Sarah M Friedewald, Marcin Sieniek, Sunny Jansen, Fereshteh Mahvar, Timo Kohlberger, David Schacht, Sonya Bhole, Dipti Gupta, Shruthi Prabhakara, Scott Mayer McKinney, Stacey Caron, David Melnick, Mozziyar Etemadi, Samantha Winter, Thidanun Saensuksopa, Alejandra Maciel, Luca Speroni, Martha Sevenich, Arnav Agharwal, Rubin Zhang, Gavin Duggan, Shiro Kadowaki, Atilla P Kiraly, Jie Yang, Basil Mustafa, Yossi Matias, Greg S Corrado, Daniel Tse, Krish Eswaran, Shravya Shetty
{"title":"Triaging mammography with artificial intelligence: an implementation study.","authors":"Sarah M Friedewald, Marcin Sieniek, Sunny Jansen, Fereshteh Mahvar, Timo Kohlberger, David Schacht, Sonya Bhole, Dipti Gupta, Shruthi Prabhakara, Scott Mayer McKinney, Stacey Caron, David Melnick, Mozziyar Etemadi, Samantha Winter, Thidanun Saensuksopa, Alejandra Maciel, Luca Speroni, Martha Sevenich, Arnav Agharwal, Rubin Zhang, Gavin Duggan, Shiro Kadowaki, Atilla P Kiraly, Jie Yang, Basil Mustafa, Yossi Matias, Greg S Corrado, Daniel Tse, Krish Eswaran, Shravya Shetty","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07616-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many breast centers are unable to provide immediate results at the time of screening mammography which results in delayed patient care. Implementing artificial intelligence (AI) could identify patients who may have breast cancer and accelerate the time to diagnostic imaging and biopsy diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized, unblinded, controlled implementation study we enrolled 1000 screening participants between March 2021 and May 2022. The experimental group used an AI system to prioritize a subset of cases for same-visit radiologist evaluation, and same-visit diagnostic workup if necessary. The control group followed the standard of care. The primary operational endpoints were time to additional imaging (T<sub>A</sub>) and time to biopsy diagnosis (T<sub>B</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort included 463 experimental and 392 control participants. The one-sided Mann-Whitney U test was employed for analysis of T<sub>A</sub> and T<sub>B</sub>. In the control group, the T<sub>A</sub> was 25.6 days [95% CI 22.0-29.9] and T<sub>B</sub> was 55.9 days [95% CI 45.5-69.6]. In comparison, the experimental group's mean T<sub>A</sub> was reduced by 25% (6.4 fewer days [one-sided 95% CI > 0.3], p<0.001) and mean T<sub>B</sub> was reduced by 30% (16.8 fewer days; 95% CI > 5.1], p=0.003). The time reduction was more pronounced for AI-prioritized participants in the experimental group. All participants eventually diagnosed with breast cancer were prioritized by the AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing AI prioritization can accelerate care timelines for patients requiring additional workup, while maintaining the efficiency of delayed interpretation for most participants. Reducing diagnostic delays could contribute to improved patient adherence, decreased anxiety and addressing disparities in access to timely care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07616-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Many breast centers are unable to provide immediate results at the time of screening mammography which results in delayed patient care. Implementing artificial intelligence (AI) could identify patients who may have breast cancer and accelerate the time to diagnostic imaging and biopsy diagnosis.
Methods: In this prospective randomized, unblinded, controlled implementation study we enrolled 1000 screening participants between March 2021 and May 2022. The experimental group used an AI system to prioritize a subset of cases for same-visit radiologist evaluation, and same-visit diagnostic workup if necessary. The control group followed the standard of care. The primary operational endpoints were time to additional imaging (TA) and time to biopsy diagnosis (TB).
Results: The final cohort included 463 experimental and 392 control participants. The one-sided Mann-Whitney U test was employed for analysis of TA and TB. In the control group, the TA was 25.6 days [95% CI 22.0-29.9] and TB was 55.9 days [95% CI 45.5-69.6]. In comparison, the experimental group's mean TA was reduced by 25% (6.4 fewer days [one-sided 95% CI > 0.3], p<0.001) and mean TB was reduced by 30% (16.8 fewer days; 95% CI > 5.1], p=0.003). The time reduction was more pronounced for AI-prioritized participants in the experimental group. All participants eventually diagnosed with breast cancer were prioritized by the AI.
Conclusions: Implementing AI prioritization can accelerate care timelines for patients requiring additional workup, while maintaining the efficiency of delayed interpretation for most participants. Reducing diagnostic delays could contribute to improved patient adherence, decreased anxiety and addressing disparities in access to timely care.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.