Impact of the lung allocation system score modification by blood type on US lung transplant candidates.

IF 8.9 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.034
Grace R Lyden, Maryam Valapour, Nicholas L Wood, Sommer E Gentry, Ajay K Israni, Ryutaro Hirose, Jon J Snyder
{"title":"Impact of the lung allocation system score modification by blood type on US lung transplant candidates.","authors":"Grace R Lyden, Maryam Valapour, Nicholas L Wood, Sommer E Gentry, Ajay K Israni, Ryutaro Hirose, Jon J Snyder","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lung continuous distribution system was modified on September 27, 2023, with the goal of increasing transplant access for blood type O candidates after an error was discovered in the simulation used to support the development of the initial allocation policy. This retrospective observational study compares national waitlist outcomes (transplant rate, waitlist mortality) under continuous distribution before (March 10, 2023, through September 26, 2023; premodification) and after (September 27, 2023, through April 14, 2024; postmodification) the blood type score modification. We fit adjusted Poisson regression models of the transplant rate and mortality rate. The transplant rate was lowest for type O candidates in both eras, but significantly increased after the score modification, from a premodification adjusted rate ratio (95% CI) of 0.40 (0.36, 0.45) to postmodification 0.52 (0.45, 0.59), relative to premodification type A candidates. The adjusted mortality incidence (95% CI) decreased in type O candidates from 3.6% (3.0%, 4.3%) premodification to 3.2% (2.6%, 3.8%) postmodification. In an exploratory analysis, we estimated there would have been the same number of waitlist deaths (approximately 105) if the modified score had been adopted at the start of continuous distribution; however, transplants would have shifted toward type O candidates (57.8 [95% CI: 35.1, 80.9] additional transplants) and deaths would have shifted away from type O candidates (4.6 [95% CI: 2.7, 6.8] fewer deaths).</p>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lung continuous distribution system was modified on September 27, 2023, with the goal of increasing transplant access for blood type O candidates after an error was discovered in the simulation used to support the development of the initial allocation policy. This retrospective observational study compares national waitlist outcomes (transplant rate, waitlist mortality) under continuous distribution before (March 10, 2023, through September 26, 2023; premodification) and after (September 27, 2023, through April 14, 2024; postmodification) the blood type score modification. We fit adjusted Poisson regression models of the transplant rate and mortality rate. The transplant rate was lowest for type O candidates in both eras, but significantly increased after the score modification, from a premodification adjusted rate ratio (95% CI) of 0.40 (0.36, 0.45) to postmodification 0.52 (0.45, 0.59), relative to premodification type A candidates. The adjusted mortality incidence (95% CI) decreased in type O candidates from 3.6% (3.0%, 4.3%) premodification to 3.2% (2.6%, 3.8%) postmodification. In an exploratory analysis, we estimated there would have been the same number of waitlist deaths (approximately 105) if the modified score had been adopted at the start of continuous distribution; however, transplants would have shifted toward type O candidates (57.8 [95% CI: 35.1, 80.9] additional transplants) and deaths would have shifted away from type O candidates (4.6 [95% CI: 2.7, 6.8] fewer deaths).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.
期刊最新文献
Outside Front Cover Association between out of sequence allocation and deceased donor kidney non-utilization across Organ Procurement Organizations. Longer Travel and Traffic are Associated with Adult Liver Transplant Waitlist Mortality in the United States. Breaking Barriers: Successful Outcomes of HCV D+/R- Transplants in HIV+ Recipients. Changes to MMWR: Implications for PHD and the transplant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1