Wenhai Fan, Zhenjiang Wu, Shenghao Xu, Zhiheng Liu, Yiming Huang, Pan Wang
{"title":"Mendelian randomization analysis of plasma proteins reveals potential novel tumor markers for gastric cancer.","authors":"Wenhai Fan, Zhenjiang Wu, Shenghao Xu, Zhiheng Liu, Yiming Huang, Pan Wang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-88118-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to elucidate the potential causal relationship between 4,907 plasma proteins and the risk of gastric cancer using a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach. We utilized genome-wide association study (GWAS) data to perform two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses, treating the 4,907 plasma proteins as exposure factors and gastric cancer as the outcome. Instrumental variables for plasma proteins were selected based on strongly correlated SNPs identified through data processing and screening of the GWAS data provided by the deCode database. We employed a set of statistical methods centered on inverse variance weighting (IVW) for Mendelian randomization analysis to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for the effects of these plasma proteins on gastric cancer susceptibility. According to the IVW method, 14 plasma proteins were associated with gastric cancer (p < 0.005). Specifically, CHST15 (OR = 0.7553, 95% CI = 0.6346 - 0.8988), L1CAM (OR = 0.7230, 95% CI = 0.5876 - 0.8896), FTMT (OR = 0.8246, 95% CI = 0.7241 - 0.9391), and PMM2 (OR = 0.5767, 95% CI = 0.3943 - 0.8433) were negatively correlated with GASTRIC CANCER, whereas ABO (OR = 1.1868, 95% CI = 1.0638 - 1.3240), FAM3D (OR = 1.2109, 95% CI = 1.0850 - 1.3515), FAM3B (OR = 1.2988, 95% CI = 1.0953 - 1.5402), ADH7 (OR = 1.3568, 95% CI = 1.1044 - 1.6670), MAP1LC3A (OR = 1.3704, 95% CI = 1.1194 - 1.6778), PGLYRP1 (OR = 1.4071, 95% CI = 1.1235 - 1.7623), PDE5A (OR = 1.7446, 95% CI = 1.2693 - 2.3978), GLUL (OR = 3.1203, 95% CI = 1.5017 - 6.4839), NFE2L1 (OR = 3.1759, 95% CI = 1.6163 - 6.2402), and MAFG (OR = 3.1945, 95% CI = 1.5329 - 6.6575) were positively correlated. Convergent results from Weighted Median and MR-Egger analyses confirmed these associations. Reverse Mendelian randomization analysis indicated that gastric cancer does not significantly alter the levels of these 14 plasma proteins (p > 0.05). Sensitivity analyses, including assessments of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy, confirmed the robustness and reliability of our findings without significant bias. Pathway enrichment analysis of gene expression associated with these 14 plasma proteins, using GO and KEGG pathways, revealed that CHST15, L1CAM, FTMT, and PMM2 may serve as protective factors against gastric cancer, while ABO, FAM3D, FAM3B, ADH7, MAP1LC3A, PGLYRP1, PDE5A, GLUL, NFE2L1, and MAFG may contribute to gastric cancer pathogenesis. These results highlight the complex biological interactions between plasma proteins and tumorigenesis, providing valuable insights for preventive and therapeutic strategies in gastric malignancy management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"3537"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88118-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to elucidate the potential causal relationship between 4,907 plasma proteins and the risk of gastric cancer using a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach. We utilized genome-wide association study (GWAS) data to perform two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses, treating the 4,907 plasma proteins as exposure factors and gastric cancer as the outcome. Instrumental variables for plasma proteins were selected based on strongly correlated SNPs identified through data processing and screening of the GWAS data provided by the deCode database. We employed a set of statistical methods centered on inverse variance weighting (IVW) for Mendelian randomization analysis to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for the effects of these plasma proteins on gastric cancer susceptibility. According to the IVW method, 14 plasma proteins were associated with gastric cancer (p < 0.005). Specifically, CHST15 (OR = 0.7553, 95% CI = 0.6346 - 0.8988), L1CAM (OR = 0.7230, 95% CI = 0.5876 - 0.8896), FTMT (OR = 0.8246, 95% CI = 0.7241 - 0.9391), and PMM2 (OR = 0.5767, 95% CI = 0.3943 - 0.8433) were negatively correlated with GASTRIC CANCER, whereas ABO (OR = 1.1868, 95% CI = 1.0638 - 1.3240), FAM3D (OR = 1.2109, 95% CI = 1.0850 - 1.3515), FAM3B (OR = 1.2988, 95% CI = 1.0953 - 1.5402), ADH7 (OR = 1.3568, 95% CI = 1.1044 - 1.6670), MAP1LC3A (OR = 1.3704, 95% CI = 1.1194 - 1.6778), PGLYRP1 (OR = 1.4071, 95% CI = 1.1235 - 1.7623), PDE5A (OR = 1.7446, 95% CI = 1.2693 - 2.3978), GLUL (OR = 3.1203, 95% CI = 1.5017 - 6.4839), NFE2L1 (OR = 3.1759, 95% CI = 1.6163 - 6.2402), and MAFG (OR = 3.1945, 95% CI = 1.5329 - 6.6575) were positively correlated. Convergent results from Weighted Median and MR-Egger analyses confirmed these associations. Reverse Mendelian randomization analysis indicated that gastric cancer does not significantly alter the levels of these 14 plasma proteins (p > 0.05). Sensitivity analyses, including assessments of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy, confirmed the robustness and reliability of our findings without significant bias. Pathway enrichment analysis of gene expression associated with these 14 plasma proteins, using GO and KEGG pathways, revealed that CHST15, L1CAM, FTMT, and PMM2 may serve as protective factors against gastric cancer, while ABO, FAM3D, FAM3B, ADH7, MAP1LC3A, PGLYRP1, PDE5A, GLUL, NFE2L1, and MAFG may contribute to gastric cancer pathogenesis. These results highlight the complex biological interactions between plasma proteins and tumorigenesis, providing valuable insights for preventive and therapeutic strategies in gastric malignancy management.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.