Are Non-invasive Multi-cancer Early Cancer Detection Tests the Future?

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08839-2
William M Grady
{"title":"Are Non-invasive Multi-cancer Early Cancer Detection Tests the Future?","authors":"William M Grady","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08839-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current cancer screening methods are effective for detecting early stage cancers and even preventing some cancers, but their effectiveness has only been demonstrated for a handful of cancers, and for many cancers, there are no screening tests clinically available. In addition, the majority of the screening methods are not ideal, resulting in suboptimal compliance and the occurrence of preventable cancers. A screening test that is convenient, safe, accurate and that can screen for multiple cancers is an ideal screening test that would address many of the shortcomings of the current tests. Multi-cancer detection tests (MCD) have the potential to meet these challenges and have engendered substantial enthusiasm in light of this. Using advances in DNA sequencing technology, cancer epigenetics and artificial intelligence, they are able to detect a large number of cancers predominantly via the patterns of methylated DNA alterations, DNA sequence alterations, and DNA fragment patterns of cell free DNA in the plasma and can accurately distinguish the cancer site of origin. Of note, some of the tests also combine circulating free DNA (cfDNA) with protein-based markers. However, for the majority of early stage cancers, the sensitivity is modest and below that of most of the current standard of care cancer screening tests. Furthermore, the clinical utility of screening for many of the cancers detectable by MCD tests remains to be proven. Here we describe the features of MCD tests, review the current data supporting their potential to be used in the clinic for cancer screening, and discuss the knowledge gaps surrounding understanding their clinical utility, with a focus on GI cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1694-1702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08839-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current cancer screening methods are effective for detecting early stage cancers and even preventing some cancers, but their effectiveness has only been demonstrated for a handful of cancers, and for many cancers, there are no screening tests clinically available. In addition, the majority of the screening methods are not ideal, resulting in suboptimal compliance and the occurrence of preventable cancers. A screening test that is convenient, safe, accurate and that can screen for multiple cancers is an ideal screening test that would address many of the shortcomings of the current tests. Multi-cancer detection tests (MCD) have the potential to meet these challenges and have engendered substantial enthusiasm in light of this. Using advances in DNA sequencing technology, cancer epigenetics and artificial intelligence, they are able to detect a large number of cancers predominantly via the patterns of methylated DNA alterations, DNA sequence alterations, and DNA fragment patterns of cell free DNA in the plasma and can accurately distinguish the cancer site of origin. Of note, some of the tests also combine circulating free DNA (cfDNA) with protein-based markers. However, for the majority of early stage cancers, the sensitivity is modest and below that of most of the current standard of care cancer screening tests. Furthermore, the clinical utility of screening for many of the cancers detectable by MCD tests remains to be proven. Here we describe the features of MCD tests, review the current data supporting their potential to be used in the clinic for cancer screening, and discuss the knowledge gaps surrounding understanding their clinical utility, with a focus on GI cancer screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无创多癌早期癌症检测是未来吗?
目前的癌症筛查方法对于发现早期癌症甚至预防某些癌症是有效的,但它们的有效性仅在少数癌症中得到证实,而对于许多癌症,临床上没有可用的筛查试验。此外,大多数筛查方法并不理想,导致不理想的依从性和可预防癌症的发生。一种方便、安全、准确并能筛查多种癌症的筛查测试是一种理想的筛查测试,它将解决当前测试的许多缺点。多种癌症检测测试(MCD)有潜力应对这些挑战,并因此产生了巨大的热情。利用DNA测序技术、癌症表观遗传学和人工智能的进步,他们能够主要通过血浆中细胞游离DNA的甲基化DNA改变、DNA序列改变和DNA片段模式来检测大量癌症,并能准确区分癌症的起源部位。值得注意的是,一些测试还将循环游离DNA (cfDNA)与基于蛋白质的标记结合起来。然而,对于大多数早期癌症,敏感性是中等的,低于大多数目前的标准护理癌症筛查试验。此外,对MCD检测检测到的许多癌症进行筛查的临床效用仍有待证实。在这里,我们描述了MCD测试的特点,回顾了支持其在临床癌症筛查中应用潜力的当前数据,并讨论了围绕其临床应用的知识差距,重点是胃肠道癌症筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Malondialdehyde Drives a Feed-Forward Reactive Oxygen Species Loop in Pediatric Crohn's Disease. Severe Influenza-Related Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Immunosuppressive Therapy: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis. Surgical Decision-Making in Colonoscopic Perforation: Predictors and Optimal Timing of Intervention in a 20-Year Single-Center Cohort. Lactated Ringer's Solution at a Standard Infusion Rate in Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis Prevention: A Retrospective Comparative Study. The Great Masquerader: When Perianal Disease Isn't What It Seems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1