Triaging mammography with artificial intelligence: an implementation study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s10549-025-07616-7
Sarah M Friedewald, Marcin Sieniek, Sunny Jansen, Fereshteh Mahvar, Timo Kohlberger, David Schacht, Sonya Bhole, Dipti Gupta, Shruthi Prabhakara, Scott Mayer McKinney, Stacey Caron, David Melnick, Mozziyar Etemadi, Samantha Winter, Thidanun Saensuksopa, Alejandra Maciel, Luca Speroni, Martha Sevenich, Arnav Agharwal, Rubin Zhang, Gavin Duggan, Shiro Kadowaki, Atilla P Kiraly, Jie Yang, Basil Mustafa, Yossi Matias, Greg S Corrado, Daniel Tse, Krish Eswaran, Shravya Shetty
{"title":"Triaging mammography with artificial intelligence: an implementation study.","authors":"Sarah M Friedewald, Marcin Sieniek, Sunny Jansen, Fereshteh Mahvar, Timo Kohlberger, David Schacht, Sonya Bhole, Dipti Gupta, Shruthi Prabhakara, Scott Mayer McKinney, Stacey Caron, David Melnick, Mozziyar Etemadi, Samantha Winter, Thidanun Saensuksopa, Alejandra Maciel, Luca Speroni, Martha Sevenich, Arnav Agharwal, Rubin Zhang, Gavin Duggan, Shiro Kadowaki, Atilla P Kiraly, Jie Yang, Basil Mustafa, Yossi Matias, Greg S Corrado, Daniel Tse, Krish Eswaran, Shravya Shetty","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07616-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many breast centers are unable to provide immediate results at the time of screening mammography which results in delayed patient care. Implementing artificial intelligence (AI) could identify patients who may have breast cancer and accelerate the time to diagnostic imaging and biopsy diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized, unblinded, controlled implementation study we enrolled 1000 screening participants between March 2021 and May 2022. The experimental group used an AI system to prioritize a subset of cases for same-visit radiologist evaluation, and same-visit diagnostic workup if necessary. The control group followed the standard of care. The primary operational endpoints were time to additional imaging (T<sub>A</sub>) and time to biopsy diagnosis (T<sub>B</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort included 463 experimental and 392 control participants. The one-sided Mann-Whitney U test was employed for analysis of T<sub>A</sub> and T<sub>B</sub>. In the control group, the T<sub>A</sub> was 25.6 days [95% CI 22.0-29.9] and T<sub>B</sub> was 55.9 days [95% CI 45.5-69.6]. In comparison, the experimental group's mean T<sub>A</sub> was reduced by 25% (6.4 fewer days [one-sided 95% CI > 0.3], p<0.001) and mean T<sub>B</sub> was reduced by 30% (16.8 fewer days; 95% CI > 5.1], p=0.003). The time reduction was more pronounced for AI-prioritized participants in the experimental group. All participants eventually diagnosed with breast cancer were prioritized by the AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing AI prioritization can accelerate care timelines for patients requiring additional workup, while maintaining the efficiency of delayed interpretation for most participants. Reducing diagnostic delays could contribute to improved patient adherence, decreased anxiety and addressing disparities in access to timely care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07616-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many breast centers are unable to provide immediate results at the time of screening mammography which results in delayed patient care. Implementing artificial intelligence (AI) could identify patients who may have breast cancer and accelerate the time to diagnostic imaging and biopsy diagnosis.

Methods: In this prospective randomized, unblinded, controlled implementation study we enrolled 1000 screening participants between March 2021 and May 2022. The experimental group used an AI system to prioritize a subset of cases for same-visit radiologist evaluation, and same-visit diagnostic workup if necessary. The control group followed the standard of care. The primary operational endpoints were time to additional imaging (TA) and time to biopsy diagnosis (TB).

Results: The final cohort included 463 experimental and 392 control participants. The one-sided Mann-Whitney U test was employed for analysis of TA and TB. In the control group, the TA was 25.6 days [95% CI 22.0-29.9] and TB was 55.9 days [95% CI 45.5-69.6]. In comparison, the experimental group's mean TA was reduced by 25% (6.4 fewer days [one-sided 95% CI > 0.3], p<0.001) and mean TB was reduced by 30% (16.8 fewer days; 95% CI > 5.1], p=0.003). The time reduction was more pronounced for AI-prioritized participants in the experimental group. All participants eventually diagnosed with breast cancer were prioritized by the AI.

Conclusions: Implementing AI prioritization can accelerate care timelines for patients requiring additional workup, while maintaining the efficiency of delayed interpretation for most participants. Reducing diagnostic delays could contribute to improved patient adherence, decreased anxiety and addressing disparities in access to timely care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
期刊最新文献
Preferences of patients with high-risk HR + /HER2- breast cancer for adjuvant endocrine treatment: an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis study from Germany. Radar reflectors for marking of target lymph nodes in initially node-positive patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer-a subgroup analysis of the prospective AXSANA (EUBREAST-03) trial. The regulation mechanism of perceived stress on cognitive function of patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a multiple mediation analysis. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with chemotherapy: a large-scale data analysis using the Japanese claims database. Cognitive behavioral stress management effects on cancer-related distress and neuroendocrine signaling in breast cancer: differential effects by neighborhood disadvantage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1