A novel clinical investigation using deep learning and human-in-the-loop approach in orbital volume measurement

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2025.01.007
Yong June Chang , Jungrae Cho , Byungeun Shon , Kang Young Choi , Sungmoon Jeong , Jeong Yeop Ryu
{"title":"A novel clinical investigation using deep learning and human-in-the-loop approach in orbital volume measurement","authors":"Yong June Chang ,&nbsp;Jungrae Cho ,&nbsp;Byungeun Shon ,&nbsp;Kang Young Choi ,&nbsp;Sungmoon Jeong ,&nbsp;Jeong Yeop Ryu","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Orbital volume assessment is crucial for surgical planning. Traditional methods lack efficiency and accuracy. Recent studies explore AI-driven techniques, but research on their clinical effectiveness is limited.</div><div>This study included 349 patients aged 19 years and above, who underwent three-dimensional facial computed tomography (3DCT) without orbital trauma or congenital anomalies. To construct an AI training dataset, manual segmentation was performed on 178 patients’ 3DCT using 3D Slicer. The remaining data of 171 patients underwent human-in-the-loop method, resulting in a dataset of 349 annotated samples. Comparative analysis of Dice coefficients and execution speeds was performed between manual and semi-automated segmentations.</div><div>Comparing AI-assisted semi-automated segmentation with manual segmentation, all six annotators demonstrated lower average inference times without a significant difference in Dice coefficients (90.31% vs. 88.72%). For 178 patients’ 3DCT, a high average Dice coefficient of 89.9% was observed, and a 38.42-ms inference time was recorded. For the full dataset, the AI model achieved a high average Dice coefficient of 94.1% and a fast average inference time of 32.55 ms per axial slice.</div><div>This study demonstrates the potential of AI for maintaining high accuracy and time-efficiency in orbital region segmentation, with wide clinical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"53 5","pages":"Pages 498-506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518225000186","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orbital volume assessment is crucial for surgical planning. Traditional methods lack efficiency and accuracy. Recent studies explore AI-driven techniques, but research on their clinical effectiveness is limited.
This study included 349 patients aged 19 years and above, who underwent three-dimensional facial computed tomography (3DCT) without orbital trauma or congenital anomalies. To construct an AI training dataset, manual segmentation was performed on 178 patients’ 3DCT using 3D Slicer. The remaining data of 171 patients underwent human-in-the-loop method, resulting in a dataset of 349 annotated samples. Comparative analysis of Dice coefficients and execution speeds was performed between manual and semi-automated segmentations.
Comparing AI-assisted semi-automated segmentation with manual segmentation, all six annotators demonstrated lower average inference times without a significant difference in Dice coefficients (90.31% vs. 88.72%). For 178 patients’ 3DCT, a high average Dice coefficient of 89.9% was observed, and a 38.42-ms inference time was recorded. For the full dataset, the AI model achieved a high average Dice coefficient of 94.1% and a fast average inference time of 32.55 ms per axial slice.
This study demonstrates the potential of AI for maintaining high accuracy and time-efficiency in orbital region segmentation, with wide clinical applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用深度学习和人在环方法测量眼眶体积的一项新的临床研究。
眼眶体积评估对手术计划至关重要。传统方法缺乏效率和准确性。最近的研究探索了人工智能驱动的技术,但对其临床效果的研究有限。本研究纳入349例年龄在19岁及以上的患者,均行三维面部计算机断层扫描(3DCT),无眶外伤或先天性异常。为了构建人工智能训练数据集,使用3D Slicer对178例患者的3DCT进行人工分割。171例患者的剩余数据采用human-in-the-loop方法,得到349个注释样本的数据集。对手工和半自动分割的Dice系数和执行速度进行了比较分析。将人工智能辅助的半自动分割与人工分割进行比较,所有六种注释器的平均推理时间都较低,Dice系数差异不显著(90.31% vs. 88.72%)。178例患者3DCT的平均Dice系数高达89.9%,推断时间为38.42 ms。对于完整数据集,AI模型实现了94.1%的平均Dice系数和32.55 ms /轴向切片的快速平均推理时间。该研究证明了人工智能在眼眶区域分割中保持高精度和高效率的潜力,具有广泛的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
期刊最新文献
Morphological changes in the nasal base formation after secondary alveolar bone grafting for patients with alveolar clefts Advancing surgical cutting guide flexibility: A hybrid physical and Augmented Reality solution for cranio-maxillofacial surgery Concentrated growth factor as treatment for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled clinical trial Clinical, technical, and economic outcomes of 3D-printed bone substitutes in maxillofacial reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis MRI characteristics of the lateral pterygoid muscle and correlation with temporomandibular disorder severity: a multimodal quantitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1