The effect of sciatic nerve block on sciatic nerve depth and pain level in patients with ankle fracture based on different approaches under ultrasound guidance.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.013
Haiyun Dong, Penglei Ma, Jingyu Li, Yulin Wu, Wei Wang, Caixia Wang
{"title":"The effect of sciatic nerve block on sciatic nerve depth and pain level in patients with ankle fracture based on different approaches under ultrasound guidance.","authors":"Haiyun Dong, Penglei Ma, Jingyu Li, Yulin Wu, Wei Wang, Caixia Wang","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the clinical efficacy of using different approach sciatic nerve blocks on the sciatic nerve depth and pain degree in patients with ankle fracture. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 151 patients with ankle fractures who were admitted to the hospital from May 2020 to May 2023. The patients were divided into a control group (n=76) using the greater trochanteric plane approach (GTA) and an observation group (n=75) using the suprapopliteal approach (PA). Perioperative related indexes, pain levels, muscle strength, hemodynamic indexes, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups. The nerve block operation time and onset time were lower in the observation group, while the maintenance time of nerve block was higher in the observation group(P<0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 2h, 12h, and 24h postoperatively were lower in the observation group. Muscle strength of the posterior femoral muscle group was significantly better in the observation group at 8h after surgery. Hemodynamic indexes were lower in the observation group at 15minutes and 30minutes after anesthesia. The total incidence of adverse reactions was lower in the observation group compared to the control group. Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block using the suprapopliteal approach in patients with ankle fractures can help stabilize muscle strength and hemodynamics, alleviate pain symptoms, and avoid motor block and adverse reactions. This approach is recommended for adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the clinical efficacy of using different approach sciatic nerve blocks on the sciatic nerve depth and pain degree in patients with ankle fracture. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 151 patients with ankle fractures who were admitted to the hospital from May 2020 to May 2023. The patients were divided into a control group (n=76) using the greater trochanteric plane approach (GTA) and an observation group (n=75) using the suprapopliteal approach (PA). Perioperative related indexes, pain levels, muscle strength, hemodynamic indexes, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups. The nerve block operation time and onset time were lower in the observation group, while the maintenance time of nerve block was higher in the observation group(P<0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 2h, 12h, and 24h postoperatively were lower in the observation group. Muscle strength of the posterior femoral muscle group was significantly better in the observation group at 8h after surgery. Hemodynamic indexes were lower in the observation group at 15minutes and 30minutes after anesthesia. The total incidence of adverse reactions was lower in the observation group compared to the control group. Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block using the suprapopliteal approach in patients with ankle fractures can help stabilize muscle strength and hemodynamics, alleviate pain symptoms, and avoid motor block and adverse reactions. This approach is recommended for adoption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
期刊最新文献
The effect of sciatic nerve block on sciatic nerve depth and pain level in patients with ankle fracture based on different approaches under ultrasound guidance. Radiographic Soft Tissue Thickness is not a Risk Factor for Infection after Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Crossed Screws Versus Plating Supplemented with an Interfragmentary Screw in First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Rescue of Interfragmentary Compression in Screw Stripping Failures: The Efficacy of NiTiNOL. Risk Factors for Postoperative Infection in Patients After Pilon Fracture Fixation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1