Correlation of semi-quantitative analyses and visual scores in pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT imaging with pulmonary function test parameters in patients with interstitial lung diseases

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2024.106795
L. Li, L. Wang, M. Wang, C.L. Jin, S. Yang, H. Li, L.P. Fu
{"title":"Correlation of semi-quantitative analyses and visual scores in pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT imaging with pulmonary function test parameters in patients with interstitial lung diseases","authors":"L. Li,&nbsp;L. Wang,&nbsp;M. Wang,&nbsp;C.L. Jin,&nbsp;S. Yang,&nbsp;H. Li,&nbsp;L.P. Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.106795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate the correlation between semi-quantitative analyses and visual scores of pulmonary perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)/ Computed Tomography (CT) imaging and pulmonary function test parameters (PFTs) in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 35 patients with ILDs from China-Japan Friendship Hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. All patients underwent pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT imaging and a pulmonary function test. Visual scores of pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT images were determined using the Meyer method, and functional lung volumes of pulmonary perfusion were calculated using various cutoff values (5%–95% of the maximum pixel value). PFTs included forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV1%), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FVC as a percentage of the predicted value (FVC%), one-second rate (FEV1/FVC), pulmonary carbon monoxide dispersion (DLCO) and DLCO as a percentage of the predicted value (DLCO%). Pearson's correlation was calculated to compare visual scores and lung perfusion functional volumes with PFT indices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Visual scores correlated with FEV1, FEV1%, FVC% and DLCO%, with a significant correlation observed for FEV1% (<em>r</em> = 0.576, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). When taking the maximal pixel value of bilateral lung fields or unilateral lung field as 100%, lung perfusion volumes were significantly correlated with FEV1, FEV1%, FVC and FVC% at a threshold of 15%–30% (<em>r</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> &gt; 0.6, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pulmonary perfusion volumes within the threshold of 15%–30% in pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT imaging reliably reflect lung function and outperform visual scores in patients with ILDs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 106795"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926024006822","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the correlation between semi-quantitative analyses and visual scores of pulmonary perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)/ Computed Tomography (CT) imaging and pulmonary function test parameters (PFTs) in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs).

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 35 patients with ILDs from China-Japan Friendship Hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. All patients underwent pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT imaging and a pulmonary function test. Visual scores of pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT images were determined using the Meyer method, and functional lung volumes of pulmonary perfusion were calculated using various cutoff values (5%–95% of the maximum pixel value). PFTs included forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV1%), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FVC as a percentage of the predicted value (FVC%), one-second rate (FEV1/FVC), pulmonary carbon monoxide dispersion (DLCO) and DLCO as a percentage of the predicted value (DLCO%). Pearson's correlation was calculated to compare visual scores and lung perfusion functional volumes with PFT indices.

Results

Visual scores correlated with FEV1, FEV1%, FVC% and DLCO%, with a significant correlation observed for FEV1% (r = 0.576, P < 0.001). When taking the maximal pixel value of bilateral lung fields or unilateral lung field as 100%, lung perfusion volumes were significantly correlated with FEV1, FEV1%, FVC and FVC% at a threshold of 15%–30% (rs > 0.6, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Pulmonary perfusion volumes within the threshold of 15%–30% in pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT imaging reliably reflect lung function and outperform visual scores in patients with ILDs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺间质性疾病患者肺灌注SPECT/CT半定量分析及视觉评分与肺功能检查参数的相关性
目的:探讨间质性肺疾病(ILDs)患者肺灌注半定量分析与视觉评分、单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)/计算机断层扫描(CT)成像与肺功能试验参数(PFTs)的相关性。材料与方法:本回顾性研究纳入2020年1月至2022年12月在中日友好医院就诊的35例ild患者。所有患者均行肺灌注SPECT/CT成像和肺功能检查。使用Meyer方法确定肺灌注SPECT/CT图像的视觉评分,并使用不同的截断值(最大像素值的5%-95%)计算肺灌注的功能肺体积。PFTs包括第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和FEV1占预测值的百分比(FEV1%)、用力肺活量(FVC)和FVC占预测值的百分比(FVC%)、一秒速率(FEV1/FVC)、肺一氧化碳弥散度(DLCO)和DLCO占预测值的百分比(DLCO%)。计算Pearson相关性,比较视觉评分和肺灌注功能容积与PFT指数。结果:视觉评分与FEV1、FEV1%、FVC%、DLCO%相关,其中FEV1%相关性显著(r = 0.576, P < 0.001)。当双侧肺野或单侧肺野最大像素值为100%时,肺灌注体积与FEV1、FEV1%、FVC、FVC%在15% ~ 30%的阈值范围内显著相关(rs >.6, P < 0.001)。结论:肺灌注SPECT/CT成像在肺灌注阈值15%-30%范围内可靠地反映肺功能,优于ILDs患者的视觉评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
期刊最新文献
Pericoronary fat attenuation index is a potential indicator for the prognosis of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Computed tomography features of polysplenia syndrome in adulthood: a case series Prompt engineering enables open-source large language models to match proprietary models in diagnostic accuracy for annotation of radiology reports Diagnostic accuracy of proton density versus proton density fat-saturated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences in meniscal tear evaluation: a multireader ROC analysis Clinicians' preferences for radiology reports in a tertiary hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1