Anatomic Location of the Bowel in Different Surgical Positions: Implications for Lateral Access in Prone Single-Position Surgery.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2025-11-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005272
S Harrison Farber, Robert F Rudy, James J Zhou, Nima Alan, Joseph D DiDomenico, Luke K O'Neill, Gabriella P Williams, Lea M Alhilali, Jay D Turner, Juan S Uribe
{"title":"Anatomic Location of the Bowel in Different Surgical Positions: Implications for Lateral Access in Prone Single-Position Surgery.","authors":"S Harrison Farber, Robert F Rudy, James J Zhou, Nima Alan, Joseph D DiDomenico, Luke K O'Neill, Gabriella P Williams, Lea M Alhilali, Jay D Turner, Juan S Uribe","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Radiographic analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the anatomic relationships of the bowel to the lateral surgical corridor and the spine in various surgical positions.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Retroperitoneal transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) may be performed with patients in the prone position, allowing for lateral and posterior approaches to the spine without repositioning the patient. Few, if any, studies discuss changes of the bowel position during these procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten healthy volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging in three positions: supine, prone with hips extended (prone-extension), and right lateral decubitus (left side up) with hips flexed (lateral decubitus-flexion). Anatomic relationships of the bowel to fixed spinal landmarks were assessed at L1-L5, and the changes among participants' positions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anterior bowel movement was noted with prone-extension (range: 0.32-1.39 cm) and lateral decubitus-flexion (range: 0.97-2.18 cm) positioning compared with supine positioning. Significant anterior movement of the bowel was observed at L1-2 ( P =0.03) and L2-3 ( P =0.04) disc levels in participants in the prone position and at L2-3 ( P =0.002) and L3-4 ( P =0.01) in those in the lateral position when compared with those in the supine position. No differences in bowel movement were found for prone and lateral positioning. The percentages of participants with bowels located in the operative corridor were similar among the surgical positions (all P >0.07). 3D volumetric analysis showed that the magnitude of these changes was greatest for the upper left colon.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results showed that the bowel was positioned anteriorly at L1-L5 disc levels when participants were in prone-extension and lateral decubitus-flexion positions compared with the supine position. Overall, the magnitude of bowel positional change was small and variable. These findings suggest that the bowel does not fall away from the surgical corridor when performing retroperitoneal access for single-position prone surgery compared with the lateral decubitus-flexion position.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"E451-E456"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Radiographic analysis.

Objective: Evaluate the anatomic relationships of the bowel to the lateral surgical corridor and the spine in various surgical positions.

Summary of background data: Retroperitoneal transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) may be performed with patients in the prone position, allowing for lateral and posterior approaches to the spine without repositioning the patient. Few, if any, studies discuss changes of the bowel position during these procedures.

Materials and methods: Ten healthy volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging in three positions: supine, prone with hips extended (prone-extension), and right lateral decubitus (left side up) with hips flexed (lateral decubitus-flexion). Anatomic relationships of the bowel to fixed spinal landmarks were assessed at L1-L5, and the changes among participants' positions were compared.

Results: Anterior bowel movement was noted with prone-extension (range: 0.32-1.39 cm) and lateral decubitus-flexion (range: 0.97-2.18 cm) positioning compared with supine positioning. Significant anterior movement of the bowel was observed at L1-2 ( P =0.03) and L2-3 ( P =0.04) disc levels in participants in the prone position and at L2-3 ( P =0.002) and L3-4 ( P =0.01) in those in the lateral position when compared with those in the supine position. No differences in bowel movement were found for prone and lateral positioning. The percentages of participants with bowels located in the operative corridor were similar among the surgical positions (all P >0.07). 3D volumetric analysis showed that the magnitude of these changes was greatest for the upper left colon.

Conclusions: The results showed that the bowel was positioned anteriorly at L1-L5 disc levels when participants were in prone-extension and lateral decubitus-flexion positions compared with the supine position. Overall, the magnitude of bowel positional change was small and variable. These findings suggest that the bowel does not fall away from the surgical corridor when performing retroperitoneal access for single-position prone surgery compared with the lateral decubitus-flexion position.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠在不同手术体位的解剖位置:俯卧位单体位手术侧入路的意义。
研究设计:放射学分析。目的:评价不同体位下肠与手术外侧通道及脊柱的解剖关系。背景资料总结:俯卧位患者可进行腹膜后经腰肌外侧腰椎椎体间融合术(LLIF),允许脊柱外侧和后路入路,而无需重新定位患者。很少有研究讨论这些手术过程中肠道位置的变化。方法:10名健康志愿者分别采用仰卧位、俯卧位髋前伸位(俯卧位-髋前伸位)和右侧侧卧位(左侧上仰位)髋后屈位(侧卧位-髋后屈位)3种体位进行MRI检查。在L1-5处评估肠与固定脊柱地标的解剖关系,并比较参与者位置的变化。结果:与仰卧位相比,俯卧位(范围:0.32-1.39 cm)和侧卧位(范围:0.97-2.18 cm)的前倾排便明显。与仰卧位的参与者相比,俯卧位的参与者在L1-2 (P=0.03)和L2-3 (P=0.04)椎间盘水平上观察到明显的肠道前移,侧卧位的参与者在L2-3 (P=0.002)和L3-4 (P=0.01)。俯卧位和侧卧位的排便无差异。肠道位于手术通道的参与者的百分比在手术体位中相似(均P < 0.07)。三维体积分析显示,这些变化的幅度在左上结肠最大。结论:结果显示,与仰卧位相比,当参与者处于俯卧位和侧卧位时,肠道位于L1-5椎间盘水平的前方。总体而言,肠道位置改变的幅度很小且变化不定。这些结果表明,与侧卧位-屈曲位相比,单体位俯卧手术进行腹膜后入路时,肠道不会脱离手术通道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Inpatient and Outpatient Palliative Care Utilization Rates of Patients With Spine Metastases. Breaking Down Instability: The Associations Between Muscle Health, Facet Joint Morphology, Spinopelvic Alignment, and Stability Status in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Posterior Spinal Fusion With Rib Resection Allows for Improved Deformity Correction as Well as Patient Satisfaction. The Relationship of CT Hounsfield Units at UIV+1 and UIV+2 Relative to UIV Predicts Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Patients With Long Spinal Constructs. Preoperative Predictors of Poor Outcomes Following Lumbar Discectomy. A Study Based on the National Finspine Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1