3D Segmentation of Whole Lung and Metastatic Lung Nodules Using Adaptive Region Growing and Shape-based Morphology.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1097/RCT.0000000000001719
Esha Baidya Kayal, Shuvadeep Ganguly, Archana Sasi, D S Dheeksha, Manish Saini, Swetambri Sharma, Shivansh Gupta, Nikhil Sharma, Krithika Rangarajan, Sameer Bakhshi, Devasenathipathy Kandasamy, Amit Mehndiratta
{"title":"3D Segmentation of Whole Lung and Metastatic Lung Nodules Using Adaptive Region Growing and Shape-based Morphology.","authors":"Esha Baidya Kayal, Shuvadeep Ganguly, Archana Sasi, D S Dheeksha, Manish Saini, Swetambri Sharma, Shivansh Gupta, Nikhil Sharma, Krithika Rangarajan, Sameer Bakhshi, Devasenathipathy Kandasamy, Amit Mehndiratta","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Early diagnosis of primary and metastatic lung nodules is critical for effective therapeutic planning. Manual delineation of lung nodules is not time-efficient and is prone to human error as well as interobserver and intraobserver variability. This study aimed to address the unmet need for an open-source computer-aided detection (CAD) system for 3D segmentation of lung and metastatic lung nodules along with radiomic feature extraction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed adaptive region-growing-based lung nodule segmentation (RGLNS) tool was developed in-house, requiring only manual input to select a seed point within the nodule on computed tomography (CT) images. A total of 230 CT scans from 100 patients with sarcomas were screened. Lung nodules were present in 200 CT scans, which were further analyzed. The accuracy of the lung and nodule segmentation was evaluated qualitatively using a 5-point Likert scale (uninterpretable: 1; poor: 2; fair: 3; good: 4; excellent: 5) and quantitatively using the Dice coefficient and Jaccard index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 CT scans comprising 12,000 CT slices were analyzed, among which 786 lung nodules were identified. Quantitative lung segmentation accuracies (n=2400 slices) yielded a Dice coefficient of 0.92±0.06 and a Jaccard index of 0.85±0.05. Qualitative scores (n=9600 slices) for lung boundary correction (4.56±1.18) and inclusion of pulmonary vessels (4.75±0.72) were rated as good to excellent. Quantitative nodule segmentation (n=142 nodules) accuracies were as follows: dice coefficient=0.92±0.03, 0.88±0.04, 0.86±0.03, 0.85±0.03, 084±0.04 and Jaccard index=0.84±0.03, 0.81±0.04, 0.78±0.04, 0.78±0.02, 0.76±0.04 for solitary (n=73), juxtapleural (n=32), juxtavascular (n=28), fissure-attached (n=6), and ground-glass (n=6) nodules, respectively. Qualitative scores (n=644 nodules) for nodule-boundary were good to excellent [solitary (n=342): 4.97±0.15; juxtapleural (n=155): 4.45±0.60; juxtavascular (n=127): 4.40±0.65; fissure-attached (n=9): 4.40±0.70; ground-glass (n=11): 4.25±0.75] and for exclusion of pulmonary vessels/pleura from nodules were good [juxtapleural (n=155): 4.10±0.66; juxtavascular (n=127): 4.08±0.64; fissure-attached (n=9): 4.30±0.67].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed semiautomated CAD system, RGLNS, requiring minimal manual input, demonstrated robust, and promising segmentation results for the whole lung and various types of metastatic lung nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Early diagnosis of primary and metastatic lung nodules is critical for effective therapeutic planning. Manual delineation of lung nodules is not time-efficient and is prone to human error as well as interobserver and intraobserver variability. This study aimed to address the unmet need for an open-source computer-aided detection (CAD) system for 3D segmentation of lung and metastatic lung nodules along with radiomic feature extraction.

Methods: The proposed adaptive region-growing-based lung nodule segmentation (RGLNS) tool was developed in-house, requiring only manual input to select a seed point within the nodule on computed tomography (CT) images. A total of 230 CT scans from 100 patients with sarcomas were screened. Lung nodules were present in 200 CT scans, which were further analyzed. The accuracy of the lung and nodule segmentation was evaluated qualitatively using a 5-point Likert scale (uninterpretable: 1; poor: 2; fair: 3; good: 4; excellent: 5) and quantitatively using the Dice coefficient and Jaccard index.

Results: A total of 200 CT scans comprising 12,000 CT slices were analyzed, among which 786 lung nodules were identified. Quantitative lung segmentation accuracies (n=2400 slices) yielded a Dice coefficient of 0.92±0.06 and a Jaccard index of 0.85±0.05. Qualitative scores (n=9600 slices) for lung boundary correction (4.56±1.18) and inclusion of pulmonary vessels (4.75±0.72) were rated as good to excellent. Quantitative nodule segmentation (n=142 nodules) accuracies were as follows: dice coefficient=0.92±0.03, 0.88±0.04, 0.86±0.03, 0.85±0.03, 084±0.04 and Jaccard index=0.84±0.03, 0.81±0.04, 0.78±0.04, 0.78±0.02, 0.76±0.04 for solitary (n=73), juxtapleural (n=32), juxtavascular (n=28), fissure-attached (n=6), and ground-glass (n=6) nodules, respectively. Qualitative scores (n=644 nodules) for nodule-boundary were good to excellent [solitary (n=342): 4.97±0.15; juxtapleural (n=155): 4.45±0.60; juxtavascular (n=127): 4.40±0.65; fissure-attached (n=9): 4.40±0.70; ground-glass (n=11): 4.25±0.75] and for exclusion of pulmonary vessels/pleura from nodules were good [juxtapleural (n=155): 4.10±0.66; juxtavascular (n=127): 4.08±0.64; fissure-attached (n=9): 4.30±0.67].

Conclusions: The proposed semiautomated CAD system, RGLNS, requiring minimal manual input, demonstrated robust, and promising segmentation results for the whole lung and various types of metastatic lung nodules.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric Abdominopelvic Photon-Counting Versus Energy-Integrating Detector CT. A Prototype "Smart" 3-Dimensionally Printed Model Showcasing Interactivity: Implementing Voice Command for the Ventricular and Cisternal Systems. Assessment of a New CT Detector and Filtration Technology: Part 1 - X-ray Beam Characterization and Radiation Dosimetry. Assessment of a New CT Detector and Filtration Technology: Part 2-Image Quality in Phantoms, Cadavers, and Patients. Triangular Margin: Reliable Imaging Feature of Fibrous Dysplasia in Long Bones?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1