Grace R Lyden, Maryam Valapour, Nicholas L Wood, Sommer E Gentry, Ajay K Israni, Ryutaro Hirose, Jon J Snyder
{"title":"Impact of the lung allocation system score modification by blood type on US lung transplant candidates.","authors":"Grace R Lyden, Maryam Valapour, Nicholas L Wood, Sommer E Gentry, Ajay K Israni, Ryutaro Hirose, Jon J Snyder","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lung continuous distribution system was modified on September 27, 2023, with the goal of increasing transplant access for blood type O candidates after an error was discovered in the simulation used to support the development of the initial allocation policy. This retrospective observational study compares national waitlist outcomes (transplant rate, waitlist mortality) under continuous distribution before (March 10, 2023, through September 26, 2023; premodification) and after (September 27, 2023, through April 14, 2024; postmodification) the blood type score modification. We fit adjusted Poisson regression models of the transplant rate and mortality rate. The transplant rate was lowest for type O candidates in both eras, but significantly increased after the score modification, from a premodification adjusted rate ratio (95% CI) of 0.40 (0.36, 0.45) to postmodification 0.52 (0.45, 0.59), relative to premodification type A candidates. The adjusted mortality incidence (95% CI) decreased in type O candidates from 3.6% (3.0%, 4.3%) premodification to 3.2% (2.6%, 3.8%) postmodification. In an exploratory analysis, we estimated there would have been the same number of waitlist deaths (approximately 105) if the modified score had been adopted at the start of continuous distribution; however, transplants would have shifted toward type O candidates (57.8 [95% CI: 35.1, 80.9] additional transplants) and deaths would have shifted away from type O candidates (4.6 [95% CI: 2.7, 6.8] fewer deaths).</p>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The lung continuous distribution system was modified on September 27, 2023, with the goal of increasing transplant access for blood type O candidates after an error was discovered in the simulation used to support the development of the initial allocation policy. This retrospective observational study compares national waitlist outcomes (transplant rate, waitlist mortality) under continuous distribution before (March 10, 2023, through September 26, 2023; premodification) and after (September 27, 2023, through April 14, 2024; postmodification) the blood type score modification. We fit adjusted Poisson regression models of the transplant rate and mortality rate. The transplant rate was lowest for type O candidates in both eras, but significantly increased after the score modification, from a premodification adjusted rate ratio (95% CI) of 0.40 (0.36, 0.45) to postmodification 0.52 (0.45, 0.59), relative to premodification type A candidates. The adjusted mortality incidence (95% CI) decreased in type O candidates from 3.6% (3.0%, 4.3%) premodification to 3.2% (2.6%, 3.8%) postmodification. In an exploratory analysis, we estimated there would have been the same number of waitlist deaths (approximately 105) if the modified score had been adopted at the start of continuous distribution; however, transplants would have shifted toward type O candidates (57.8 [95% CI: 35.1, 80.9] additional transplants) and deaths would have shifted away from type O candidates (4.6 [95% CI: 2.7, 6.8] fewer deaths).
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide.
The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.