Portable Video Otoscope for Intra-Tympanic Dexamethasone in ISSNHL Treatment: A Promising Method.

Ruru Tian, Jinv Ding, Jianhua Jiang
{"title":"Portable Video Otoscope for Intra-Tympanic Dexamethasone in ISSNHL Treatment: A Promising Method.","authors":"Ruru Tian, Jinv Ding, Jianhua Jiang","doi":"10.1177/01455613251313916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of portable ear endoscopic tympanic injection versus conventional ear endoscopic tympanic injection in the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method. <b>Methods:</b> Clinical data of 128 patients with ISSNHL who did not respond to conventional treatment were collected from January 2019 to June 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (n = 60) received portable ear endoscopic tympanic injection, while Group 2 (n = 68) received conventional ear endoscopic tympanic injection. The hearing improvement and total effective rate were compared between the 2 groups. <b>Results:</b> Both groups showed significant hearing improvement after treatment (<i>P</i> < .001). The total effective rate of the portable ear endoscopy group was higher than that of the conventional endoscopy group (71.67% vs 50.00%, <i>P</i> = .012). However, there was no significant difference in treatment effect between the 2 groups for patients with different degrees of hearing impairment. <b>Conclusion:</b> Both methods demonstrated efficacy in treating ISSNHL with dexamethasone tympanic injection. Portable ear endoscopy offers advantages such as convenience, high patient compliance, and potentially higher efficacy. It is beneficial for teaching and suitable for beginners, and its clinical application can be promoted.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613251313916"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251313916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of portable ear endoscopic tympanic injection versus conventional ear endoscopic tympanic injection in the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Methods: Clinical data of 128 patients with ISSNHL who did not respond to conventional treatment were collected from January 2019 to June 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (n = 60) received portable ear endoscopic tympanic injection, while Group 2 (n = 68) received conventional ear endoscopic tympanic injection. The hearing improvement and total effective rate were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Both groups showed significant hearing improvement after treatment (P < .001). The total effective rate of the portable ear endoscopy group was higher than that of the conventional endoscopy group (71.67% vs 50.00%, P = .012). However, there was no significant difference in treatment effect between the 2 groups for patients with different degrees of hearing impairment. Conclusion: Both methods demonstrated efficacy in treating ISSNHL with dexamethasone tympanic injection. Portable ear endoscopy offers advantages such as convenience, high patient compliance, and potentially higher efficacy. It is beneficial for teaching and suitable for beginners, and its clinical application can be promoted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
便携式视频耳镜应用鼓室内地塞米松治疗ISSNHL:一种有前途的方法。
目的:本回顾性研究旨在比较便携式耳内窥镜鼓膜注射与常规耳内窥镜鼓膜注射治疗特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失(ISSNHL)的疗效,并探讨每种方法的优缺点。方法:收集2019年1月至2023年6月128例常规治疗无效的ISSNHL患者的临床资料。将患者分为2组:1组(60例)接受便携式耳廓内窥镜鼓室注射,2组(68例)接受常规耳廓内窥镜鼓室注射。比较两组患者的听力改善情况及总有效率。结果:两组治疗后听力均有明显改善(P < 0.001)。便携式耳内镜组总有效率高于常规内镜组(71.67% vs 50.00%, P = 0.012)。然而,对于不同程度的听力障碍患者,两组间的治疗效果无显著差异。结论:两种方法联合地塞米松鼓室注射液治疗ISSNHL疗效显著。便携式耳内窥镜检查具有方便、患者依从性高、潜在的更高疗效等优点。有利于教学,适合初学者使用,可促进临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Sinonasal Cavity: A Key CT Sign and the Importance of Oncologic History. Embedded AI-Assisted Otoscopic Image Screening for Pediatric Otitis Media. Angioleiomyoma of the Nasal Tip. Neural Network Machine Learning for Determining Surgical Appropriateness in Head and Neck Subspecialty Referrals. In-Office Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Secondary to Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis of the Nasopharynx: A Novel Approach to a Rare Condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1