Cervical Cancer Screening in Women With Physical Disabilities.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57290
Alexandra H Vinson, Corrianne Norrid, Elizabeth K Haro, Susan Ernst, Christelle El Khoury, Martha L Alves, Autumn Kieber-Emmons, Ashwini Kamath Mulki, Emma A Butcher, Claire Kalpakjian, Michael M McKee, Diane M Harper
{"title":"Cervical Cancer Screening in Women With Physical Disabilities.","authors":"Alexandra H Vinson, Corrianne Norrid, Elizabeth K Haro, Susan Ernst, Christelle El Khoury, Martha L Alves, Autumn Kieber-Emmons, Ashwini Kamath Mulki, Emma A Butcher, Claire Kalpakjian, Michael M McKee, Diane M Harper","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cervical cancer screening is a crucial public health intervention, but screening disparities exist for women with physical disabilities (WWPD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the experiences of WWPD with both traditional speculum examination-based screening and at-home self-sampling for cervical cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This qualitative study enrolled 56 WWPD to test self-sampling kits, provide feedback via a survey, and participate in a qualitative interview. An interprofessional team conducted semistructured interviews with 16 key informants and 40 pilot participants for 56 WWPD from November 1, 2021, through April 30, 2023. All completed a self-administered quantitative survey. Key informants' experiences with 4 self-sampling devices helped determine which 2 self-sampling kits would be offered to participants in a pilot study.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>A coding scheme was developed to represent inductive codes generated through preliminary coding and deductive codes representing domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework. This coding scheme was used to conduct a 2-pass thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 56 WWPD (mean [SD] age, 45.4 [9.1] years) who participated in the study, 28 (50.0%) were up to date with cervical cancer screening. Participants described accessibility barriers and clinician ableism that made speculum-based in-office examinations difficult, leading some participants to delay or avoid screening. In contrast, participants described self-screening as more comfortable and convenient, regardless of whether they prefer future speculum-based screening. Their responses also allowed for the exploration of how screening preferences may impact future screening behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Interviews with WWPD suggested that access to self-sampling screening options would be more comfortable for cervical cancer screening participation. Understanding participants' experiences with self-sampling devices generates insights into improving screening experiences for WWPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2457290"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57290","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Cervical cancer screening is a crucial public health intervention, but screening disparities exist for women with physical disabilities (WWPD).

Objective: To explore the experiences of WWPD with both traditional speculum examination-based screening and at-home self-sampling for cervical cancer screening.

Design, setting, and participants: This qualitative study enrolled 56 WWPD to test self-sampling kits, provide feedback via a survey, and participate in a qualitative interview. An interprofessional team conducted semistructured interviews with 16 key informants and 40 pilot participants for 56 WWPD from November 1, 2021, through April 30, 2023. All completed a self-administered quantitative survey. Key informants' experiences with 4 self-sampling devices helped determine which 2 self-sampling kits would be offered to participants in a pilot study.

Main outcomes and measures: A coding scheme was developed to represent inductive codes generated through preliminary coding and deductive codes representing domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework. This coding scheme was used to conduct a 2-pass thematic analysis.

Results: Of the 56 WWPD (mean [SD] age, 45.4 [9.1] years) who participated in the study, 28 (50.0%) were up to date with cervical cancer screening. Participants described accessibility barriers and clinician ableism that made speculum-based in-office examinations difficult, leading some participants to delay or avoid screening. In contrast, participants described self-screening as more comfortable and convenient, regardless of whether they prefer future speculum-based screening. Their responses also allowed for the exploration of how screening preferences may impact future screening behavior.

Conclusions and relevance: Interviews with WWPD suggested that access to self-sampling screening options would be more comfortable for cervical cancer screening participation. Understanding participants' experiences with self-sampling devices generates insights into improving screening experiences for WWPD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身体残疾妇女的子宫颈癌普查。
重要性:宫颈癌筛查是一项重要的公共卫生干预措施,但对身体残疾妇女(WWPD)的筛查存在差异。目的:探讨传统的宫颈镜检查筛查和家庭自取样在WWPD宫颈癌筛查中的应用经验。设计、设置和参与者:本定性研究招募了56名WWPD来测试自采样工具包,通过调查提供反馈,并参与定性访谈。从2021年11月1日至2023年4月30日,一个跨专业团队对56个WWPD的16名关键线人和40名试点参与者进行了半结构化访谈。所有人都完成了一项自我管理的定量调查。关键举报人使用4种自采样设备的经验有助于确定向试点研究的参与者提供哪两种自采样工具包。主要成果和措施:开发了一种编码方案来表示通过初步编码产生的归纳代码和表示理论领域框架中的领域的演绎代码。采用该编码方案进行两段式主题分析。结果:参与研究的56例WWPD(平均[SD]年龄45.4[9.1]岁)中,28例(50.0%)进行了宫颈癌筛查。参与者描述了无障碍障碍和临床医生的残疾,使基于镜的办公室检查变得困难,导致一些参与者延迟或避免筛查。相比之下,参与者认为自我筛查更舒适、更方便,而不管他们是否喜欢未来基于窥镜的筛查。他们的回答也允许探索筛选偏好如何影响未来的筛选行为。结论和相关性:与WWPD的访谈表明,获得自抽样筛查选项将更有利于宫颈癌筛查的参与。了解参与者使用自采样设备的经验,可以为改善WWPD的筛查体验提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
Match Rates Between Home Health Assessment and Medicare Claims Data. Unionization, Ownership Status, and Direct Care Worker Turnover. Wording Change in Introduction. Police Pursuit Fatalities in the US, 2009 to 2023. Police Pursuit Fatality Rates in the US and Directions for Future Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1