The learning curve for hood-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJUI compass Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1002/bco2.463
Keith R. S. Simpson, Jamie Krishnan, Linda Taylor, Alan McNeill, Daniel W. Good
{"title":"The learning curve for hood-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience","authors":"Keith R. S. Simpson,&nbsp;Jamie Krishnan,&nbsp;Linda Taylor,&nbsp;Alan McNeill,&nbsp;Daniel W. Good","doi":"10.1002/bco2.463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the impact of anterior hood-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with posterior-anterior reconstruction in a single-surgeon series by analysing oncological and functional continence outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We carried out a cohort comparison study of a prospectively collected single-surgeon series. The surgeon was an ‘in-training’ fellowship trained surgeon in their first 2 years of independent practice. There were three cohorts identified from electronic and scanned paper operation notes. The first cohort of standard anterior RARP (no hood sparing) included initial patients and any patient in the consecutive series who had completed 3 month FU after RARP. The second cohort was hemi-hood-sparing RARP again within the consecutive database of patients and lastly full-hood-sparing RARP. Early continence was defined by patients reporting being ‘dry’ and with 0 pad or 1 confidence/security pad. Data was collected in an Excel spreadsheet, and SPSS was used to assess distribution with non-parametric data being analysed using a Mann Whitney <i>U</i> test and parametric data with an unpaired <i>t</i>-test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 174 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 who were operated on. Full pathology and 6-week follow-up pad use data was available for all patients. At 12 months, some data for EPIC-26 was not available (lack of response/clinic non-attendance). The results demonstrate doubling in early continence to over 75% at 6-week follow-up with comparable positive margin rates. This difference was statistically significantly better in the dorsal venous complex RARP sparing group in comparison to standard RARP (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Anterior hood-sparing RARP with anterior reconstruction is a modification to the standard anterior RARP approach with a short learning curve which provides patients with better early and late continence without compromise to oncological outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the impact of anterior hood-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with posterior-anterior reconstruction in a single-surgeon series by analysing oncological and functional continence outcomes.

Patients and Methods

We carried out a cohort comparison study of a prospectively collected single-surgeon series. The surgeon was an ‘in-training’ fellowship trained surgeon in their first 2 years of independent practice. There were three cohorts identified from electronic and scanned paper operation notes. The first cohort of standard anterior RARP (no hood sparing) included initial patients and any patient in the consecutive series who had completed 3 month FU after RARP. The second cohort was hemi-hood-sparing RARP again within the consecutive database of patients and lastly full-hood-sparing RARP. Early continence was defined by patients reporting being ‘dry’ and with 0 pad or 1 confidence/security pad. Data was collected in an Excel spreadsheet, and SPSS was used to assess distribution with non-parametric data being analysed using a Mann Whitney U test and parametric data with an unpaired t-test.

Results

We identified 174 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 who were operated on. Full pathology and 6-week follow-up pad use data was available for all patients. At 12 months, some data for EPIC-26 was not available (lack of response/clinic non-attendance). The results demonstrate doubling in early continence to over 75% at 6-week follow-up with comparable positive margin rates. This difference was statistically significantly better in the dorsal venous complex RARP sparing group in comparison to standard RARP (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Anterior hood-sparing RARP with anterior reconstruction is a modification to the standard anterior RARP approach with a short learning curve which provides patients with better early and late continence without compromise to oncological outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason scores between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen Flexible cystoscopy-guided implantation of ProACT: Surgical technique and long-term outcomes Preoperative pelvic floor muscle diameter as a predictor of postoperative urinary incontinence in robotic-assisted laparoscopic total prostatectomy Issue Information Long-term outcomes of cutaneous ureterostomy with the aim of stent-free stoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1