Caregiver Resilience Through the First 2 Years After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.464
Daniel W. Klyce PhD , Jennifer H. Marwitz MA , Robert A. Perera PhD , Laura E. Dreer PhD , Stephanie D. Agtarap PhD , Katherine Abbasi MA , Dawn M. Neumann PhD , Flora M. Hammond MD , Thomas F. Bergquist PhD , Jean Lengenfelder PhD
{"title":"Caregiver Resilience Through the First 2 Years After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study","authors":"Daniel W. Klyce PhD ,&nbsp;Jennifer H. Marwitz MA ,&nbsp;Robert A. Perera PhD ,&nbsp;Laura E. Dreer PhD ,&nbsp;Stephanie D. Agtarap PhD ,&nbsp;Katherine Abbasi MA ,&nbsp;Dawn M. Neumann PhD ,&nbsp;Flora M. Hammond MD ,&nbsp;Thomas F. Bergquist PhD ,&nbsp;Jean Lengenfelder PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine: (1) the trajectory of caregiver resilience over 2 years after onset of a care-recipient's moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), (2) caregiver-related outcomes associated with resilience, and (3) changes in associations between caregiver resilience, other caregiver characteristics, and care-recipient variables across time.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>TBI Model System (TBIMS) centers.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>TBIMS participants (care-recipients) were approached to enroll in this study and identify a caregiver. Two hundred fifty-eight (N=258) care-recipient and caregiver dyads were enrolled.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Caregiver data included demographics, health history, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), Family Needs Questionnaire-Revised, and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD-RISC-10). All caregiver data were self-reported via phone interview or mailed surveys at 6, 12, and 24 months after injury. At all 3 timepoints, care-recipients with TBI also completed their own CD-RISC-10, PHQ-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Disability Rating Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Linear mixed-effects models indicated that the trajectory of resilience was stable within caregivers over 2 years after injury. There were significant, positive associations for all caregiver Family Needs Questionnaire-Revised subscales (all <em>P</em>&lt;.001) with care-recipient and caregiver CD-RISC-10 scores (<em>P</em>=.001), indicating that more caregiving needs endorsed as “met” corresponded with higher resilience. Caregiver PHQ-9 and ZBI scores were found to be negatively associated with resilience (both <em>P</em>&lt;.001). When all covariates were included in the multivariable model, met emotional needs was positively associated with caregiver resilience (<em>P</em>&lt;.0001). Negative associations with caregiver resilience included higher caregiver PHQ-9 scores (<em>P</em>=.001) and perceptions of caregiving burden (<em>P</em>=.003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Caregiver levels of resilience were generally stable over 2 years post-TBI. Caregivers’ resilience was positively associated with perceptions of their needs being met and negatively associated with caregiving burden and emotional distress. Further research is needed to develop and evaluate the utility and feasibility of interventions to enhance resilience, meet family needs, and improve long-term outcomes after brain injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 8","pages":"Pages 1217-1226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325004940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine: (1) the trajectory of caregiver resilience over 2 years after onset of a care-recipient's moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), (2) caregiver-related outcomes associated with resilience, and (3) changes in associations between caregiver resilience, other caregiver characteristics, and care-recipient variables across time.

Design

Prospective cohort.

Setting

TBI Model System (TBIMS) centers.

Participants

TBIMS participants (care-recipients) were approached to enroll in this study and identify a caregiver. Two hundred fifty-eight (N=258) care-recipient and caregiver dyads were enrolled.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Caregiver data included demographics, health history, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), Family Needs Questionnaire-Revised, and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD-RISC-10). All caregiver data were self-reported via phone interview or mailed surveys at 6, 12, and 24 months after injury. At all 3 timepoints, care-recipients with TBI also completed their own CD-RISC-10, PHQ-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Disability Rating Scale.

Results

Linear mixed-effects models indicated that the trajectory of resilience was stable within caregivers over 2 years after injury. There were significant, positive associations for all caregiver Family Needs Questionnaire-Revised subscales (all P<.001) with care-recipient and caregiver CD-RISC-10 scores (P=.001), indicating that more caregiving needs endorsed as “met” corresponded with higher resilience. Caregiver PHQ-9 and ZBI scores were found to be negatively associated with resilience (both P<.001). When all covariates were included in the multivariable model, met emotional needs was positively associated with caregiver resilience (P<.0001). Negative associations with caregiver resilience included higher caregiver PHQ-9 scores (P=.001) and perceptions of caregiving burden (P=.003).

Conclusions

Caregiver levels of resilience were generally stable over 2 years post-TBI. Caregivers’ resilience was positively associated with perceptions of their needs being met and negatively associated with caregiving burden and emotional distress. Further research is needed to develop and evaluate the utility and feasibility of interventions to enhance resilience, meet family needs, and improve long-term outcomes after brain injury.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性脑损伤后头两年的护理人员恢复力:创伤性脑损伤模型系统研究。
目的:研究:(1)受照护者发生中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后两年内照护者心理弹性的变化轨迹,(2)与心理弹性相关的照护者相关结果,以及(3)照护者心理弹性、其他照护者特征和受照护者变量之间随时间变化的相关性。设计:前瞻性队列。设置:TBI模型系统(tims)中心。参与者:tims参与者(护理接受者)被邀请参加本研究并确定一名护理者。258名接受照顾者和照顾者夫妇被纳入研究。主要结果测量:护理者数据包括人口统计学、健康史、患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍-7 (GAD-7)、Zarit负担访谈(ZBI)、家庭需求问卷-修订版(FNQ-R)和康纳-戴维森弹性量表10 (CD-RISC-10)。所有护理人员的数据都是在受伤后6个月、12个月和24个月通过电话采访或邮寄调查自我报告的。在所有3个时间点,TBI患者也完成了自己的CD-RISC-10、PHQ-9、GAD-7和残疾评定量表(DRS)。结果:线性混合效应模型表明,护理人员在受伤后两年内恢复力的轨迹是稳定的。所有护理人员的FNQ-R分量表均存在显著的正相关(结论:护理人员的弹性水平在创伤后两年内总体稳定。照顾者的恢复力与他们的需求得到满足的感知呈正相关,与照顾负担和情绪困扰呈负相关。需要进一步的研究来开发和评估干预措施的效用和可行性,以增强恢复力,满足家庭需求,改善脑损伤后的长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Primary Frozen Shoulder: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Personalized treatment goals in hand and wrist care: understanding the influence of baseline and target score on goal achievement. Exploring Gender Disparities in Vocational Rehabilitation: A Focus on Women with Traumatic Brain Injury. Outcome Measure Frequency in Stroke Rehabilitation Lower Extremity Randomized Controlled Trials and its Correlation with Research and Clinical Practice Recommendations. CLARITY: An Exploratory Scaffold for Educational Engagement with AI-Assisted Evidence Synthesis in Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1