Effectiveness and Safety in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Who Switched from Warfarin to Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Medicare Population

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s12325-024-03099-y
Nipun Atreja, Anandkumar Dubey, Amiee Kang, Jenny Jiang, Melissa Hagan, Abimbola Michael-Asalu, Dong Cheng, Steven Deitelzweig
{"title":"Effectiveness and Safety in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Who Switched from Warfarin to Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Medicare Population","authors":"Nipun Atreja,&nbsp;Anandkumar Dubey,&nbsp;Amiee Kang,&nbsp;Jenny Jiang,&nbsp;Melissa Hagan,&nbsp;Abimbola Michael-Asalu,&nbsp;Dong Cheng,&nbsp;Steven Deitelzweig","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03099-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF), a common heart rhythm abnormality, is linked to a higher risk of stroke. Traditionally, warfarin has been the primary anticoagulation treatment for reducing the stroke risk. The new standard of treatment by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offers greater benefits including improved efficacy and fewer adverse effects with reduced monitoring. This study aims to evaluate the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among patients with AF who switched from warfarin to DOACs.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study utilized Medicare data to conduct a retrospective analysis of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who switched from warfarin to DOACs between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019. Patients with NVAF aged 65 and older who switched from warfarin and had continuous health plan enrollment were included. Descriptive statistics, propensity score matching (PSM), and Cox proportional hazard (PH) models were utilized to compare the outcomes and assess risks of SE and MB across the DOAC cohorts.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1,843,495 patients with NVAF on warfarin, 171,700 switched to DOACs within 90 days of discontinuation (apixaban: 90,850; rivaroxaban: 67,698; dabigatran: 12,900). The mean follow-up period across DOAC cohorts ranged from 552 to 628 days. After PSM, apixaban showed significantly lower rates of stroke/SE compared to dabigatran (2.99% vs. 3.98%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and rivaroxaban (3.08% vs. 3.80%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). MB rates were also lower with apixaban versus dabigatran (4.29% vs. 5.57%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and rivaroxaban (4.07% vs. 6.35%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Cox PH models confirmed these findings, with apixaban demonstrating lower risks of stroke/SE [hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–0.96 vs. dabigatran; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85–0.96 vs. rivaroxaban] and MB (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71–0.89 vs. dabigatran; HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.65–0.72 vs. rivaroxaban).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The risk of stroke/SE and MB varies significantly among patients with NVAF switching from warfarin to different DOACs, with apixaban presenting the lowest risk compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 3","pages":"1462 - 1483"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-024-03099-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-03099-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF), a common heart rhythm abnormality, is linked to a higher risk of stroke. Traditionally, warfarin has been the primary anticoagulation treatment for reducing the stroke risk. The new standard of treatment by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offers greater benefits including improved efficacy and fewer adverse effects with reduced monitoring. This study aims to evaluate the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among patients with AF who switched from warfarin to DOACs.

Methods

This study utilized Medicare data to conduct a retrospective analysis of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who switched from warfarin to DOACs between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019. Patients with NVAF aged 65 and older who switched from warfarin and had continuous health plan enrollment were included. Descriptive statistics, propensity score matching (PSM), and Cox proportional hazard (PH) models were utilized to compare the outcomes and assess risks of SE and MB across the DOAC cohorts.

Results

Among 1,843,495 patients with NVAF on warfarin, 171,700 switched to DOACs within 90 days of discontinuation (apixaban: 90,850; rivaroxaban: 67,698; dabigatran: 12,900). The mean follow-up period across DOAC cohorts ranged from 552 to 628 days. After PSM, apixaban showed significantly lower rates of stroke/SE compared to dabigatran (2.99% vs. 3.98%, p < 0.0001) and rivaroxaban (3.08% vs. 3.80%, p < 0.0001). MB rates were also lower with apixaban versus dabigatran (4.29% vs. 5.57%, p < 0.0001) and rivaroxaban (4.07% vs. 6.35%, p < 0.0001). Cox PH models confirmed these findings, with apixaban demonstrating lower risks of stroke/SE [hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–0.96 vs. dabigatran; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85–0.96 vs. rivaroxaban] and MB (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71–0.89 vs. dabigatran; HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.65–0.72 vs. rivaroxaban).

Conclusion

The risk of stroke/SE and MB varies significantly among patients with NVAF switching from warfarin to different DOACs, with apixaban presenting the lowest risk compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非瓣膜性心房颤动患者从华法林改为直接口服抗凝剂的有效性和安全性。
心房颤动(AF)是一种常见的心律异常,与中风的高风险有关。传统上,华法林一直是降低中风风险的主要抗凝治疗药物。直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)治疗的新标准提供了更大的好处,包括改善疗效和减少不良反应,减少了监测。本研究旨在评估从华法林切换到DOACs的房颤患者卒中/全身栓塞(SE)和大出血(MB)的风险。方法:本研究利用Medicare数据对2012年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间从华法林改用doac的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者进行回顾性分析。年龄在65岁及以上的非瓣膜性房颤患者从华法林切换到持续的健康计划登记。使用描述性统计、倾向评分匹配(PSM)和Cox比例风险(PH)模型来比较DOAC队列的结果并评估SE和MB的风险。结果:在接受华法林治疗的1,843,495例非瓣膜性房颤患者中,171,700例在停药90天内改用doac(阿哌沙班:90,850;rivaroxaban: 67698;dabigatran: 12900)。DOAC队列的平均随访期为552至628天。PSM后,阿哌沙班的卒中/SE发生率明显低于达比加群(2.99% vs. 3.98%), p结论:从华法林切换到不同doac的非瓣膜性房颤患者卒中/SE和MB的风险差异显著,阿哌沙班与达比加群和利伐沙班相比风险最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
The Critical Role of Oxygen Supplementation in Epithelium-On Corneal Cross-Linking: A Narrative Review. Overcoming Hyperkalaemia as a Barrier to Achieving Optimal RAASi Therapy and Cardiorenal Protection in Individuals with Cardiorenal Disease: A Podcast Discussion. Cognitive Decline and Illness Progression in Bipolar Disorder. Impact of Home-Based Respiratory Physiotherapy in Nusinersen-Treated Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Joint Assessment Matters: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Benefits of Interdisciplinary Psoriasis Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1