E_N_T_R_O_P_Y: Monocentric analysis of rectal cancer radio-chemotherapy treatment in patients of young age

IF 2.7 3区医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100905

E. Meldolesi , A. Nicolì , N. Dinapoli , G. Chiloiro , A. Romano , R. Menghi , R. Persiani , F. Pacelli , C. Coco , C. Ratto , S. Manfrida , L. Boldrini , B. Corvari , M.A. Gambacorta

{"title":"E_N_T_R_O_P_Y: Monocentric analysis of rectal cancer radio-chemotherapy treatment in patients of young age","authors":"E. Meldolesi , A. Nicolì , N. Dinapoli , G. Chiloiro , A. Romano , R. Menghi , R. Persiani , F. Pacelli , C. Coco , C. Ratto , S. Manfrida , L. Boldrini , B. Corvari , M.A. Gambacorta","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose//objectives</h3><div>A disproportionate incidence‘s increase of rectal cancer in patients younger than 50 years of age. The ESMO and NCCN recommendations are not age-specific and the literature is poor and conflicting. We decided to examine patients with rectal cancer treated in our centre in the last 15 years with curative neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy comparing outcomes in the two groups under and over 55 years old.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/methods</h3><div>788 rectal cancer patients were enrolled in this monocentric retrospective observational study (523 =>55 years and 265 < 55). All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment. R statistical software v.4.1.3 was used for the entire analysis. The outcomes were death, local recurrence, and new distant metastases. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank was used to compare the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patients were classified in different risk groups, according to the ESMO 2017 rectal cancer clinical practice guidelines. 88 % of patients under 55 years old at the diagnosis belonged to the bad or advanced risk groups with an equal division. In patients over 55 years old, there was a clear dominance of the advanced risk class (62 % of the total). In multivariate analysis, OS and DFS decrease with increasing age and ESMO risk group. The other variables in multivariate were not significant. For Both OS, DFS and MFS, the curves separated significantly at 55 years of age, with a prevalence of metastasis development in the older group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Elderly patients have a prevalence of advanced disease. Younger patients seem having a better OS at 3 and 5 years. ESMO risk group and age were the only variables affecting OS and DFS. Young patients have better MFS and DFS at 2 and 5 years than patients older than 55 years. The addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted not significant in both groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100905"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose//objectives

A disproportionate incidence‘s increase of rectal cancer in patients younger than 50 years of age. The ESMO and NCCN recommendations are not age-specific and the literature is poor and conflicting. We decided to examine patients with rectal cancer treated in our centre in the last 15 years with curative neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy comparing outcomes in the two groups under and over 55 years old.

Materials/methods

788 rectal cancer patients were enrolled in this monocentric retrospective observational study (523 =>55 years and 265 < 55). All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment. R statistical software v.4.1.3 was used for the entire analysis. The outcomes were death, local recurrence, and new distant metastases. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank was used to compare the two groups.

Results

All patients were classified in different risk groups, according to the ESMO 2017 rectal cancer clinical practice guidelines. 88 % of patients under 55 years old at the diagnosis belonged to the bad or advanced risk groups with an equal division. In patients over 55 years old, there was a clear dominance of the advanced risk class (62 % of the total). In multivariate analysis, OS and DFS decrease with increasing age and ESMO risk group. The other variables in multivariate were not significant. For Both OS, DFS and MFS, the curves separated significantly at 55 years of age, with a prevalence of metastasis development in the older group.

Conclusion

Elderly patients have a prevalence of advanced disease. Younger patients seem having a better OS at 3 and 5 years. ESMO risk group and age were the only variables affecting OS and DFS. Young patients have better MFS and DFS at 2 and 5 years than patients older than 55 years. The addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted not significant in both groups.

查看原文