Ketamine Versus Midazolam as the First-Line Continuous Infusion for Status Epilepticus in Children with Cardiac Disease.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1007/s12028-025-02212-5
David E Horvat, Julia S Keenan, Sam Javadian, Yu-Ting Liu, Shruthi Voleti, Katelyn Staso, Caroline Conley, Sarah D Schlatterer, Arnold J Sansevere, Dana B Harrar
{"title":"Ketamine Versus Midazolam as the First-Line Continuous Infusion for Status Epilepticus in Children with Cardiac Disease.","authors":"David E Horvat, Julia S Keenan, Sam Javadian, Yu-Ting Liu, Shruthi Voleti, Katelyn Staso, Caroline Conley, Sarah D Schlatterer, Arnold J Sansevere, Dana B Harrar","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02212-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of status epilepticus (SE) in children with cardiac disease is challenging given their often-tenuous hemodynamic state. We aim to determine whether ketamine is safe and effective in children with cardiac disease as the first-line continuous infusion for the treatment of refractory SE (RSE) and to compare ketamine to midazolam for the treatment of RSE in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with cardiac disease and RSE admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit at a tertiary children's hospital between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2023. Consecutive patients < 18 years of age who had electroencephalogram-confirmed RSE treated with a continuous infusion of ketamine and/or midazolam were included. Clinical variables were extracted from the electronic medical record, and descriptive statistics were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients with cardiac disease and RSE were treated with a continuous infusion: 15 were treated with ketamine first, and 19 were treated with midazolam first. An equivalent number of patients in both groups required a single infusion for seizure cessation (11 [73%] in the ketamine group and 12 [63%] in the midazolam group; p = 0.72). The median time from seizure onset to seizure cessation, time from seizure onset to initiation of a continuous infusion, time from initiation of a continuous infusion to seizure cessation, infusion duration, and recurrence of seizures during weaning of the continuous infusion were comparable between groups. There was no difference between groups in the proportion of patients who experienced potential adverse events attributable to their continuous infusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective cohort study provides evidence that ketamine may be as effective as midazolam as the first-line continuous infusion for RSE in children with cardiac disease. This study also provides preliminary evidence of safety in this population, at least in comparison to midazolam.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"130-140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02212-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The treatment of status epilepticus (SE) in children with cardiac disease is challenging given their often-tenuous hemodynamic state. We aim to determine whether ketamine is safe and effective in children with cardiac disease as the first-line continuous infusion for the treatment of refractory SE (RSE) and to compare ketamine to midazolam for the treatment of RSE in this population.

Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with cardiac disease and RSE admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit at a tertiary children's hospital between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2023. Consecutive patients < 18 years of age who had electroencephalogram-confirmed RSE treated with a continuous infusion of ketamine and/or midazolam were included. Clinical variables were extracted from the electronic medical record, and descriptive statistics were used.

Results: Thirty-four patients with cardiac disease and RSE were treated with a continuous infusion: 15 were treated with ketamine first, and 19 were treated with midazolam first. An equivalent number of patients in both groups required a single infusion for seizure cessation (11 [73%] in the ketamine group and 12 [63%] in the midazolam group; p = 0.72). The median time from seizure onset to seizure cessation, time from seizure onset to initiation of a continuous infusion, time from initiation of a continuous infusion to seizure cessation, infusion duration, and recurrence of seizures during weaning of the continuous infusion were comparable between groups. There was no difference between groups in the proportion of patients who experienced potential adverse events attributable to their continuous infusion.

Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study provides evidence that ketamine may be as effective as midazolam as the first-line continuous infusion for RSE in children with cardiac disease. This study also provides preliminary evidence of safety in this population, at least in comparison to midazolam.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氯胺酮与咪达唑仑作为一线连续输注治疗心脏病患儿癫痫持续状态的比较。
背景:治疗癫痫持续状态(SE)的儿童心脏疾病是具有挑战性的,因为他们往往脆弱的血液动力学状态。我们的目的是确定氯胺酮作为一线持续输注治疗难治性SE (RSE)的儿童心脏病患者是否安全有效,并比较氯胺酮与咪达唑仑在这一人群中治疗RSE的效果。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2017年1月1日至2023年6月30日在某三级儿童医院心脏重症监护室住院的患有心脏病和RSE的儿科患者。结果:连续输注34例心脏病合并RSE患者,先用氯胺酮治疗15例,先用咪达唑仑治疗19例。两组中相同数量的患者需要单次输液来停止癫痫发作(氯胺酮组11例[73%],咪达唑仑组12例[63%];p = 0.72)。从癫痫发作到癫痫停止的中位时间,从癫痫发作到开始持续输注的时间,从开始持续输注到癫痫停止的时间,输注时间,以及停药期间癫痫的复发在两组之间具有可比性。两组之间因持续输注而发生潜在不良事件的患者比例没有差异。结论:本回顾性队列研究提供证据,氯胺酮可能与咪达唑仑作为一线连续输注治疗心脏病患儿RSE的效果相同。该研究还提供了该人群安全性的初步证据,至少与咪达唑仑相比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
期刊最新文献
Response to Letter by Michael Veldeman Regarding Article "Impact of Nimodipine-Induced Blood Pressure Reductions on Cerebral Autoregulation and Functional Outcome after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage". Comment on "The Discriminative Ability of ROTEM for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Poor Outcome Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage". Commentary on: "Impact of Nimodipine-Induced Blood Pressure Reductions on Cerebral Autoregulation and Functional Outcome after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage". Operator and Modality-Dependent Limitations of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Sonography for Raised ICP in TBI: A Meta-Regression of Diagnostic Accuracy. Valproic acid for the management of agitation in neurosurgical intensive care unit patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1