{"title":"Portable Video Otoscope for Intra-Tympanic Dexamethasone in ISSNHL Treatment: A Promising Method.","authors":"Ruru Tian, Jinv Ding, Jianhua Jiang","doi":"10.1177/01455613251313916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of portable ear endoscopic tympanic injection versus conventional ear endoscopic tympanic injection in the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method. <b>Methods:</b> Clinical data of 128 patients with ISSNHL who did not respond to conventional treatment were collected from January 2019 to June 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (n = 60) received portable ear endoscopic tympanic injection, while Group 2 (n = 68) received conventional ear endoscopic tympanic injection. The hearing improvement and total effective rate were compared between the 2 groups. <b>Results:</b> Both groups showed significant hearing improvement after treatment (<i>P</i> < .001). The total effective rate of the portable ear endoscopy group was higher than that of the conventional endoscopy group (71.67% vs 50.00%, <i>P</i> = .012). However, there was no significant difference in treatment effect between the 2 groups for patients with different degrees of hearing impairment. <b>Conclusion:</b> Both methods demonstrated efficacy in treating ISSNHL with dexamethasone tympanic injection. Portable ear endoscopy offers advantages such as convenience, high patient compliance, and potentially higher efficacy. It is beneficial for teaching and suitable for beginners, and its clinical application can be promoted.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613251313916"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251313916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of portable ear endoscopic tympanic injection versus conventional ear endoscopic tympanic injection in the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Methods: Clinical data of 128 patients with ISSNHL who did not respond to conventional treatment were collected from January 2019 to June 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (n = 60) received portable ear endoscopic tympanic injection, while Group 2 (n = 68) received conventional ear endoscopic tympanic injection. The hearing improvement and total effective rate were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Both groups showed significant hearing improvement after treatment (P < .001). The total effective rate of the portable ear endoscopy group was higher than that of the conventional endoscopy group (71.67% vs 50.00%, P = .012). However, there was no significant difference in treatment effect between the 2 groups for patients with different degrees of hearing impairment. Conclusion: Both methods demonstrated efficacy in treating ISSNHL with dexamethasone tympanic injection. Portable ear endoscopy offers advantages such as convenience, high patient compliance, and potentially higher efficacy. It is beneficial for teaching and suitable for beginners, and its clinical application can be promoted.
目的:本回顾性研究旨在比较便携式耳内窥镜鼓膜注射与常规耳内窥镜鼓膜注射治疗特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失(ISSNHL)的疗效,并探讨每种方法的优缺点。方法:收集2019年1月至2023年6月128例常规治疗无效的ISSNHL患者的临床资料。将患者分为2组:1组(60例)接受便携式耳廓内窥镜鼓室注射,2组(68例)接受常规耳廓内窥镜鼓室注射。比较两组患者的听力改善情况及总有效率。结果:两组治疗后听力均有明显改善(P < 0.001)。便携式耳内镜组总有效率高于常规内镜组(71.67% vs 50.00%, P = 0.012)。然而,对于不同程度的听力障碍患者,两组间的治疗效果无显著差异。结论:两种方法联合地塞米松鼓室注射液治疗ISSNHL疗效显著。便携式耳内窥镜检查具有方便、患者依从性高、潜在的更高疗效等优点。有利于教学,适合初学者使用,可促进临床应用。