Glycemic control to improve post-operative outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results of the SUGAR (Surgical Universal euGlycemic Attainment during Recovery) initiative.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100003
Jolyn S Taylor, Bryan Fellman, Katherine E Cain, Maria D Iniesta, Terri Earles, Melinda Harris, Deepthi James, Christine Siebel, Javier Lasala, Gabriel Mena, Sally Raty, Shannon Popovich, Khanh Vu, Sonali Thosani, Conor Best, Kathleen M Schmeler, Pedro T Ramirez, Larissa A Meyer
{"title":"Glycemic control to improve post-operative outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results of the SUGAR (Surgical Universal euGlycemic Attainment during Recovery) initiative.","authors":"Jolyn S Taylor, Bryan Fellman, Katherine E Cain, Maria D Iniesta, Terri Earles, Melinda Harris, Deepthi James, Christine Siebel, Javier Lasala, Gabriel Mena, Sally Raty, Shannon Popovich, Khanh Vu, Sonali Thosani, Conor Best, Kathleen M Schmeler, Pedro T Ramirez, Larissa A Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hyperglycemia, or glucose values >180 mg/dL, is associated with adverse post-operative outcomes. Our objective was to determine the impact of improving peri-operative glycemic control and evaluate infectious complications among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing open gynecologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary team standardized pre-operative screening, referral algorithms, and intra-operative and post-operative hyperglycemia management (Surgical Universal euGlycemic Attainment during Recovery initiative). We compared outcomes between a baseline cohort (March 2016-December 2017) and an intervention cohort (February 2018-August 2022). Patients with type 1 diabetes, and planned minimally invasive, multi-team, or emergency surgery were excluded. Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared using the χ<sup>2</sup> test, Fisher exact test, t test, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and generalized linear mixed models were used with a logit link function. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata/MP v17.0 (College Station, StataCorp).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed 103 baseline patients and 167 intervention patients with diabetes. In the baseline cohort, 26 patients (25%) had hemoglobin A1C screened prior to surgery compared with 158 (95%) in the intervention cohort (p < .001). All surgical patients were screened for diabetes to determine eligibility, and we tracked the rate of patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (18 patients or 11%). The percentages of glucose values ≤180 mg/dL pre-operatively or intra-operatively were similar between cohorts, but the intervention cohort had increased compliance with assessing glucose intra-operatively (84% compared with 55%, p < .001). The percentage of post-operative glucose values ≤180 mg/dL increased from 77% in the baseline cohort to 86% in the intervention cohort (p = .002). The average post-operative glucose value was 10 mg/dL lower in the intervention cohort than in the baseline cohort (p = .005). Rates of surgical site infection, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection were similar between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our initiative improved compliance with pre-operative glycemic screening and decreased hyperglycemia among diabetic patients. We did not identify the correlation between glycemic control and infectious complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 1","pages":"100003"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Hyperglycemia, or glucose values >180 mg/dL, is associated with adverse post-operative outcomes. Our objective was to determine the impact of improving peri-operative glycemic control and evaluate infectious complications among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing open gynecologic surgery.

Methods: A multidisciplinary team standardized pre-operative screening, referral algorithms, and intra-operative and post-operative hyperglycemia management (Surgical Universal euGlycemic Attainment during Recovery initiative). We compared outcomes between a baseline cohort (March 2016-December 2017) and an intervention cohort (February 2018-August 2022). Patients with type 1 diabetes, and planned minimally invasive, multi-team, or emergency surgery were excluded. Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared using the χ2 test, Fisher exact test, t test, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and generalized linear mixed models were used with a logit link function. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata/MP v17.0 (College Station, StataCorp).

Results: We assessed 103 baseline patients and 167 intervention patients with diabetes. In the baseline cohort, 26 patients (25%) had hemoglobin A1C screened prior to surgery compared with 158 (95%) in the intervention cohort (p < .001). All surgical patients were screened for diabetes to determine eligibility, and we tracked the rate of patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (18 patients or 11%). The percentages of glucose values ≤180 mg/dL pre-operatively or intra-operatively were similar between cohorts, but the intervention cohort had increased compliance with assessing glucose intra-operatively (84% compared with 55%, p < .001). The percentage of post-operative glucose values ≤180 mg/dL increased from 77% in the baseline cohort to 86% in the intervention cohort (p = .002). The average post-operative glucose value was 10 mg/dL lower in the intervention cohort than in the baseline cohort (p = .005). Rates of surgical site infection, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection were similar between cohorts.

Conclusion: Our initiative improved compliance with pre-operative glycemic screening and decreased hyperglycemia among diabetic patients. We did not identify the correlation between glycemic control and infectious complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy intra-operative evaluation in ovarian cancer: definition of in vivo architectural patterns to determine resection strategies. Wunderlich syndrome as a presenting symptom in cervical cancer. High-grade serous ovarian cancer-bridging the gap between epidemiology and prevention with biology. Circulating tumor DNA in endometrial cancer: clinical significance and implications. Estimating high-grade serous fallopian tubal carcinoma in the era of tubal hypothesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1