Computed tomography-based prediction of interval cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100011
Beatriz Yesenia Cortés García, Isabel Sollozo-Dupont, Evelyn Azaria Torres Gómez, Carlos Pérez-Plasencia, Diddier Prada, Alberto Alonso Umaña Breñes, Yolanda Villaseñor Navarro, David Cantú-De León
{"title":"Computed tomography-based prediction of interval cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer.","authors":"Beatriz Yesenia Cortés García, Isabel Sollozo-Dupont, Evelyn Azaria Torres Gómez, Carlos Pérez-Plasencia, Diddier Prada, Alberto Alonso Umaña Breñes, Yolanda Villaseñor Navarro, David Cantú-De León","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our retrospective study aimed to investigate the role of computed tomography (CT) using both the tomographic Fagotti index and the Sugarbaker peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in predicting the feasibility of optimal interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated in our institution who were eligible for interval debulking surgery were identified and included in the study. A retrospective image collection was operated, and CT scan evaluations were conducted by 2 independent radiologists to establish both scores (Fagotti index and Sugarbaker PCI). The workflow included a third radiologist who resolved discrepancies. The receiver operating characteristics curve followed by the Youden J statistic was calculated to determine cutoff points that best differentiated complete/optimal versus suboptimal cytoreduction. The Fagotti index and Sugarbaker PCI cutoffs' accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated and represented as 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 consecutive patients who had complete information in their charts with evaluable images and complete information about surgery were evaluated; of these, 35 had a complete/optimal interval debulking surgery. The receiver operating characteristic curve of the Fagotti index scoring system showed that a cutoff of ≥3 can identify 100% of inoperable patients. However, 29% of patients were falsely labeled as inoperable. A cutoff point of ≥5 avoids 88% of unnecessary laparotomies, reducing the rate of false inoperable designation from 29% to 17%. A Sugarbaker PCI of ≥8 predicts the risk of unnecessary laparotomies in 68%, with 26% falsely labeled as inoperable. The score of ≥7 is most effective in avoiding unnecessary surgeries (80%), but the chance of false positives increases from 26% to 32%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT-based scoring systems used in the present work can help determine which patients with advanced ovarian cancer are suitable for interval debulking surgery with high precision. Future studies are needed to enhance accuracy, thereby amplifying the radiologists' competency in using a systematic CT-based scoring system.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 1","pages":"100011"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our retrospective study aimed to investigate the role of computed tomography (CT) using both the tomographic Fagotti index and the Sugarbaker peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in predicting the feasibility of optimal interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods: Patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated in our institution who were eligible for interval debulking surgery were identified and included in the study. A retrospective image collection was operated, and CT scan evaluations were conducted by 2 independent radiologists to establish both scores (Fagotti index and Sugarbaker PCI). The workflow included a third radiologist who resolved discrepancies. The receiver operating characteristics curve followed by the Youden J statistic was calculated to determine cutoff points that best differentiated complete/optimal versus suboptimal cytoreduction. The Fagotti index and Sugarbaker PCI cutoffs' accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated and represented as 95% CIs.

Results: A total of 60 consecutive patients who had complete information in their charts with evaluable images and complete information about surgery were evaluated; of these, 35 had a complete/optimal interval debulking surgery. The receiver operating characteristic curve of the Fagotti index scoring system showed that a cutoff of ≥3 can identify 100% of inoperable patients. However, 29% of patients were falsely labeled as inoperable. A cutoff point of ≥5 avoids 88% of unnecessary laparotomies, reducing the rate of false inoperable designation from 29% to 17%. A Sugarbaker PCI of ≥8 predicts the risk of unnecessary laparotomies in 68%, with 26% falsely labeled as inoperable. The score of ≥7 is most effective in avoiding unnecessary surgeries (80%), but the chance of false positives increases from 26% to 32%.

Conclusion: CT-based scoring systems used in the present work can help determine which patients with advanced ovarian cancer are suitable for interval debulking surgery with high precision. Future studies are needed to enhance accuracy, thereby amplifying the radiologists' competency in using a systematic CT-based scoring system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于计算机断层扫描预测晚期卵巢癌间期细胞减少。
目的:我们的回顾性研究旨在探讨计算机断层扫描(CT)使用断层法戈蒂指数和Sugarbaker腹膜癌指数(PCI)预测上皮性卵巢癌最佳间隔减体积手术可行性的作用。方法:选取在我院接受间歇减容手术治疗的晚期卵巢癌患者并纳入研究。回顾性收集图像,由2名独立放射科医生进行CT扫描评估,以建立两个评分(Fagotti指数和Sugarbaker PCI)。该工作流程包括第三位放射科医生,他负责解决差异。计算受者工作特征曲线,然后计算Youden J统计量,以确定最佳区分完全/最佳与次最佳细胞减少的截止点。计算Fagotti指数和Sugarbaker PCI截断值的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,并以95% ci表示。结果:共对60例病历资料完整、图像可评价、手术信息完整的患者进行了评价;其中,35人进行了完整/最佳间隔减容手术。Fagotti指数评分系统的受试者工作特征曲线显示,截止值≥3可以100%识别出不能手术的患者。然而,29%的患者被错误地标记为不能手术。≥5的截断点避免了88%的不必要的剖腹手术,将错误的不能手术命名率从29%降低到17%。≥8的Sugarbaker PCI预测68%的患者有不必要的剖腹手术风险,26%的患者被错误地标记为不能手术。评分≥7分对避免不必要的手术最有效(80%),但假阳性的几率从26%增加到32%。结论:本文采用的基于ct的评分系统可以帮助判断晚期卵巢癌患者是否适合进行间歇减容手术,准确率较高。未来的研究需要提高准确性,从而扩大放射科医生使用基于ct的系统评分系统的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Intermediate-risk endometrial carcinoma: is the evidence ripe for this strength of recommendation?' [International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Volume 35 Issue 11 (2025) 102132]. Response to Correspondence of Hu & Wang on "Increased hospital case volume is associated with improved survival and quality of care for uterine corpus cancer in Belgium" by Vanbraband et al. Reply to the correspondence by Yang et al on "Evaluation of decision regret and reproductive concerns following fertility-sparing treatment in adolescents and young adults with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrioid endometrial cancer - a single-center cross-sectional study". Correspondence on "Elenagen, a p62/SQSTM1-encoding plasmid, improves overall survival in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a phase II trial" by Krasny et al. Let's use an equity framework to improve research, its design, implementation, and community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1