular sub-groups was POLEmut (5.8%), p53abn (3.3%), MMRd/MSI-H (12.1%), and NSMP (78.8%). Complete response and recurrence rates were POLEmut (66.6% and 14.3%), p53abn (50% and 33%), MMRd/MSI-H (48.8% and 42.8%), and NSMP (78.4% and 18.4%). Significant differences in complete response (p <.001) and recurrence rates (p = .005) were found across sub-groups. Pairwise analysis revealed lower complete response and higher recurrence rates for MMRd/MSI-H (p <.001, p = .01) and lower response for p53abn (p = .03) than for NSMP. POLEmut did not show superior success to other groups.

Conclusion: Molecular classification indicates prognostic value in fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer. NSMP had the highest response rates, whereas MMRd/MSI-H and p53abn were associated with poorer outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
High-grade serous ovarian cancer-bridging the gap between epidemiology and prevention with biology. Circulating tumor DNA in endometrial cancer: clinical significance and implications. Estimating high-grade serous fallopian tubal carcinoma in the era of tubal hypothesis. Survival after interval and delayed cytoreduction surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: a Global Gynaecological Oncology Surgical Outcomes Collaborative-Led Study (GO SOAR2). Prognosis of stage I ovarian mucinous tumors according to expansile and infiltrative types.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1