Using three-zone flexible cones at the metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction may avoid the need for distal femoral replacement: The floating cone technique

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2024.12.004
Marc Ferrer-Banús, Montserrat Monfort-Mira, Marta Sabater-Martos, Laia Boadas-Gironès, Clara Chimeno-Pigrau, Juan Carlos Martínez-Pastor
{"title":"Using three-zone flexible cones at the metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction may avoid the need for distal femoral replacement: The floating cone technique","authors":"Marc Ferrer-Banús,&nbsp;Montserrat Monfort-Mira,&nbsp;Marta Sabater-Martos,&nbsp;Laia Boadas-Gironès,&nbsp;Clara Chimeno-Pigrau,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Martínez-Pastor","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Distal femoral replacement (DFR) with megaprostheses is a salvage revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) procedure indicated in cases with massive bone defects in the distal femur. As long as these implants achieve fixation only in the diaphysis, the high aseptic loosening rate reported in some series is probably related to a lack of rotational stability. Two patients with extensive distal femoral bone defects with preservation of the metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction underwent rTKA. Instead of performing a DFR with megaprostheses, partially impacted three-zone cones and standard cemented hinged implants were used with the aim of achieving better rotational stability. Both patients showed good evolution after a 12-month follow up. Clinical findings included a normal range of motion (0–100°) without any instability and preserved ability for full weight-bearing ambulation. No signs of prosthetic loosening appeared in the X-rays during follow up. To our knowledge, this was the first time a single partially anchored three-zone cone was used in massive metaphyseal femoral defects. It is an implant-dependent technique that additionally requires the preservation of the metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction, but may avoid the use of megaprostheses in some cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 154-159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024002473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distal femoral replacement (DFR) with megaprostheses is a salvage revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) procedure indicated in cases with massive bone defects in the distal femur. As long as these implants achieve fixation only in the diaphysis, the high aseptic loosening rate reported in some series is probably related to a lack of rotational stability. Two patients with extensive distal femoral bone defects with preservation of the metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction underwent rTKA. Instead of performing a DFR with megaprostheses, partially impacted three-zone cones and standard cemented hinged implants were used with the aim of achieving better rotational stability. Both patients showed good evolution after a 12-month follow up. Clinical findings included a normal range of motion (0–100°) without any instability and preserved ability for full weight-bearing ambulation. No signs of prosthetic loosening appeared in the X-rays during follow up. To our knowledge, this was the first time a single partially anchored three-zone cone was used in massive metaphyseal femoral defects. It is an implant-dependent technique that additionally requires the preservation of the metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction, but may avoid the use of megaprostheses in some cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在干骺端-干骺端连接处使用三区柔性椎体可避免股骨远端置换术:浮动椎体技术。
股骨远端置换术(DFR)与大型假体是一种挽救性翻修全膝关节置换术(rTKA)程序,适用于股骨远端大量骨缺损的病例。只要这些植入物仅在骨干内实现固定,一些系列报道的高无菌性松动率可能与旋转稳定性的缺乏有关。2例股骨远端广泛骨缺损保留干骺端-干骺端连接处的患者行rTKA。为了获得更好的旋转稳定性,使用了部分冲击的三区锥体和标准胶结铰链植入物,而不是使用大型假体进行DFR。经过12个月的随访,两例患者均表现出良好的进展。临床表现包括正常的活动范围(0-100°),无任何不稳定,并保留了完全负重行走的能力。随访期间,x光片未见假体松动迹象。据我们所知,这是第一次在股骨干骺端大面积缺损中使用单个部分锚定的三区椎体。这是一种依赖于植入物的技术,另外需要保留干骺端-干骺端连接处,但在某些情况下可以避免使用大型假体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Knee
Knee 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry; • Biomechanical studies; • Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices; • Imaging and diagnostic techniques; • Pathology; • Trauma; • Surgery; • Rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between knee and hindfoot coronal alignment in community-dwelling Japanese adults Obesity is associated with higher rates of revision following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Knee osteoarthritis classification using Optimized Granger Causality Inspired Graph Neural Network with Accelerated Model-agnostic Explanations Open surgery for isolated posterolateral corner injury with hypermobile lateral meniscus was successful at a minimum follow up of 2 years Gushu pills ameliorate interleukin-1β-induced osteoblast injury and osteoarthritis in rats via regulation of the OPG/RANKL/RANK pathway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1