Perceived Preparedness for the Clinical Practice Among Medical Interns: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S466627
Wadeia Mohammad Sharief, Nehad Hassan Mahdy, Mohamed Al-Eraky
{"title":"Perceived Preparedness for the Clinical Practice Among Medical Interns: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Wadeia Mohammad Sharief, Nehad Hassan Mahdy, Mohamed Al-Eraky","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S466627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measurement of medical graduates' perception of their internship program can help to improve the program to guarantee the general satisfaction of medical interns and enhance their clinical training.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the medical interns' perceived preparedness for clinical practice and investigate the contributing elements.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was carried out to include 109 medical interns. Assessment preparedness for hospital practice questionnaire in Hospitals was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For clinical practice, the vast majority of participants (81.7%) were either fully or very well prepared. However, no statistically significant relationship was observed between the intern characteristics and preparedness level. It was found that the interns were not well prepared regarding handling emergencies, dealing with dying patients (44%), inserting an intravenous line (35.8%), conducting a digital-rectal examination (31.2%), as well as speaking with the social worker about the patient (29%). Males scored significantly higher than females regarding the interpersonal domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion & recommendations: </strong>The results revealed that most interns were adequately trained for their clinical experiences. More emphasis on training in emergencies, catheterization, insertion of intravenous lines, and dealing with dying patients is required, in addition to continuous assessment of the interns after each clinical rotation to discover the areas of weakness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"69-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S466627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measurement of medical graduates' perception of their internship program can help to improve the program to guarantee the general satisfaction of medical interns and enhance their clinical training.

Objective: To evaluate the medical interns' perceived preparedness for clinical practice and investigate the contributing elements.

Method: The study was carried out to include 109 medical interns. Assessment preparedness for hospital practice questionnaire in Hospitals was used.

Results: For clinical practice, the vast majority of participants (81.7%) were either fully or very well prepared. However, no statistically significant relationship was observed between the intern characteristics and preparedness level. It was found that the interns were not well prepared regarding handling emergencies, dealing with dying patients (44%), inserting an intravenous line (35.8%), conducting a digital-rectal examination (31.2%), as well as speaking with the social worker about the patient (29%). Males scored significantly higher than females regarding the interpersonal domain.

Conclusion & recommendations: The results revealed that most interns were adequately trained for their clinical experiences. More emphasis on training in emergencies, catheterization, insertion of intravenous lines, and dealing with dying patients is required, in addition to continuous assessment of the interns after each clinical rotation to discover the areas of weakness.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学实习生临床实践的感知准备:一项横断面研究。
背景:测量医学毕业生对实习计划的认知,有助于改进实习计划,保证实习生的总体满意度,提高实习生的临床培训水平。目的:评价医学实习生临床实习的感知准备情况,并探讨影响因素。方法:以109名实习医师为研究对象。采用医院实践评估准备问卷。结果:在临床实践中,绝大多数参与者(81.7%)做好了充分或非常充分的准备。然而,实习生特征与准备水平之间没有统计学上的显著关系。调查发现,实习生在处理紧急情况、处理临终病人(44%)、插入静脉注射管(35.8%)、进行直肠指检(31.2%)以及与社工谈论病人(29%)方面准备不足。在人际关系方面,男性的得分明显高于女性。结论与建议:结果显示,大多数实习生接受了充分的临床经验培训。除了在每次临床轮转后对实习生进行持续评估以发现薄弱环节外,还需要更多地强调在紧急情况、置管、静脉插管和处理垂死病人方面的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Scholarly Research Output and Trends in Medical Education from the Arab Region (2005-2024): A Bibliometric Analysis. Diagnostic Accuracy and Educational Value of the RIPASA Score in Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Study in an Emergency Department Training Setting. Comparative Impact of ChatGPT and Conventional Search Tools on Clinical Reasoning Performance: A Randomized Crossover Study in Preclinical Medical Students. Enlightened Change Agents or Nuisance Power? A Qualitative Interview Study Exploring How Hospital Board Members Deal with Dissenting Opinions. The Silent "Teacher": A Conceptual Framework and Teaching Model for Cultivating Medical Humanities in Morphological Experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1