Acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD-NET): a naturalistic pilot trial during the COVID-19 pandemic in a psychiatric outpatient department in Germany.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1186/s12888-025-06519-7
Elisabeth Kohls, Sabrina Baldofski, Julia Scholl, Oskar Flygare, Lina Lundström, Ursula Beyrich-Kolbus, Marc Steinbrecher, Christian Rück, Christine Rummel-Kluge
{"title":"Acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD-NET): a naturalistic pilot trial during the COVID-19 pandemic in a psychiatric outpatient department in Germany.","authors":"Elisabeth Kohls, Sabrina Baldofski, Julia Scholl, Oskar Flygare, Lina Lundström, Ursula Beyrich-Kolbus, Marc Steinbrecher, Christian Rück, Christine Rummel-Kluge","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06519-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is the gold-standard treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, access to CBT and specialized treatments is often limited. This pilot study describes the implementation of a guided Internet-Based CBT program (ICBT) for individuals seeking treatment for OCD in a psychiatric outpatient department in Leipzig, Germany, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study was to investigate the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of the ICBT program for OCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an open, naturalistic pilot trial, N = 57 patients with OCD received a 10-week ICBT program (called \"OCD-NET\"). It consisted of 10 different modules covering psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, exposure with response prevention, and overall therapist support and guidance through the program. The primary outcome was feasibility and acceptance of the OCD-NET program assessed via recruitment and retention rate, adherence and user satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were OCD symptoms at the end of treatment, assessed using the self-report Obsessive Compulsive Inventory - Revised (OCI-R) and self-rated measures of depressive symptoms, quality of life, self-efficacy, and psychological distress. Additionally, treatment credibility, working alliance, and satisfaction were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, participants completed 6.30 (SD = 3.21) modules, and n = 19 (33.9%) participants completed all 10 modules of the program. Overall, n = 45 (78.9%) were treatment completers (minimum 4 modules completed), n = 11 (19.3%) were non-completers, and n = 1 (1.8%) was a dropout. Satisfaction with the program was high, with a majority of participants indicating that they would recommend it to others (n = 56, 98.2%) and that it provided the support they needed (n = 49, 86.0%).Mixed-effect models showed a significant reduction in OCD symptoms (OCI-R), with large within-group effect sizes in both intention-to-treat (ITT) and completer analyses. In ITT analyses, the OCI-R decreased significantly with a within-group effect size of d = 1.13 (95% CI 0.88 - 1.38). At post-treatment, n = 17 (29.8%) participants showed a treatment response on the OCI-R (≥ 40% reduction). The treatment also resulted in statistically significant improvements in depressive symptoms (d = 0.90 [0.65; 1.15]) and self-efficacy (d = -0.27 [-0.53; -0.00]). No significant differences were observed in quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) or psychological distress (Mini-SCL GSI) scores between baseline and post-treatment, in either the ITT or completer analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OCD-NET program is overall highly acceptable and appears to meet patients' needs in routine care, even under pandemic constraints. ICBT with therapist guidance significantly reduces OCD and depressive symptoms in real world settings. The results also suggest that this ICBT program could be integrated into routine psychiatric outpatient treatments. However, future research should investigate how upscaling and sustainable implementation could be effectively achieved.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials register (DRKS): DRKS00021706, registration date: 15.05.2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06519-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is the gold-standard treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, access to CBT and specialized treatments is often limited. This pilot study describes the implementation of a guided Internet-Based CBT program (ICBT) for individuals seeking treatment for OCD in a psychiatric outpatient department in Leipzig, Germany, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study was to investigate the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of the ICBT program for OCD.

Methods: In an open, naturalistic pilot trial, N = 57 patients with OCD received a 10-week ICBT program (called "OCD-NET"). It consisted of 10 different modules covering psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, exposure with response prevention, and overall therapist support and guidance through the program. The primary outcome was feasibility and acceptance of the OCD-NET program assessed via recruitment and retention rate, adherence and user satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were OCD symptoms at the end of treatment, assessed using the self-report Obsessive Compulsive Inventory - Revised (OCI-R) and self-rated measures of depressive symptoms, quality of life, self-efficacy, and psychological distress. Additionally, treatment credibility, working alliance, and satisfaction were assessed.

Results: On average, participants completed 6.30 (SD = 3.21) modules, and n = 19 (33.9%) participants completed all 10 modules of the program. Overall, n = 45 (78.9%) were treatment completers (minimum 4 modules completed), n = 11 (19.3%) were non-completers, and n = 1 (1.8%) was a dropout. Satisfaction with the program was high, with a majority of participants indicating that they would recommend it to others (n = 56, 98.2%) and that it provided the support they needed (n = 49, 86.0%).Mixed-effect models showed a significant reduction in OCD symptoms (OCI-R), with large within-group effect sizes in both intention-to-treat (ITT) and completer analyses. In ITT analyses, the OCI-R decreased significantly with a within-group effect size of d = 1.13 (95% CI 0.88 - 1.38). At post-treatment, n = 17 (29.8%) participants showed a treatment response on the OCI-R (≥ 40% reduction). The treatment also resulted in statistically significant improvements in depressive symptoms (d = 0.90 [0.65; 1.15]) and self-efficacy (d = -0.27 [-0.53; -0.00]). No significant differences were observed in quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) or psychological distress (Mini-SCL GSI) scores between baseline and post-treatment, in either the ITT or completer analyses.

Conclusions: The OCD-NET program is overall highly acceptable and appears to meet patients' needs in routine care, even under pandemic constraints. ICBT with therapist guidance significantly reduces OCD and depressive symptoms in real world settings. The results also suggest that this ICBT program could be integrated into routine psychiatric outpatient treatments. However, future research should investigate how upscaling and sustainable implementation could be effectively achieved.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials register (DRKS): DRKS00021706, registration date: 15.05.2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Validation of a French version of the empowerment scale for mental health service users. Association between fragmented care and incident mood disorder in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study in South Korea. Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on resilience among adult cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interoception as a key node in the multidimensional psychological structural model of depression: a structural equation model analysis of integrating environmental, cognitive and behavioral-emotional factors. Longitudinal cross-lagged association between posttraumatic stress disorder, post-traumatic growth, and deliberate rumination among healthcare staff 2 years after the COVID-19 pandemic in Hubei Province, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1