Multi-diagnostic chest-worn patch to detect obstructive sleep apnea and cardiac arrhythmias.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.5664/jcsm.11522
Cathy Goldstein, Hamid Ghanbari, Surina Sharma, Nancy Collop, Zak Loring, Colleen Walsh, Brennan Torstrick, Emily Herreshoff, Mark Pollock, David S Frankel, Ilene M Rosen
{"title":"Multi-diagnostic chest-worn patch to detect obstructive sleep apnea and cardiac arrhythmias.","authors":"Cathy Goldstein, Hamid Ghanbari, Surina Sharma, Nancy Collop, Zak Loring, Colleen Walsh, Brennan Torstrick, Emily Herreshoff, Mark Pollock, David S Frankel, Ilene M Rosen","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Evaluate the performance of the SANSA device to simultaneously assess obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cardiac arrhythmias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants suspected or known to have OSA underwent polysomnography (PSG) while wearing SANSA. SANSA's algorithm was trained using 86 records and tested on 67 to evaluate training bias. SANSA performance was evaluated against ground truth PSG scored by the consensus of three technologists. PSG scoring from individual testing sites was also evaluated against consensus. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using standard apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) cutoffs. AHI and total sleep time (TST) agreement was analyzed using correlation and Bland-Altman plots. ECG was reviewed for presence of significant arrhythmias (frequent premature atrial/ventricular complexes and atrial fibrillation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SANSA's sensitivity and specificity to detect OSA ranged from 91-97% and 78-97%, respectively, across all severity levels. SANSA TST correlation with Consensus PSG TST was 0.83 with a mean difference of 3.8 minutes (limits of agreement: -91.1 to 98.7). Significant arrhythmias were detected in 32% of participants. These participants had a greater AHI (27.5 versus 15.8, P=0.003) and spent nearly twice as long at reduced oxygenation levels (47.5 versus 20.5 minutes under 88% SpO<sub>2</sub>, P = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SANSA is a promising tool for comprehensive OSA evaluation, offering the unique advantage of concurrent arrhythmia detection. This dual functionality may improve patient outcomes through early diagnosis and management of both conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11522","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Evaluate the performance of the SANSA device to simultaneously assess obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cardiac arrhythmias.

Methods: Participants suspected or known to have OSA underwent polysomnography (PSG) while wearing SANSA. SANSA's algorithm was trained using 86 records and tested on 67 to evaluate training bias. SANSA performance was evaluated against ground truth PSG scored by the consensus of three technologists. PSG scoring from individual testing sites was also evaluated against consensus. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using standard apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) cutoffs. AHI and total sleep time (TST) agreement was analyzed using correlation and Bland-Altman plots. ECG was reviewed for presence of significant arrhythmias (frequent premature atrial/ventricular complexes and atrial fibrillation).

Results: SANSA's sensitivity and specificity to detect OSA ranged from 91-97% and 78-97%, respectively, across all severity levels. SANSA TST correlation with Consensus PSG TST was 0.83 with a mean difference of 3.8 minutes (limits of agreement: -91.1 to 98.7). Significant arrhythmias were detected in 32% of participants. These participants had a greater AHI (27.5 versus 15.8, P=0.003) and spent nearly twice as long at reduced oxygenation levels (47.5 versus 20.5 minutes under 88% SpO2, P = 0.009).

Conclusions: SANSA is a promising tool for comprehensive OSA evaluation, offering the unique advantage of concurrent arrhythmia detection. This dual functionality may improve patient outcomes through early diagnosis and management of both conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.
期刊最新文献
Effort/reward imbalance and comorbidities burden in academic and professional careers of patients with narcolepsy type 1. Measuring hypoglossal nerve stimulator outcomes. Polysomnography phenotype of CANVAS with Parkinsonism. Enhancing the robustness and clarity of future Mendelian randomization studies in sleep medicine. Confirmatory evidence for circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorder by positive airway pressure therapy adherence data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1