Validation of the PANAMA-Score for Survival and Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006650
Ingmar F Rompen, Thomas F Stoop, Stijn van Roessel, Eran van Veldhuisen, Quisette P Janssen, Adnan Alseidi, Alberto Balduzzi, Gianpaolo Balzano, Frederik Berrevoet, Morgan Bonds, Olivier R Busch, Giovanni Butturini, Ammar A Javed, Marco Del Chiaro, Kevin C Conlon, Massimo Falconi, Isabella Frigerio, Giuseppe K Fusai, Johan Gagnière, Oonagh Griffin, Thilo Hackert, Ernesto Sparrelid, Asif Halimi, Knut J Labori, Giuseppe Malleo, Marco V Marino, Michael B Mortensen, Andrej Nikov, Mickaël Lesurtel, Tobias Keck, Jörg Kleeff, Rupaly Pandé, Per Pfeiffer, Daniel Pietrasz, Keith J Roberts, Antonio Sa Cunha, Roberto Salvia, Oliver Strobel, Timo Tarvainen, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Martin Loos, Christoph Michalski, Marc G Besselink, Thomas Hank
{"title":"Validation of the PANAMA-Score for Survival and Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX.","authors":"Ingmar F Rompen, Thomas F Stoop, Stijn van Roessel, Eran van Veldhuisen, Quisette P Janssen, Adnan Alseidi, Alberto Balduzzi, Gianpaolo Balzano, Frederik Berrevoet, Morgan Bonds, Olivier R Busch, Giovanni Butturini, Ammar A Javed, Marco Del Chiaro, Kevin C Conlon, Massimo Falconi, Isabella Frigerio, Giuseppe K Fusai, Johan Gagnière, Oonagh Griffin, Thilo Hackert, Ernesto Sparrelid, Asif Halimi, Knut J Labori, Giuseppe Malleo, Marco V Marino, Michael B Mortensen, Andrej Nikov, Mickaël Lesurtel, Tobias Keck, Jörg Kleeff, Rupaly Pandé, Per Pfeiffer, Daniel Pietrasz, Keith J Roberts, Antonio Sa Cunha, Roberto Salvia, Oliver Strobel, Timo Tarvainen, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Martin Loos, Christoph Michalski, Marc G Besselink, Thomas Hank","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To validate the prognostic value of the PAncreatic NeoAdjuvant MAssachusetts (PANAMA)-score and to determine its predictive ability for survival benefit derived from adjuvant treatment in patients after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The PANAMA-score was developed to guide prognostication in patients after neoadjuvant therapy and resection for PDAC. As this score focuses on the risk for residual disease after resection, it might also be able to select patients who benefit from adjuvant after neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective international multicenter study is endorsed by the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA). Patients with PDAC who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were included. Mantel-Cox regression with interaction analysis was performed to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 383 patients after resection of PDAC following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were included of whom 187 (49%), 137 (36%), and 59 (15%) had a low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk PANAMA-score, respectively. A discrimination in median OS was observed stratified by risk groups (48.5, 27.6, and 22.3 months, Log-Rank-Plow-intermediate=0.004, Log-Rank-Pintermediate-high=0.027). Adjuvant therapy was not associated with an OS difference in the low-risk group (HR 1.50, 95%CI:0.92-2.50), whereas improved OS was observed in the intermediate (HR 0.58, 95%CI:0.34-0.97) and high-risk groups (HR 0.47, 95%CI:0.24-0.94) (p-interaction=0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PANAMA 3-tier risk groups (low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk, available via pancreascalculator.com) correspond with differential survival in patients with resected PDAC following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. The risk groups also differentiate between survival benefit associated with adjuvant treatment, with only the intermediate- and high-risk groups associated with improved OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006650","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To validate the prognostic value of the PAncreatic NeoAdjuvant MAssachusetts (PANAMA)-score and to determine its predictive ability for survival benefit derived from adjuvant treatment in patients after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX.

Background: The PANAMA-score was developed to guide prognostication in patients after neoadjuvant therapy and resection for PDAC. As this score focuses on the risk for residual disease after resection, it might also be able to select patients who benefit from adjuvant after neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods: This retrospective international multicenter study is endorsed by the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA). Patients with PDAC who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were included. Mantel-Cox regression with interaction analysis was performed to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results: Overall, 383 patients after resection of PDAC following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were included of whom 187 (49%), 137 (36%), and 59 (15%) had a low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk PANAMA-score, respectively. A discrimination in median OS was observed stratified by risk groups (48.5, 27.6, and 22.3 months, Log-Rank-Plow-intermediate=0.004, Log-Rank-Pintermediate-high=0.027). Adjuvant therapy was not associated with an OS difference in the low-risk group (HR 1.50, 95%CI:0.92-2.50), whereas improved OS was observed in the intermediate (HR 0.58, 95%CI:0.34-0.97) and high-risk groups (HR 0.47, 95%CI:0.24-0.94) (p-interaction=0.008).

Conclusions: The PANAMA 3-tier risk groups (low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk, available via pancreascalculator.com) correspond with differential survival in patients with resected PDAC following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. The risk groups also differentiate between survival benefit associated with adjuvant treatment, with only the intermediate- and high-risk groups associated with improved OS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
Defer, Share, or Drive the Decision: Empowering Patients with Varied Preferences to Engage in Decision-making (an Analysis from Alliance A231701CD). International Medical Graduates in Academic Cardiothoracic Surgery. Validation of the PANAMA-Score for Survival and Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Prevalence and Incidence of Oral Benzodiazepine Use in Hospitalized Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Seeing the Forest and the Trees: The Future of Robotic Surgery and the Path Forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1