Maitri Munsif, Matthew Donnan, Gregory Snell, Kovi Levin, Miranda Paraskeva
{"title":"Return-to-work in lung transplant recipients: an Australian perspective.","authors":"Maitri Munsif, Matthew Donnan, Gregory Snell, Kovi Levin, Miranda Paraskeva","doi":"10.1111/imj.16641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Return-to-work (RTW) following lung transplant has been associated with increased quality of life, but little is known regarding the rates of and barriers to this in the Australian population.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to describe, characterise and determine predictors of return to work and social participation in Australian lung transplant recipients. We also sought to explore the relationship between return to work and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne between October 2018 and August 2019. The questionnaire evaluated demographics, transplant history, respiratory parameters, employment history and social integration prior to and after lung transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 172 lung transplant recipients were included for analysis. The population was mostly male (56.5%), median age 61 years (interquartile range (IQR) 49.8-67.0) and median time from transplant 4 years (IQR 2-7). A total of 19.2% of patients were working at time of transplant, with 35.5% working after transplant representing an increase in workforce engagement of 84.8% (P < 0.001). A total of 96% of those who returned to work reported an improvement in quality of life. Median time to RTW after transplant was 180 days (IQR 90-360). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an increased rate of RTW in younger recipients (odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-0.99, adjusted P = 0.029), at greater length of time after transplant (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.99-1.19, P = 0.084), among those working at the time of transplant (OR 9.55, 95% CI 2.70-33.75, P < 0.001) and with higher socioeconomic status (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = 0.009). Recipients with cystic fibrosis were more likely to RTW (65.8%) than those with other underlying conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RTW should be encouraged in lung transplant recipients. Targeted supports and resources aimed at younger recipients may result in greater workforce engagement and overall outcomes after transplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.16641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Return-to-work (RTW) following lung transplant has been associated with increased quality of life, but little is known regarding the rates of and barriers to this in the Australian population.
Aims: We aimed to describe, characterise and determine predictors of return to work and social participation in Australian lung transplant recipients. We also sought to explore the relationship between return to work and quality of life.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne between October 2018 and August 2019. The questionnaire evaluated demographics, transplant history, respiratory parameters, employment history and social integration prior to and after lung transplantation.
Results: A total of 172 lung transplant recipients were included for analysis. The population was mostly male (56.5%), median age 61 years (interquartile range (IQR) 49.8-67.0) and median time from transplant 4 years (IQR 2-7). A total of 19.2% of patients were working at time of transplant, with 35.5% working after transplant representing an increase in workforce engagement of 84.8% (P < 0.001). A total of 96% of those who returned to work reported an improvement in quality of life. Median time to RTW after transplant was 180 days (IQR 90-360). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an increased rate of RTW in younger recipients (odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-0.99, adjusted P = 0.029), at greater length of time after transplant (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.99-1.19, P = 0.084), among those working at the time of transplant (OR 9.55, 95% CI 2.70-33.75, P < 0.001) and with higher socioeconomic status (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = 0.009). Recipients with cystic fibrosis were more likely to RTW (65.8%) than those with other underlying conditions.
Conclusions: RTW should be encouraged in lung transplant recipients. Targeted supports and resources aimed at younger recipients may result in greater workforce engagement and overall outcomes after transplant.
期刊介绍:
The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.