Oral antibiotic prophylaxis induces changes in the microbiology of surgical site infection after colorectal surgery. A matched comparative study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1111/codi.70008
Miriam Flores-Yelamos, Montserrat Juvany, Josep M. Badia, Ana Vázquez, Marta Pascual, David Parés, Alexander Almendral, Enric Limón, Miquel Pujol, Aina Gomila-Grange, Members of the VINCat Colorectal Surveillance Team
{"title":"Oral antibiotic prophylaxis induces changes in the microbiology of surgical site infection after colorectal surgery. A matched comparative study","authors":"Miriam Flores-Yelamos,&nbsp;Montserrat Juvany,&nbsp;Josep M. Badia,&nbsp;Ana Vázquez,&nbsp;Marta Pascual,&nbsp;David Parés,&nbsp;Alexander Almendral,&nbsp;Enric Limón,&nbsp;Miquel Pujol,&nbsp;Aina Gomila-Grange,&nbsp;Members of the VINCat Colorectal Surveillance Team","doi":"10.1111/codi.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Oral antibiotic prophylaxis (OAP) lowers rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and may aid anastomotic healing in colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to analyse the understudied impact of OAP on SSI microbiology after colorectal surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A post hoc analysis was performed on a previous prospective, multicentre study of elective colorectal surgery. For 1000 patients with SSI, this study compared the microbiology of SSIs in procedures without OAP (SSI/OAP–) and with OAP (SSI/OAP+).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 340 patients in the SSI/OAP– group and 660 in the SSI/OAP+ group. The use of OAP increased the presence of Gram-positive cocci (GPC) (OR 1.542, 95% CI 1.153–2.062) and fungi (OR 2.037, 95% CI 1.206–3.440), but reduced rates of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) (OR 1.461, 95% CI 1.022–2.088) and anaerobe isolation (OR 0.331, 95% CI 0.158–0.696). Specifically, it led to increases in the isolation of <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> (OR 1.450, 95% CI 0.812–2.591), methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (OR 2.000, 95% CI 1.043–3.834) and <i>Candida</i> spp. (OR 2.037, 95% CI 1.206–3.440). In colon surgery with OAP, GPC infections were more likely (OR 1.461, 95% CI 1.022–2.088). In rectal surgery, organ/space SSIs had a higher risk of harbouring GPC (OR 1.860, 95% CI 1.153–2.999) and a lower risk of GNB (OR 0.321, 95% CI 0.200–0.515).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>OAP reduced the presence of anaerobes and GNB in SSIs, but increased the isolation of GPCs and fungi, with <i>E. faecium</i> and <i>Candida</i> being of particular concern. This information should guide empirical antibiotic therapy for postoperative colorectal SSIs in patients who have received preoperative OAP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Oral antibiotic prophylaxis (OAP) lowers rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and may aid anastomotic healing in colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to analyse the understudied impact of OAP on SSI microbiology after colorectal surgery.

Method

A post hoc analysis was performed on a previous prospective, multicentre study of elective colorectal surgery. For 1000 patients with SSI, this study compared the microbiology of SSIs in procedures without OAP (SSI/OAP–) and with OAP (SSI/OAP+).

Results

There were 340 patients in the SSI/OAP– group and 660 in the SSI/OAP+ group. The use of OAP increased the presence of Gram-positive cocci (GPC) (OR 1.542, 95% CI 1.153–2.062) and fungi (OR 2.037, 95% CI 1.206–3.440), but reduced rates of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) (OR 1.461, 95% CI 1.022–2.088) and anaerobe isolation (OR 0.331, 95% CI 0.158–0.696). Specifically, it led to increases in the isolation of Enterococcus faecium (OR 1.450, 95% CI 0.812–2.591), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (OR 2.000, 95% CI 1.043–3.834) and Candida spp. (OR 2.037, 95% CI 1.206–3.440). In colon surgery with OAP, GPC infections were more likely (OR 1.461, 95% CI 1.022–2.088). In rectal surgery, organ/space SSIs had a higher risk of harbouring GPC (OR 1.860, 95% CI 1.153–2.999) and a lower risk of GNB (OR 0.321, 95% CI 0.200–0.515).

Conclusion

OAP reduced the presence of anaerobes and GNB in SSIs, but increased the isolation of GPCs and fungi, with E. faecium and Candida being of particular concern. This information should guide empirical antibiotic therapy for postoperative colorectal SSIs in patients who have received preoperative OAP.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Colorectal Disease
Colorectal Disease 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Diseases of the colon and rectum are common and offer a number of exciting challenges. Clinical, diagnostic and basic science research is expanding rapidly. There is increasing demand from purchasers of health care and patients for clinicians to keep abreast of the latest research and developments, and to translate these into routine practice. Technological advances in diagnosis, surgical technique, new pharmaceuticals, molecular genetics and other basic sciences have transformed many aspects of how these diseases are managed. Such progress will accelerate. Colorectal Disease offers a real benefit to subscribers and authors. It is first and foremost a vehicle for publishing original research relating to the demanding, rapidly expanding field of colorectal diseases. Essential for surgeons, pathologists, oncologists, gastroenterologists and health professionals caring for patients with a disease of the lower GI tract, Colorectal Disease furthers education and inter-professional development by including regular review articles and discussions of current controversies. Note that the journal does not usually accept paediatric surgical papers.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of pelvic floor rehabilitation in the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome: Study protocol of the CONTICARE trial Supine extralevator abdominoperineal resection (ELAPE), technique and outcome—a video vignette Laparascopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis: A video vignette The validation of a simple and instrument-free technique to measure the depth of the natal cleft (a cohort study) High-grade intraepithelial lesions of the anus—patience: A road to wisdom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1