[Translated article] Toxicity of the FOLFOX-6 regimen, with or without 5-fluorouracil bolus, in metastatic colorectal cancer.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.farma.2024.12.006
María Teresa Garrido Martínez, María Rodríguez Jorge, Ignacio García Giménez, María Isabel Guzmán Ramos, Salvador Grutzmancher Sáiz, Victoria Aviñó Tarazona
{"title":"[Translated article] Toxicity of the FOLFOX-6 regimen, with or without 5-fluorouracil bolus, in metastatic colorectal cancer.","authors":"María Teresa Garrido Martínez, María Rodríguez Jorge, Ignacio García Giménez, María Isabel Guzmán Ramos, Salvador Grutzmancher Sáiz, Victoria Aviñó Tarazona","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer includes oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion. Although FOLFOX-6 is the reference combination, it is aggressive and has high toxicity. Variants such as the TTD regimen, which does not include folinic acid or 5-fluorouracil bolus, are used. This study evaluates the toxicity of FOLFOX-6 and TTD in first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective observational study with patients who started treatment with FOLFOX-6 and TTD, for 3 years. Demographic and clinical data were collected (age, sex, chronic pathologies, molecular profile, laterality, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group classification, and stage), as well as treatment variables (previous adjuvant chemotherapy, intentionality, number of cycles, duration, and pharmacogenetic aspects) and toxicity. Objective response rate and progression-free survival were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 71 patients, 35 treated with FOLFOX-6, and 36 with TTD. Both groups showed similar overall toxicity profiles. FOLFOX-6 had a higher incidence of neutropenia (46% vs 8%; P < .01) and mucositis (51% vs 22%; P < .013). In addition, there were more treatment delays (40% vs 11%; P < .05) and 5-fluorouracil dose reductions (22% vs 14%; P < .05) in the FOLFOX-6 group. Deaths due to toxicity were only recorded in the FOLFOX-6 group. Effectiveness was similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TTD regimen could be a beneficial first-line option for metastatic colorectal cancer, with lower toxicity and effectiveness comparable to FOLFOX-6. It is a safe alternative for elderly or frail patients, suitable for reduced-dose 5-fluorouracil regimen with oxaliplatin.</p>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2024.12.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer includes oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion. Although FOLFOX-6 is the reference combination, it is aggressive and has high toxicity. Variants such as the TTD regimen, which does not include folinic acid or 5-fluorouracil bolus, are used. This study evaluates the toxicity of FOLFOX-6 and TTD in first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and its effectiveness.

Method: Retrospective observational study with patients who started treatment with FOLFOX-6 and TTD, for 3 years. Demographic and clinical data were collected (age, sex, chronic pathologies, molecular profile, laterality, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group classification, and stage), as well as treatment variables (previous adjuvant chemotherapy, intentionality, number of cycles, duration, and pharmacogenetic aspects) and toxicity. Objective response rate and progression-free survival were calculated.

Results: The study included 71 patients, 35 treated with FOLFOX-6, and 36 with TTD. Both groups showed similar overall toxicity profiles. FOLFOX-6 had a higher incidence of neutropenia (46% vs 8%; P < .01) and mucositis (51% vs 22%; P < .013). In addition, there were more treatment delays (40% vs 11%; P < .05) and 5-fluorouracil dose reductions (22% vs 14%; P < .05) in the FOLFOX-6 group. Deaths due to toxicity were only recorded in the FOLFOX-6 group. Effectiveness was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: The TTD regimen could be a beneficial first-line option for metastatic colorectal cancer, with lower toxicity and effectiveness comparable to FOLFOX-6. It is a safe alternative for elderly or frail patients, suitable for reduced-dose 5-fluorouracil regimen with oxaliplatin.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
期刊最新文献
Stability of thermolabile drugs at room temperature. A review. Criteria for medication reconciliation in major orthopedic surgery in high-risk patients: A consensus based on the Delphi method. Messenger RNA as a new strategy against cancer. Effectiveness and safety of liposomal rapamycin for the treatment of facial angiofibromas in tuberous sclerosis. [Translated article] Pharmacokinetic-guided switching from standard half-life factor VIII to extended half-life pegylated factor VIII in haemophilia A therapy in clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1