Mixed discipline 'Simulation Integrating Mental and Physical health Learning' (SMIPL): A qualitative study of student experience and learning

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106579
Roupmatee Joggyah, Lucy Tyler
{"title":"Mixed discipline 'Simulation Integrating Mental and Physical health Learning' (SMIPL): A qualitative study of student experience and learning","authors":"Roupmatee Joggyah,&nbsp;Lucy Tyler","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/problems</h3><div>Individuals with comorbid physical and mental health conditions face significant threats to their well-being while placing a substantial burden on healthcare systems through increased service costs. Nursing professionals encounter multiple challenges in delivering effective care to this population. These challenges include a lack of integrated care models, communication barriers among providers, the complexity of addressing dual health needs, insufficient training in comorbidity management, resource and time constraints, and pervasive stigma toward mental illness.</div><div>These factors leave many nurses, in particular, report feeling ill-prepared to provide integrated care for individuals with such complex conditions. Comorbid physical and mental health problems pose significant risks to individuals and incur additional costs to healthcare services.</div><div>Addressing these barriers calls for enhanced training programs, stronger collaboration among healthcare professionals, and the adoption of integrated care approaches. Simulation-based approaches have emerged as a potential solution to address some of these challenges, offering a way to enhance healthcare providers' knowledge and confidence in managing comorbidities.</div></div><div><h3>Aim/objective</h3><div>To 1) explore the experiences of students learning together in a mixed specialty high-fidelity simulation developed to increase knowledge and confidence in providing care for people with comorbidities and 2) understand what aspects of the simulation facilitated and hindered their engagement and learning.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>This study employed an illuminative evaluation, a qualitative research approach designed to provide a deeper understanding of how learning occurs in specific educational contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using focus groups to gather data. Eighteen undergraduate students from mental health and adult nursing programs participated in a novel, integrated simulation-based learning experience designed to simulate real-world healthcare challenges. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure diverse perspectives. The focus groups were semi-structured, with sessions lasting approximately 60 min, and discussions were analysed using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nursing students from both disciplines reported an increase in knowledge, confidence and assessment skills. Peer learning through observation and discussion, alongside the interdisciplinary working that was encouraged during the simulation session, was highly valued. Students spoke about the key features of the simulation, such as group size and authenticity, that had supported and hindered their engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Collaborative learning between nursing specialisms about comorbid health conditions effectively aligns student experience and teaching methods with their learning outcomes. Educators might consider the potential of this approach for a range of complex, multi-factor health conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 106579"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725000140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/problems

Individuals with comorbid physical and mental health conditions face significant threats to their well-being while placing a substantial burden on healthcare systems through increased service costs. Nursing professionals encounter multiple challenges in delivering effective care to this population. These challenges include a lack of integrated care models, communication barriers among providers, the complexity of addressing dual health needs, insufficient training in comorbidity management, resource and time constraints, and pervasive stigma toward mental illness.
These factors leave many nurses, in particular, report feeling ill-prepared to provide integrated care for individuals with such complex conditions. Comorbid physical and mental health problems pose significant risks to individuals and incur additional costs to healthcare services.
Addressing these barriers calls for enhanced training programs, stronger collaboration among healthcare professionals, and the adoption of integrated care approaches. Simulation-based approaches have emerged as a potential solution to address some of these challenges, offering a way to enhance healthcare providers' knowledge and confidence in managing comorbidities.

Aim/objective

To 1) explore the experiences of students learning together in a mixed specialty high-fidelity simulation developed to increase knowledge and confidence in providing care for people with comorbidities and 2) understand what aspects of the simulation facilitated and hindered their engagement and learning.

Methodology

This study employed an illuminative evaluation, a qualitative research approach designed to provide a deeper understanding of how learning occurs in specific educational contexts.

Methods

An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using focus groups to gather data. Eighteen undergraduate students from mental health and adult nursing programs participated in a novel, integrated simulation-based learning experience designed to simulate real-world healthcare challenges. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure diverse perspectives. The focus groups were semi-structured, with sessions lasting approximately 60 min, and discussions were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Nursing students from both disciplines reported an increase in knowledge, confidence and assessment skills. Peer learning through observation and discussion, alongside the interdisciplinary working that was encouraged during the simulation session, was highly valued. Students spoke about the key features of the simulation, such as group size and authenticity, that had supported and hindered their engagement.

Conclusions

Collaborative learning between nursing specialisms about comorbid health conditions effectively aligns student experience and teaching methods with their learning outcomes. Educators might consider the potential of this approach for a range of complex, multi-factor health conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合学科“模拟整合金属和身体健康学习”(SMIPL):学生体验和学习的定性研究。
背景/问题:患有身体和精神合并症的个人面临着对其福祉的重大威胁,同时通过增加服务成本给卫生保健系统带来沉重负担。护理专业人员在为这一人群提供有效护理时遇到了多重挑战。这些挑战包括缺乏综合护理模式、提供者之间的沟通障碍、解决双重卫生需求的复杂性、合并症管理方面的培训不足、资源和时间限制以及对精神疾病普遍存在的耻辱感。这些因素使许多护士,特别是报告说,感到准备不足,无法为这种复杂情况的个人提供综合护理。共病的身体和精神健康问题对个人构成重大风险,并给医疗保健服务带来额外费用。解决这些障碍需要加强培训计划,加强医疗保健专业人员之间的合作,并采用综合护理方法。基于模拟的方法已经成为解决其中一些挑战的潜在解决方案,提供了一种增强医疗保健提供者在管理合并症方面的知识和信心的方法。目的/目标:1)探索学生在混合专业高保真模拟中共同学习的经验,该模拟旨在增加学生在为患有合并症的人提供护理方面的知识和信心;2)了解模拟的哪些方面促进和阻碍了他们的参与和学习。研究方法:本研究采用了启发性评估,一种定性研究方法,旨在更深入地了解学习如何在特定的教育环境中发生。方法:采用焦点小组法进行探索性定性研究。来自心理健康和成人护理专业的18名本科生参加了一项新颖的、基于综合模拟的学习体验,旨在模拟现实世界的医疗保健挑战。参与者的抽样是有目的的,以确保不同的观点。焦点小组是半结构化的,每次会议持续约60分钟,讨论采用专题分析进行分析。结果:两个学科的护生都报告了知识、信心和评估技能的提高。通过观察和讨论的同伴学习,以及在模拟会议期间鼓励的跨学科工作,受到高度重视。学生们谈到了模拟的关键特征,如小组规模和真实性,这些特征支持和阻碍了他们的参与。结论:护理专业间关于共病健康状况的合作学习有效地将学生的经验和教学方法与他们的学习成果结合起来。教育工作者可能会考虑这种方法对一系列复杂的、多因素的健康状况的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Clinical training challenges in critical care units for nursing students: A qualitative content analysis Treatment fidelity in nursing education research: Striking a balance between rigor and real-world relevance as a contemporary challenge Thriving at work experiences among newly registered masters prepared nurses: A qualitative study Nursing students' evaluation of Primary Health Care clinical placements - A cross-sectional study Mapping strategies and outcomes of evidence-based practice training for clinical nurses: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1