Anatomical Location of the Bowel in Different Surgical Positions: Implications for Lateral Access in Prone Single-Position Surgery.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005272
S Harrison Farber, Robert F Rudy, James J Zhou, Nima Alan, Joseph D DiDomenico, Luke K O'Neill, Gabriella P Williams, Lea M Alhilali, Jay D Turner, Juan S Uribe
{"title":"Anatomical Location of the Bowel in Different Surgical Positions: Implications for Lateral Access in Prone Single-Position Surgery.","authors":"S Harrison Farber, Robert F Rudy, James J Zhou, Nima Alan, Joseph D DiDomenico, Luke K O'Neill, Gabriella P Williams, Lea M Alhilali, Jay D Turner, Juan S Uribe","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Radiographic analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the anatomical relationships of the bowel to the lateral surgical corridor and the spine in various surgical positions.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Retroperitoneal transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) may be performed with patients in the prone position, allowing for lateral and posterior approaches to the spine without repositioning the patient. Few, if any, studies discuss changes of the bowel position during these procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten healthy volunteers underwent MRI in 3 positions: supine, prone with hips extended (prone-extension), and right lateral decubitus (left side up) with hips flexed (lateral decubitus-flexion). Anatomical relationships of the bowel to fixed spinal landmarks were assessed at L1-5, and the changes among participants' positions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anterior bowel movement was noted with prone-extension (range: 0.32-1.39 cm) and lateral decubitus-flexion (range: 0.97-2.18 cm) positioning compared with supine positioning. Significant anterior movement of the bowel was observed at L1-2 (P=0.03) and L2-3 (P=0.04) disc levels in participants in the prone position and at L2-3 (P=0.002) and L3-4 (P=0.01) in those in the lateral position when compared with those in the supine position. No differences in bowel movement were found for prone and lateral positioning. The percentages of participants with bowels located in the operative corridor were similar among the surgical positions (all P>0.07). 3D volumetric analysis showed that the magnitude of these changes was greatest for the upper left colon.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results showed that the bowel was positioned anteriorly at L1-5 disc levels when participants were in prone-extension and lateral decubitus-flexion positions compared with the supine position. Overall, the magnitude of bowel positional change was small and variable. These findings suggest that the bowel does not fall away from the surgical corridor when performing retroperitoneal access for single-position prone surgery compared with the lateral decubitus-flexion position.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Radiographic analysis.

Objective: Evaluate the anatomical relationships of the bowel to the lateral surgical corridor and the spine in various surgical positions.

Summary of background data: Retroperitoneal transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) may be performed with patients in the prone position, allowing for lateral and posterior approaches to the spine without repositioning the patient. Few, if any, studies discuss changes of the bowel position during these procedures.

Methods: Ten healthy volunteers underwent MRI in 3 positions: supine, prone with hips extended (prone-extension), and right lateral decubitus (left side up) with hips flexed (lateral decubitus-flexion). Anatomical relationships of the bowel to fixed spinal landmarks were assessed at L1-5, and the changes among participants' positions were compared.

Results: Anterior bowel movement was noted with prone-extension (range: 0.32-1.39 cm) and lateral decubitus-flexion (range: 0.97-2.18 cm) positioning compared with supine positioning. Significant anterior movement of the bowel was observed at L1-2 (P=0.03) and L2-3 (P=0.04) disc levels in participants in the prone position and at L2-3 (P=0.002) and L3-4 (P=0.01) in those in the lateral position when compared with those in the supine position. No differences in bowel movement were found for prone and lateral positioning. The percentages of participants with bowels located in the operative corridor were similar among the surgical positions (all P>0.07). 3D volumetric analysis showed that the magnitude of these changes was greatest for the upper left colon.

Conclusions: The results showed that the bowel was positioned anteriorly at L1-5 disc levels when participants were in prone-extension and lateral decubitus-flexion positions compared with the supine position. Overall, the magnitude of bowel positional change was small and variable. These findings suggest that the bowel does not fall away from the surgical corridor when performing retroperitoneal access for single-position prone surgery compared with the lateral decubitus-flexion position.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Morbidly Obese Patients Have Similar Clinical Outcomes and Recovery Kinetics After Minimally Invasive Decompression. Establishing a Benchmark for Iatrogenic Hemodilution and Blood Transfusion in Long-Segment Spine Fusion Surgery. Immediate Postoperative Change in the Upper Instrumented Screw-Vertebra Angle is a Predictor for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure. The Impact of the Preoperative Mental Health Component Summary (MCS) Score on Short-Term Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion. Risk Factors of Failed Conservative Treatment for Adjacent Vertebral Fractures Following Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1