Urban, formerly incarcerated, black, heterosexual men with substance use disorders: eligible for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) but unaware of their vulnerability to HIV acquisition.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1080/09540121.2024.2445792
Rogério M Pinto, Isabella Bonnewit, Evan Hall, Carol A Lee, Liliane Windsor
{"title":"Urban, formerly incarcerated, black, heterosexual men with substance use disorders: eligible for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) but unaware of their vulnerability to HIV acquisition.","authors":"Rogério M Pinto, Isabella Bonnewit, Evan Hall, Carol A Lee, Liliane Windsor","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2024.2445792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on incarcerated men indicates low PrEP access even though HIV disproportionately affects them. Intersecting attributes - urban, incarcerated, Black, heterosexual men with substance use diagnoses (SUDs) - improves the odds of HIV transmission/acquisition. It is crucial to determine, among \"key populations,\" who might be eligible to take PrEP. PrEP eligibility criteria have been used inconsistently in research. This exploratory, quantitative, study uses criteria from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to determine eligibility: HIV-negative test and sexually active plus a sexual partner living with HIV and/or diagnosed with an STI and/or inconsistent or no condom use for intercourse. We found a considerable percentage (<i>n</i> = 61; 32.8%) of PrEP-eligible individuals (<i>n</i> = 186) in a sample of urban, formerly incarcerated, Black, heterosexual men with SUDs. Most PrEP-eligible participants (78.7%) did not receive PrEP information from health service providers. Most participants (85.2%) reported they were \"not likely\" to contract HIV. This study demonstrates the accurate determination of PrEP eligibility and the need to assess individuals' awareness of their vulnerabilities to HIV acquisition - the first step needed before accessing PrEP. Interventions to improve PrEP access must focus on the accurate determination of PrEP eligibility, individuals' awareness of their vulnerability to HIV acquisition and how/when they receive information about PrEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"445-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2024.2445792","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on incarcerated men indicates low PrEP access even though HIV disproportionately affects them. Intersecting attributes - urban, incarcerated, Black, heterosexual men with substance use diagnoses (SUDs) - improves the odds of HIV transmission/acquisition. It is crucial to determine, among "key populations," who might be eligible to take PrEP. PrEP eligibility criteria have been used inconsistently in research. This exploratory, quantitative, study uses criteria from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to determine eligibility: HIV-negative test and sexually active plus a sexual partner living with HIV and/or diagnosed with an STI and/or inconsistent or no condom use for intercourse. We found a considerable percentage (n = 61; 32.8%) of PrEP-eligible individuals (n = 186) in a sample of urban, formerly incarcerated, Black, heterosexual men with SUDs. Most PrEP-eligible participants (78.7%) did not receive PrEP information from health service providers. Most participants (85.2%) reported they were "not likely" to contract HIV. This study demonstrates the accurate determination of PrEP eligibility and the need to assess individuals' awareness of their vulnerabilities to HIV acquisition - the first step needed before accessing PrEP. Interventions to improve PrEP access must focus on the accurate determination of PrEP eligibility, individuals' awareness of their vulnerability to HIV acquisition and how/when they receive information about PrEP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市,曾被监禁,黑人,异性恋男性,有药物使用障碍:符合暴露前预防(PrEP)的条件,但不知道自己易感染艾滋病毒。
对被监禁的男性的研究表明,尽管艾滋病毒对他们的影响不成比例,但他们获得PrEP的机会很少。交叉属性-城市,监禁,黑人,异性恋男性与药物使用诊断(sud) -提高了艾滋病毒传播/获得的几率。在“关键人群”中确定谁可能有资格服用PrEP是至关重要的。PrEP的资格标准在研究中使用不一致。这项探索性定量研究使用美国疾病控制和预防中心的标准来确定资格:艾滋病毒检测呈阴性,性活跃且性伴侣感染艾滋病毒和/或被诊断患有性传播感染和/或不一致或不使用避孕套进行性交。我们发现相当大的比例(n = 61;32.8%)符合prep条件的个体(n = 186),样本为城市,曾被监禁的黑人异性恋男性。大多数符合PrEP条件的参与者(78.7%)没有从卫生服务提供者那里获得PrEP信息。大多数参与者(85.2%)报告说他们“不太可能”感染艾滋病毒。这项研究证明了准确确定PrEP资格和评估个人对艾滋病毒易感性的认识的必要性-这是获得PrEP之前需要的第一步。改善PrEP获取的干预措施必须集中在准确确定PrEP资格,个人对艾滋病毒易感性的认识以及他们如何/何时接收有关PrEP的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
期刊最新文献
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV: A secular comparison of willingness to use PrEP among black cisgender women in the United States. Understanding problematic versus non-problematic chemsex practices from a user's perspective: a qualitative study. A global scoping review of published HIV disclosure counselling guidelines. From setbacks to progress: Brazilian faculty perspectives on teaching sexually transmitted infections to undergraduate nursing students - A qualitative study. "I have many burdens": experiences and perceptions of vulnerabilities, healthcare, and support among PLHIV in Sweden: a qualitative interview study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1