Preoperative Optimization of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Single Institution Cohort.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000464
Julia Kessel, Rebecca J Cleveland, Trapper Lalli, Joshua Tennant, Jennifer Woody
{"title":"Preoperative Optimization of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Single Institution Cohort.","authors":"Julia Kessel, Rebecca J Cleveland, Trapper Lalli, Joshua Tennant, Jennifer Woody","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Careful preoperative patient preparation for orthopedic foot and ankle surgery can help manage postoperative expectations and avoid suboptimal outcomes. Our quality improvement initiative aimed to reduce emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days postsurgery by enhancing preoperative education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We focused on four outcomes associated with receipt of written preoperative information: (1) related ED visits within 30 days of surgery, (2) average number of patient portal messages, (3) phone calls initiated by patients, and (4) staff team experience survey results. All patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery by two surgeons at one institution from July 2023 to January 2024 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through a series of six plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycles lasting 1 month each, we evaluated 431 patients (55.9% female, 61.4% White, 92.4% English speakers). Patients who received written preoperative information were significantly less likely to present to the ED for related concerns within 30 days of surgery compared with those receiving no written preoperative information (p = .0068). In addition, we observed fewer portal messages and phone calls from patients receiving written preoperative information (p = .3644, p = .0541).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An increase in the use of standardized written preoperative information yields decreased ED visits and frequency of inquiries from patients through portal messages and phone calls.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Careful preoperative patient preparation for orthopedic foot and ankle surgery can help manage postoperative expectations and avoid suboptimal outcomes. Our quality improvement initiative aimed to reduce emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days postsurgery by enhancing preoperative education.

Methods: We focused on four outcomes associated with receipt of written preoperative information: (1) related ED visits within 30 days of surgery, (2) average number of patient portal messages, (3) phone calls initiated by patients, and (4) staff team experience survey results. All patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery by two surgeons at one institution from July 2023 to January 2024 were included.

Results: Through a series of six plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycles lasting 1 month each, we evaluated 431 patients (55.9% female, 61.4% White, 92.4% English speakers). Patients who received written preoperative information were significantly less likely to present to the ED for related concerns within 30 days of surgery compared with those receiving no written preoperative information (p = .0068). In addition, we observed fewer portal messages and phone calls from patients receiving written preoperative information (p = .3644, p = .0541).

Conclusions: An increase in the use of standardized written preoperative information yields decreased ED visits and frequency of inquiries from patients through portal messages and phone calls.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
期刊最新文献
Continuous Quality Improvement in Social Needs Screening: Evaluation of an Intervention in Bariatric Specialty Care. Electronic Clinical Quality Measures for Prosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: Pitfalls and Potential. Using Broken Windows Theory to Examine Flow Disruptions in Surgical Care: A Multispecialty Comparison. Optimizing Workplace Violence Reporting in a Multisite Hospital Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Preoperative Optimization of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Single Institution Cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1