Assessment of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors following membrane peeling in idiopathic epiretinal membrane using EIFL staging system: an optical coherence tomography angiography analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMC Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1186/s12886-025-03889-0
Juan Li, Fangyuan Cheng, Zhaohui Li, Liang Wang
{"title":"Assessment of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors following membrane peeling in idiopathic epiretinal membrane using EIFL staging system: an optical coherence tomography angiography analysis.","authors":"Juan Li, Fangyuan Cheng, Zhaohui Li, Liang Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-03889-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the associations between anatomical changes and visual outcomes after membrane peeling in eyes with different stages of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All iERM eyes were graded into four stages based on the presence of ectopic inner foveal layers (EIFL) and underwent 23-gauge vitrectomy combined with ERM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, while their fellow eyes were treated as the control group. OCTA was used to measure retinal thickness(RT), foveal avascular zone (FAZ)-related parameters and superficial and deep capillary plexus (SCP and DCP) layers using 6 × 6 mm scans before, 1 month and 3 months after surgery. In addition, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), metamorphopsia and macular features were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six subjects were included in this study. In comparison to the preoperative data, visual acuity and metamorphopsia improvement was statistically significant in four stages(P < 0.05) and the higher stage (3 and 4) achieved more pronounced improvements (P = 0.002). For higher stage, RT reduced with an increase in stage(P < 0.001), superficial and deep foveal vessel density (SFVD and DFVD) and parafoveal vessel density (PRVD) in SCP declined remarkably, FAZ area was enlarged obviously, FAZ perimeter (PERIM), foveal vessel density (FD) and PRVD in DCP increased significantly after surgery (P < 0.05). Similar to high-stage patients, those with stage 2 iERMs demonstrated a decreasing trend in central macular thickness (CMT), paraRT (parafoveal thickness), SFVD, and DFVD(P < 0.05). Nevertheless, no notable alterations were observed in other indicators. Distinct from other groups, only CMT and FD increased slightly in stage 1 iERMs (P < 0.05). Post-LogMAR BCVA and LogMAR BCVA-d (pre-LogMAR BCVA -3-month post-LogMAR BCVA) were positively correlated with preoperative stages, CMT, pre-LogMAR BCVA, SFVD, and vascular tortuosity(P < 0.05). but negatively correlated with FAZ area and DFVD (P < 0.05). Preoperative and postoperative metamorphopsia had a certain positive correlation with preoperative CMT (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to OCTA analysis, different EIFL stages of iERMs showed significantly functional and anatomic differences before and after membrane peeling. Low-stage patients have better post-op visual function, while high-stage patients benefit more from surgery. It also demonstrated EIFL staging system contribute doctors to manage iERMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03889-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the associations between anatomical changes and visual outcomes after membrane peeling in eyes with different stages of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Methods: All iERM eyes were graded into four stages based on the presence of ectopic inner foveal layers (EIFL) and underwent 23-gauge vitrectomy combined with ERM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, while their fellow eyes were treated as the control group. OCTA was used to measure retinal thickness(RT), foveal avascular zone (FAZ)-related parameters and superficial and deep capillary plexus (SCP and DCP) layers using 6 × 6 mm scans before, 1 month and 3 months after surgery. In addition, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), metamorphopsia and macular features were assessed.

Results: Forty-six subjects were included in this study. In comparison to the preoperative data, visual acuity and metamorphopsia improvement was statistically significant in four stages(P < 0.05) and the higher stage (3 and 4) achieved more pronounced improvements (P = 0.002). For higher stage, RT reduced with an increase in stage(P < 0.001), superficial and deep foveal vessel density (SFVD and DFVD) and parafoveal vessel density (PRVD) in SCP declined remarkably, FAZ area was enlarged obviously, FAZ perimeter (PERIM), foveal vessel density (FD) and PRVD in DCP increased significantly after surgery (P < 0.05). Similar to high-stage patients, those with stage 2 iERMs demonstrated a decreasing trend in central macular thickness (CMT), paraRT (parafoveal thickness), SFVD, and DFVD(P < 0.05). Nevertheless, no notable alterations were observed in other indicators. Distinct from other groups, only CMT and FD increased slightly in stage 1 iERMs (P < 0.05). Post-LogMAR BCVA and LogMAR BCVA-d (pre-LogMAR BCVA -3-month post-LogMAR BCVA) were positively correlated with preoperative stages, CMT, pre-LogMAR BCVA, SFVD, and vascular tortuosity(P < 0.05). but negatively correlated with FAZ area and DFVD (P < 0.05). Preoperative and postoperative metamorphopsia had a certain positive correlation with preoperative CMT (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: According to OCTA analysis, different EIFL stages of iERMs showed significantly functional and anatomic differences before and after membrane peeling. Low-stage patients have better post-op visual function, while high-stage patients benefit more from surgery. It also demonstrated EIFL staging system contribute doctors to manage iERMs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用EIFL分期系统评估特发性视网膜前膜剥离后的临床结果和预后因素:光学相干断层扫描血管造影分析。
背景:利用光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)评估不同阶段特发性视网膜前膜(iERM)剥膜后的解剖变化与视力结果的关系。方法:所有iERM眼根据是否存在异位内中央凹层(EIFL)分为4个阶段,并行23号玻璃体切除术联合ERM和内限制膜(ILM)剥离,其余眼作为对照组。术前、术后1个月、3个月采用OCTA测量视网膜厚度(RT)、中央凹无血管区(FAZ)相关参数及浅、深毛细血管丛(SCP、DCP)层数。此外,还评估了最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、变形和黄斑特征。结果:本研究共纳入46名受试者。结论:经OCTA分析,不同EIFL分期iERMs剥膜前后在功能和解剖上均有显著差异。低分期患者术后视力较好,而高分期患者术后受益较多。同时也证明了EIFL分期系统有助于医生管理ierm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Instillation success rates among glaucoma eyedrop products: patient survey in Japan. Panoptix versus AT Lisa: comparing stability of two trifocal intraocular lenses with different haptic designs using the iTrace system. Frosted branch angiitis associated with streptococcal infection: a case report. Coexistence of MOG-IgG-associated bilateral optic neuritis with psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis in an Asian patient: a rare case report. Morphologic assessment of photoreceptors after idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery with adaptive-optics SLO.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1