Review of Endosaccular Flow Disrupters for Wide-Neck Aneurysm Treatment.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology in Review Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1097/CRD.0000000000000869
Bluyé DeMessie, Dhrumil Vaishnav, Alireza Karandish, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Nathan Farkas, David J Altschul
{"title":"Review of Endosaccular Flow Disrupters for Wide-Neck Aneurysm Treatment.","authors":"Bluyé DeMessie, Dhrumil Vaishnav, Alireza Karandish, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Nathan Farkas, David J Altschul","doi":"10.1097/CRD.0000000000000869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endosaccular flow disruption has emerged as a transformative approach for treating wide-neck intracranial aneurysms, which are characterized by neck diameters exceeding 4 millimeters or dome-to-neck ratios below 2. This review examines the technical specifications and clinical outcomes of major endosaccular devices, including the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device, the Artisse embolization device, the Medina embolization device, the neck bridging device for bifurcation aneurysms, the polycarbonate urethane membrane-assisted device, the Galaxy saccular endovascular aneurysm lattice, and the Contour Neurovascular System. Analysis of pivotal trials reveals varying degrees of efficacy and safety across platforms. The WEB device demonstrated complete occlusion rates of 51.7% to 56.1% at 1 year, with adequate occlusion reaching 84.6% in the WEB Intrasaccular Therapy Study trial and sustained improvement in 76.8% of cases at 5 years. The Artisse system showed initial promise but concerning declines in adequate occlusion from 66.7% at 6 months to 57.1% at 36 months. More recent innovations such as the Galaxy SEAL device achieved complete occlusion in 76.9% of cases in preliminary studies in 1 year. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 12.9% to 17.7% of cases across devices though procedure-related mortality remained below 2%. While the WEB device has established a robust safety and efficacy profile through long-term follow-up data, newer technologies demonstrate promising early results but require extended surveillance. Current challenges focus on optimizing device sizing, improving delivery systems, and enhancing material properties to maximize occlusion rates while minimizing complications. The evolution of these technologies continues to expand treatment options for complex aneurysms previously challenging to address through conventional endovascular or surgical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9549,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endosaccular flow disruption has emerged as a transformative approach for treating wide-neck intracranial aneurysms, which are characterized by neck diameters exceeding 4 millimeters or dome-to-neck ratios below 2. This review examines the technical specifications and clinical outcomes of major endosaccular devices, including the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device, the Artisse embolization device, the Medina embolization device, the neck bridging device for bifurcation aneurysms, the polycarbonate urethane membrane-assisted device, the Galaxy saccular endovascular aneurysm lattice, and the Contour Neurovascular System. Analysis of pivotal trials reveals varying degrees of efficacy and safety across platforms. The WEB device demonstrated complete occlusion rates of 51.7% to 56.1% at 1 year, with adequate occlusion reaching 84.6% in the WEB Intrasaccular Therapy Study trial and sustained improvement in 76.8% of cases at 5 years. The Artisse system showed initial promise but concerning declines in adequate occlusion from 66.7% at 6 months to 57.1% at 36 months. More recent innovations such as the Galaxy SEAL device achieved complete occlusion in 76.9% of cases in preliminary studies in 1 year. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 12.9% to 17.7% of cases across devices though procedure-related mortality remained below 2%. While the WEB device has established a robust safety and efficacy profile through long-term follow-up data, newer technologies demonstrate promising early results but require extended surveillance. Current challenges focus on optimizing device sizing, improving delivery systems, and enhancing material properties to maximize occlusion rates while minimizing complications. The evolution of these technologies continues to expand treatment options for complex aneurysms previously challenging to address through conventional endovascular or surgical approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology in Review
Cardiology in Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Cardiology in Review is to publish reviews on topics of current interest in cardiology that will foster increased understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical course, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Articles of the highest quality are written by authorities in the field and published promptly in a readable format with visual appeal
期刊最新文献
Long Saphenous Vein Harvesting: Reviewing Various Techniques. Review of the Etiology, Diagnosis, and Therapy of Left Atrial Thrombus. New Therapy Update Aprocitentan: An Endothelin Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Systemic Hypertension. Mitral Annular Disjunction: A Scoping Review. Safety and Efficacy of Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers for Acute Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response and Comorbid Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1