Effect of Social Restriction Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Activity of Daily Living and Disease Severity of Patients With Alzheimer Disease: Sub-analysis of a Double-blinded Noninferiority Study of Donepezil Patches and Donepezil Tablets.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1097/WAD.0000000000000657
Yu Nakamura, Takumi Omori, Kenichi Nishiyama, Ichiro Ishikawa, Hiroshi Aoki, Naoki Nagakura
{"title":"Effect of Social Restriction Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Activity of Daily Living and Disease Severity of Patients With Alzheimer Disease: Sub-analysis of a Double-blinded Noninferiority Study of Donepezil Patches and Donepezil Tablets.","authors":"Yu Nakamura, Takumi Omori, Kenichi Nishiyama, Ichiro Ishikawa, Hiroshi Aoki, Naoki Nagakura","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously reported that social restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decline in cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Here, we assessed the effects of COVID-19 restrictions on the activities of daily living (ADL) and disease severity in patients by comparing them to a control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the impact on ADL, evaluated using disability assessment for dementia (DAD), and disease severity, evaluated using the ABC dementia scale, in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis of a double-blinded, noninferiority study of donepezil 27.5 mg patches and donepezil hydrochloride 5 mg tablets (JapicCTI-194582). After showing the noninferiority of both treatments, we combined the data from both groups for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subpopulation of the per-protocol set grouped by completing the double-blinded evaluation before and on/after the mild lockdown was balanced (n=136 and n=120). Patient demographics were similar between the subgroups. The decline in the DAD and ABC dementia scale scores [least-squares mean (SE)] was ameliorated by social restriction [-3.810 (0.743) and -1.871 (0.697) and -1.147 (0.285) and -0.419 (0.267), respectively (not significant)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Normalcy and expectation biases can affect the evaluation of ADL and disease severity by caregivers under high stress and deterioration of mental conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7679,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We previously reported that social restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decline in cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Here, we assessed the effects of COVID-19 restrictions on the activities of daily living (ADL) and disease severity in patients by comparing them to a control group.

Methods: We examined the impact on ADL, evaluated using disability assessment for dementia (DAD), and disease severity, evaluated using the ABC dementia scale, in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis of a double-blinded, noninferiority study of donepezil 27.5 mg patches and donepezil hydrochloride 5 mg tablets (JapicCTI-194582). After showing the noninferiority of both treatments, we combined the data from both groups for analysis.

Results: The subpopulation of the per-protocol set grouped by completing the double-blinded evaluation before and on/after the mild lockdown was balanced (n=136 and n=120). Patient demographics were similar between the subgroups. The decline in the DAD and ABC dementia scale scores [least-squares mean (SE)] was ameliorated by social restriction [-3.810 (0.743) and -1.871 (0.697) and -1.147 (0.285) and -0.419 (0.267), respectively (not significant)].

Conclusion: Normalcy and expectation biases can affect the evaluation of ADL and disease severity by caregivers under high stress and deterioration of mental conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: ​Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of clinicians and researchers, with primary emphasis on Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The journal publishes original articles emphasizing research in humans including epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and experimental studies, studies of diagnosis and biomarkers, as well as research on the health of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The scientific portion of the journal is augmented by reviews of the current literature, concepts, conjectures, and hypotheses in dementia, brief reports, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Social Restriction Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Activity of Daily Living and Disease Severity of Patients With Alzheimer Disease: Sub-analysis of a Double-blinded Noninferiority Study of Donepezil Patches and Donepezil Tablets. Survival of Patients at a Neurology Clinic: No Improvement Over 12 Years. Refractory Psychosis as a Red Flag for End of Life in Individuals With Dementia With Lewy Bodies: A Case Series and Re-analysis of Prior Qualitative Data. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Virtual "Dementia Awareness for Caregivers" Course in Brazil and India. Can Sleep Predict Conversion to Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia? Results From the Hellenic Longitudinal Investigation of Aging and Diet Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1