Independent risk factors for twin pregnancy adverse fetal outcomes before 28 gestational week by first trimester ultrasound screening.

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING World journal of radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.103111
Hui-Ping Zhang, Li Bao, Jing-Jing Wu, Yu-Qing Zhou
{"title":"Independent risk factors for twin pregnancy adverse fetal outcomes before 28 gestational week by first trimester ultrasound screening.","authors":"Hui-Ping Zhang, Li Bao, Jing-Jing Wu, Yu-Qing Zhou","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.103111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of multiple pregnancies has increased worldwide recently and women with a twin pregnancy are at higher risk of adverse outcomes compared with women with a singleton pregnancy. It is important to understand the risk factors for adverse fetal outcomes in twin pregnancy in order to guide clinical management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the independent risk factors, including maternal personal and family medical histories and first trimester ultrasound screening findings, for adverse fetal outcomes of twin pregnancy before 28 weeks of gestation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of 126 twin pregnancies in our hospital, including pregnancy outcomes, first trimester ultrasound screening findings and maternal medical history, were retrospectively collected. Twenty-nine women with adverse outcomes were included in the abnormal group and the remaining 97 women were included in the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the abnormal group were more likely to be monochorionic diamniotic (13/29 <i>vs</i> 20/97, <i>P</i>= 0.009), with a higher mean pulsatility index (PI, 1.57 ± 0.55 <i>vs</i> 1.28 ± 0.42, <i>P</i> = 0.003; cutoff value: 1.393) or a higher mean resistance index (0.71 ± 0.11 <i>vs</i> 0.65 ± 0.11, <i>P</i> = 0.008; cutoff value: 0.683) or early diastolic notch of bilateral uterine arteries (UtAs, 10/29 <i>vs</i> 15/97, <i>P</i> = 0.024) or with abnormal ultrasound findings (13/29 <i>vs</i> 2/97, <i>P</i> < 0.001), compared with the control group. Monochorionic diamnioticity, higher mean PI of bilateral UtAs and abnormal ultrasound findings during first trimester screening were independent risk factors for adverse fetal outcomes (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First trimester ultrasound screening for twin pregnancy identifies independent risk factors and is useful for the prediction of fetal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":"17 1","pages":"103111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.103111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of multiple pregnancies has increased worldwide recently and women with a twin pregnancy are at higher risk of adverse outcomes compared with women with a singleton pregnancy. It is important to understand the risk factors for adverse fetal outcomes in twin pregnancy in order to guide clinical management.

Aim: To identify the independent risk factors, including maternal personal and family medical histories and first trimester ultrasound screening findings, for adverse fetal outcomes of twin pregnancy before 28 weeks of gestation.

Methods: The data of 126 twin pregnancies in our hospital, including pregnancy outcomes, first trimester ultrasound screening findings and maternal medical history, were retrospectively collected. Twenty-nine women with adverse outcomes were included in the abnormal group and the remaining 97 women were included in the control group.

Results: Patients in the abnormal group were more likely to be monochorionic diamniotic (13/29 vs 20/97, P= 0.009), with a higher mean pulsatility index (PI, 1.57 ± 0.55 vs 1.28 ± 0.42, P = 0.003; cutoff value: 1.393) or a higher mean resistance index (0.71 ± 0.11 vs 0.65 ± 0.11, P = 0.008; cutoff value: 0.683) or early diastolic notch of bilateral uterine arteries (UtAs, 10/29 vs 15/97, P = 0.024) or with abnormal ultrasound findings (13/29 vs 2/97, P < 0.001), compared with the control group. Monochorionic diamnioticity, higher mean PI of bilateral UtAs and abnormal ultrasound findings during first trimester screening were independent risk factors for adverse fetal outcomes (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: First trimester ultrasound screening for twin pregnancy identifies independent risk factors and is useful for the prediction of fetal outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World journal of radiology
World journal of radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
8.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
High-resolution direct magnetic resonance imaging fistulography with hydrogen peroxide for diagnosing anorectal fistula: A preliminary retrospective study. Differentiating between immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis and cardiac metastasis in a cardio-oncology patient presenting with myocardial infarction: A case report. Independent risk factors for twin pregnancy adverse fetal outcomes before 28 gestational week by first trimester ultrasound screening. Precision oncology: The role of minimally-invasive ablation therapy in the management of solid organ tumors. Rare mixed dementia: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1