Computed tomography-based prediction of interval cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100011
Beatriz Yesenia Cortés García, Isabel Sollozo-Dupont, Evelyn Azaria Torres Gómez, Carlos Pérez-Plasencia, Diddier Prada, Alberto Alonso Umaña Breñes, Yolanda Villaseñor Navarro, David Cantú-De León
{"title":"Computed tomography-based prediction of interval cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer.","authors":"Beatriz Yesenia Cortés García, Isabel Sollozo-Dupont, Evelyn Azaria Torres Gómez, Carlos Pérez-Plasencia, Diddier Prada, Alberto Alonso Umaña Breñes, Yolanda Villaseñor Navarro, David Cantú-De León","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our retrospective study aimed to investigate the role of computed tomography (CT) using both the tomographic Fagotti index and the Sugarbaker peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in predicting the feasibility of optimal interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated in our institution who were eligible for interval debulking surgery were identified and included in the study. A retrospective image collection was operated, and CT scan evaluations were conducted by 2 independent radiologists to establish both scores (Fagotti index and Sugarbaker PCI). The workflow included a third radiologist who resolved discrepancies. The receiver operating characteristics curve followed by the Youden J statistic was calculated to determine cutoff points that best differentiated complete/optimal versus suboptimal cytoreduction. The Fagotti index and Sugarbaker PCI cutoffs' accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated and represented as 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 consecutive patients who had complete information in their charts with evaluable images and complete information about surgery were evaluated; of these, 35 had a complete/optimal interval debulking surgery. The receiver operating characteristic curve of the Fagotti index scoring system showed that a cutoff of ≥3 can identify 100% of inoperable patients. However, 29% of patients were falsely labeled as inoperable. A cutoff point of ≥5 avoids 88% of unnecessary laparotomies, reducing the rate of false inoperable designation from 29% to 17%. A Sugarbaker PCI of ≥8 predicts the risk of unnecessary laparotomies in 68%, with 26% falsely labeled as inoperable. The score of ≥7 is most effective in avoiding unnecessary surgeries (80%), but the chance of false positives increases from 26% to 32%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT-based scoring systems used in the present work can help determine which patients with advanced ovarian cancer are suitable for interval debulking surgery with high precision. Future studies are needed to enhance accuracy, thereby amplifying the radiologists' competency in using a systematic CT-based scoring system.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 1","pages":"100011"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our retrospective study aimed to investigate the role of computed tomography (CT) using both the tomographic Fagotti index and the Sugarbaker peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in predicting the feasibility of optimal interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods: Patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated in our institution who were eligible for interval debulking surgery were identified and included in the study. A retrospective image collection was operated, and CT scan evaluations were conducted by 2 independent radiologists to establish both scores (Fagotti index and Sugarbaker PCI). The workflow included a third radiologist who resolved discrepancies. The receiver operating characteristics curve followed by the Youden J statistic was calculated to determine cutoff points that best differentiated complete/optimal versus suboptimal cytoreduction. The Fagotti index and Sugarbaker PCI cutoffs' accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated and represented as 95% CIs.

Results: A total of 60 consecutive patients who had complete information in their charts with evaluable images and complete information about surgery were evaluated; of these, 35 had a complete/optimal interval debulking surgery. The receiver operating characteristic curve of the Fagotti index scoring system showed that a cutoff of ≥3 can identify 100% of inoperable patients. However, 29% of patients were falsely labeled as inoperable. A cutoff point of ≥5 avoids 88% of unnecessary laparotomies, reducing the rate of false inoperable designation from 29% to 17%. A Sugarbaker PCI of ≥8 predicts the risk of unnecessary laparotomies in 68%, with 26% falsely labeled as inoperable. The score of ≥7 is most effective in avoiding unnecessary surgeries (80%), but the chance of false positives increases from 26% to 32%.

Conclusion: CT-based scoring systems used in the present work can help determine which patients with advanced ovarian cancer are suitable for interval debulking surgery with high precision. Future studies are needed to enhance accuracy, thereby amplifying the radiologists' competency in using a systematic CT-based scoring system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
High-grade serous ovarian cancer-bridging the gap between epidemiology and prevention with biology. Circulating tumor DNA in endometrial cancer: clinical significance and implications. Estimating high-grade serous fallopian tubal carcinoma in the era of tubal hypothesis. Survival after interval and delayed cytoreduction surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: a Global Gynaecological Oncology Surgical Outcomes Collaborative-Led Study (GO SOAR2). Prognosis of stage I ovarian mucinous tumors according to expansile and infiltrative types.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1